Literature DB >> 28655014

Association Between Health Plan Exit From Medicaid Managed Care and Quality of Care, 2006-2014.

Chima D Ndumele1, William L Schpero1, Mark J Schlesinger1, Amal N Trivedi2.   

Abstract

Importance: State Medicaid programs have increasingly contracted with insurers to provide medical care services for enrollees (Medicaid managed care plans). Insurers that provide these plans can exit Medicaid programs each year, with unclear effects on quality of care and health care experiences. Objective: To determine the frequency and interstate variation of health plan exit from Medicaid managed care and evaluate the relationship between health plan exit and market-level quality. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort of all comprehensive Medicaid managed care plans (N = 390) during the interval 2006-2014. Exposures: Plan exit, defined as the withdrawal of a managed care plan from a state's Medicaid program. Main Outcomes and Measures: Eight measures from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set were used to construct 3 composite indicators of quality (preventive care, chronic disease care management, and maternity care). Four measures from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems were combined into a composite indicator of patient experience, reflecting the proportion of beneficiaries rating experiences as 8 or above on a 0-to-10-point scale. Outcome data were available for 248 plans (68% of plans operating prior to 2014, representing 78% of beneficiaries).
Results: Of the 366 comprehensive Medicaid managed care plans operating prior to 2014, 106 exited Medicaid. These exiting plans enrolled 4 848 310 Medicaid beneficiaries, with a mean of 606 039 beneficiaries affected by plan exits annually. Six states had a mean of greater than 10% of Medicaid managed care recipients enrolled in plans that exited, whereas 10 states experienced no plan exits. Plans that exited from a state's Medicaid market performed significantly worse prior to exiting than those that remained in terms of preventive care (57.5% vs 60.4%; difference, 2.9% [95% CI, 0.3% to 5.5%]), maternity care (69.7% vs 73.6%; difference, 3.8% [95% CI, 1.7% to 6.0%]), and patient experience (73.5% vs 74.8%; difference, 1.3% [95% CI, 0.6% to 1.9%]). There was no significant difference between exiting and nonexiting plans for the quality of chronic disease care management (76.2% vs 77.1%; difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -2.1% to 4.0%]). There was also no significant change in overall market performance before and after the exit of a plan: 0.7-percentage point improvement in preventive care quality (95% CI, -4.9 to 6.3); 0.2-percentage point improvement in chronic disease care management quality (95% CI, -5.8 to 6.2); 0.7-percentage point decrease in maternity care quality (95% CI, -6.4 to 5.0]); and a 0.6-percentage point improvement in patient experience ratings (95% CI, -3.9 to 5.1). Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in exiting plans had access to coverage for a higher-quality plan, with 78% of plans in the same county having higher quality for preventive care, 71.1% for chronic disease management, 65.5% for maternity care, and 80.8% for patient experience. Conclusions and Relevance: Between 2006 and 2014, health plan exit from the US Medicaid program was frequent. Plans that exited generally had lower quality ratings than those that remained, and the exits were not associated with significant overall changes in quality or patient experience in the plans in the Medicaid market.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28655014      PMCID: PMC5815071          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.7118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

1.  Quality management practices in Medicaid managed care: a national survey of Medicaid and commercial health plans participating in the Medicaid program.

Authors:  B E Landon; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The evolution of quality management in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Eric C Schneider; Carol Tobias; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Overlap in HMO physician networks.

Authors:  Michael E Chernew; Walter P Wodchis; Dennis P Scanlon; Catherine G McLaughlin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Commercial plans in Medicaid managed care: understanding who stays and who leaves.

Authors:  Sharon K Long; Alshadye Yemane
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Gaps in health insurance: why so many Americans experience breaks in coverage and how the Affordable Care Act will help: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Health Insurance Tracking Survey of U.S. Adults, 2011.

Authors:  Sara R Collins; Ruth Robertson; Tracy Garber; Michelle M Doty
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2012-04

6.  Desperately seeking savings: states shift more Medicaid enrollees to managed care.

Authors:  John K Iglehart
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.

Authors:  Andrew B Bindman; Arpita Chattopadhyay; Dennis H Osmond; William Huen; Peter Bacchetti
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Tracy A Lieu; Thomas Keegan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Medicaid on the eve of expansion: a survey of state Medicaid officials on the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; Sarah Gordon; Stephen Somers; Carolyn Ingram; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2014

10.  M+C plan county exit decisions 1999-2001: implications for payment policy.

Authors:  Rachel Halpern
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2005
View more
  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type on Continuous Medicaid Enrollment: A Natural Experiment.

Authors:  Sarah H Gordon; Yoojin Lee; Chima D Ndumele; Patrick M Vivier; Roee Gutman; Shailender Swaminathan; Emily A Gadbois; Renee R Shield; Amy Jo Haavisto Kind; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Disruptions to the patient-provider relationship and patient utilization and outcomes: Evidence from medicaid managed care.

Authors:  Becky Staiger
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Effects of forced disruption in Medicaid managed care on children with asthma.

Authors:  Katherine Piwnica-Worms; Becky Staiger; Joseph S Ross; Marjorie S Rosenthal; Chima D Ndumele
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.734

4.  Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting.

Authors:  Pinar Kara; Jan Brink Valentin; Jan Mainz; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.

Authors:  Shailender Swaminathan; Chima D Ndumele; Sarah H Gordon; Yoojin Lee; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.