| Literature DB >> 28655159 |
Qing He1,2,3, Yuan Gao4,5, Zhuye Jie4,5, Xinlei Yu4,5, Janne Marie Laursen6, Liang Xiao4,5, Ying Li1, Lingling Li2, Faming Zhang7, Qiang Feng4,8, Xiaoping Li4,5, Jinghong Yu4,5, Chuan Liu4,5, Ping Lan1,3, Ting Yan2, Xin Liu4,5, Xun Xu4,5, Huanming Yang4,9, Jian Wang4,9, Lise Madsen4,10,11, Susanne Brix6, Jianping Wang1,3, Karsten Kristiansen4,10, Huijue Jia4,5,12.
Abstract
The inflammatory intestinal disorder Crohn's disease (CD) has become a health challenge worldwide. The gut microbiota closely interacts with the host immune system, but its functional impact in CD is unclear. Except for studies on a small number of CD patients, analyses of the gut microbiota in CD have used 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. Here we employed metagenomic shotgun sequencing to provide a detailed characterization of the compositional and functional features of the CD microbiota, comprising also unannotated bacteria, and investigated its modulation by exclusive enteral nutrition. Based on signature taxa, CD microbiotas clustered into 2 distinct metacommunities, indicating individual variability in CD microbiome structure. Metacommunity-specific functional shifts in CD showed enrichment in producers of the pro-inflammatory hexa-acylated lipopolysaccharide variant and a reduction in the potential to synthesize short-chain fatty acids. Disruption of ecological networks was evident in CD, coupled with reduction in growth rates of many bacterial species. Short-term exclusive enteral nutrition elicited limited impact on the overall composition of the CD microbiota, although functional changes occurred following treatment. The microbiotas in CD patients can be stratified into 2 distinct metacommunities, with the most severely perturbed metacommunity exhibiting functional potentials that deviate markedly from that of the healthy individuals, with possible implication in relation to CD pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Crohn's disease; exclusive enteral nutrition; gut microbe; metagenomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28655159 PMCID: PMC5624284 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/gix050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gigascience ISSN: 2047-217X Impact factor: 6.524
Figure 1:Clustering of gut microbiota into metacommunities associated with CD. (a) Heatmap of signature microbes for 3 metacommunities determined by the DMM model. Rows correspond to 85 discriminative MGS, with hierarchical clustering by their relative abundances. Taxonomic annotations of these MGS are indicated at the right and colored by phylum. Each column corresponds to 1 sample. The disease status (the first horizontal bar) and metacommunity membership (the second horizontal bar) of samples are indicated by color at the top, and MD index for each sample is represented by gray scale (the third horizontal bar). (b) PCoA of the 85 MGS based on Jensen-Shannon distance (JSD). Colors indicate metacommunity memberships, and shapes (triangle or round) denote disease states (CT or CD).
Figure 2:Functional alterations of the gut microbiota in CD. (a) Heatmap and hierarchical clustering of KEGG pathways that are differentially enriched between the microbiota groups identified in Fig. 1a. Color scale represents reporter score, and only KEGG pathways with a reporter score greater than 1.9 are shown. (b) Relative abundances of Gram-negative MGS (the first left panel), Gram-positive MGS (the second left panel), penta-acylated LPS-producing MGS (the middle panel), hexa-acylated LPS-producing MGS (the second last panel), and the ratio of hexa- to penta-acylated LPS-producing MGS (the last panel) across different groups. The value of relative abundance was log-transformed. (c) Relative abundances of genes encoding key enzymes for the biosynthesis of different SCFAs across different microbiota groups. Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) synthase complex are crucial for acetic acid production; propionyl-CoA transferase and propionyl-CoA/succinyl-CoA transferase are responsible for propionate acid synthesis; butyryl CoA transferase accounts for butyric acid generation. Their relative abundances were log-transformed. (b, c) Statistical comparison by Wilcoxon test followed by a Benjamini-Hochberg correction for significance level; *q < 0.2; **q < 0.1; ***q < 0.05; ****q < 0.001.
Figure 3:Reconstruction of microbial interaction networks by CD. Co-occurrence (blue) relationships and co-exclusion (red) between taxa were estimated by SparCC algorithm, and correlation networks were compared between non-CD samples from metacommunity A (a, A-CT) and CD samples from metacommunity C (b, C-CD). Only relationships with coefficients above 0.3 are visualized, and the thickness of lines denotes the strength of the correlation, as indicated in the legend. Node size represents mean taxon abundance in networks, and node color represents the growth rate of each species (gray indicates no detection). Taxa of the same bacterial phylum are encircled by dashed lines.
Figure 4:Moderate modification of CD microbiota by EEN treatment. (a) Gut MGS from CD patients (n = 14) before and after 14 days of EEN were clustered into metacommunities and visualized as a heatmap representing the 85 discriminative MGS (as in Fig. 1a). Each column corresponds to 1 sample. (b) PCoA of pre- and post-EEN CD microbiota based on Jensen-Shannon distance (JSD). Arrows indicate the shift of position along the first 2 principal coordinates pre- to post-EEN treatment. The sample whose metacommunity identity changed after EEN treatment is marked with an asterisk (GZCD029). (c) Heatmap and hierarchical clustering KEGG pathways that were enriched or decreased in post- vs pre-EEN. Color scale represents reporter score, and only KEGG pathways with a reporter score greater than 1.9 are shown. (d) Log10 relative abundances of Gram-negative MGS (the first left panel), Gram-positive MGS (the second left panel), penta-acylated LPS-producing MGS (the middle panel), hexa-acylated LPS-producing MGS (the second last panel), and the ratio of hexa- to penta-acylated LPS-producing MGS (the last panel) in pre- vs post-EEN. (e) Log10 relative abundances of genes encoding key enzymes for the biosynthesis of different SCFAs in pre- vs post-EEN, as calculated in Fig. 2c. (d, e) Statistical comparison by Wilcoxon test, followed by a Benjamini-Hochberg correction for significance level, showed no changes between groups.
Summary metadata of all participants
| Patient characteristics | Control | CD | Permanova |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples | 54 | 49 | – |
| Age, mean ± SD, y | 20.70 ± 7.76 | 28.82 ± 8.04 | 0.01 |
| Gender, No. (%) | 0.02 | ||
| Male | 51 (94.44) | 36 (73.47) | |
| Female | 3 (5.56) | 13 (26.53) | |
| BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 | 21.49 ± 3.28 | 18.91 ± 2.85 | 0.001 |
| Lesion location, No. (%) | |||
| UGIT | – | 3 (6.12) | – |
| Jejunum | – | 3 (6.12) | – |
| Ileum | – | 40 (81.63) | – |
| Cecum | – | 5 (10.20) | – |
| Colon | – | 35 (71.43) | – |
| Nutritional status, No. (%) | |||
| Dystrophy-severe | – | 5 (10.20) | – |
| Dystrophy-medium | – | 7 (12.29) | – |
| Dystrophy-mild | – | 9 (18.37) | – |
| Good | – | 15 (30.61) | – |
| Fine | – | 10 (20.41) | – |
| EEN treatment, No. (%) | – | 14 (28.57) | – |
| 14 resampled after EEN treatment | |||