Literature DB >> 33074283

Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.

Shailender Swaminathan1,2, Chima D Ndumele3, Sarah H Gordon4, Yoojin Lee2, Amal N Trivedi2,5.   

Abstract

Importance: Enrollment in Medicaid managed care plans has increased rapidly, particularly in national commercial insurance plans. Whether the type of managed care plan is associated with the use of health services for Medicaid beneficiaries is unknown. Objective: To compare the use of outpatient and acute care between Medicaid enrollees randomly assigned to a national commercial managed care plan or a local Medicaid-focused managed care plan. Design, Setting, and Participants: This natural experiment of a cohort of Medicaid enrollees randomly assigned to 2 managed care plans in a Northeastern US state was conducted from June 30, 2009, to June 30, 2013. Statistical analysis was performed from September 1, 2019, to August 30, 2020. Interventions: Assignment to a Medicaid-focused insurance plan or a commercial managed care plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and total inpatient and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations.
Results: A total of 8010 patients were included in the analysis: 4737 were assigned to a Medicaid-focused plan (2795 female [59.0%]; mean [SD] age, 17.8 [3.2] years) and 3273 to a commercial managed care plan (1915 female [58.5%]; mean [SD] age, 17.9 [3.3] years). Those randomly assigned to the Medicaid-focused plan had a mean (SD) of 6.67 (9.18) annual outpatient visits per person, and those assigned to the commercial plan had a mean (SD) of 8.36 (11.77) annual outpatient visits per person (adjusted absolute difference, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.31-2.13]; 22% relative difference). The increased use of outpatient visits in the commercial plan was associated with an increase in specialty care visits (mean [SD], 2.34 [6.31] visits in Medicaid-focused plan vs 3.75 [9.32] visits in commerical plan; adjusted absolute difference, 1.43 visits [95% CI, 1.25-1.56 visits]; 61% relative difference). Mean (SD) annual emergency department visits were 0.49 (1.39) per person in the Medicaid-focused plan and 0.51 (1.40) in the commercial plan (adjusted absolute difference, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.05]). Mean (SD) annual inpatient admissions were 0.067 (0.45) per person in the Medicaid-focused plan and 0.069 (0.53) in the commercial plan (adjusted absolute difference, 0.003 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.02]). Plan assignment was not significantly associated with ambulatory care-sensitive admissions. Results were consistent in instrumental variables analyses that accounted for disenrollment and switching. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with Medicaid managed care enrollees assigned to a Medicaid-focused plan, those assigned to a commercial plan had more outpatient visits, particularly for specialty care, but had similar rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations. These findings suggest that the type of managed care plan may be associated with health services use and spending among Medicaid beneficiaries and that random assignment may help states understand how well different plans perform for enrollees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33074283      PMCID: PMC7573794          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  15 in total

1.  The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type on Continuous Medicaid Enrollment: A Natural Experiment.

Authors:  Sarah H Gordon; Yoojin Lee; Chima D Ndumele; Patrick M Vivier; Roee Gutman; Shailender Swaminathan; Emily A Gadbois; Renee R Shield; Amy Jo Haavisto Kind; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Health Care Use and Spending for Medicaid Enrollees in Federally Qualified Health Centers Versus Other Primary Care Settings.

Authors:  Robert S Nocon; Sang Mee Lee; Ravi Sharma; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Dana B Mukamel; Yue Gao; Laura M White; Leiyu Shi; Marshall H Chin; Neda Laiteerapong; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Do for-profit health plans restrict access to care under Medicaid managed care?

Authors:  Sharon K Long
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Quality of care in Medicaid managed care and commercial health plans.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Eric C Schneider; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Sarah Hudson Scholle; L Gregory Pawlson; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Assessing the financial health of Medicaid managed care plans and the quality of patient care they provide.

Authors:  Michael J McCue; Michael H Bailit
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2011-06

6.  Using HMOs to serve the Medicaid population: what are the effects on utilization and does the type of HMO matter?

Authors:  Bradley Herring; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Continuous Enrollment: a Two-State Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Gordon; Benjamin D Sommers; Ira Wilson; Omar Galarraga; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Quality Management Strategies in Medicaid Managed Care: Perspectives From Medicaid, Plans, and Providers.

Authors:  Emily A Gadbois; Sarah H Gordon; Renee R Shield; Patrick M Vivier; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.929

9.  Effects Of Medicaid Expansion On Postpartum Coverage And Outpatient Utilization.

Authors:  Sarah H Gordon; Benjamin D Sommers; Ira B Wilson; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Qualitative perspectives of primary care providers who treat Medicaid managed care patients.

Authors:  Sarah H Gordon; Emily A Gadbois; Renee R Shield; Patrick M Vivier; Chima D Ndumele; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.