Literature DB >> 28654040

Video Tracking Protocol to Screen Deterrent Chemistries for Honey Bees.

Nicholas R Larson1, Troy D Anderson2.   

Abstract

The European honey bee, Apis mellifera L., is an economically and agriculturally important pollinator that generates billions of dollars annually. Honey bee colony numbers have been declining in the United States and many European countries since 1947. A number of factors play a role in this decline, including the unintentional exposure of honey bees to pesticides. The development of new methods and regulations are warranted to reduce pesticide exposures to these pollinators. One approach is the use of repellent chemistries that deter honey bees from a recently pesticide-treated crop. Here, we describe a protocol to discern the deterrence of honey bees exposed to select repellent chemistries. Honey bee foragers are collected and starved overnight in an incubator 15 h prior to testing. Individual honey bees are placed into Petri dishes that have either a sugar-agarose cube (control treatment) or sugar-agarose-compound cube (repellent treatment) placed into the middle of the dish. The Petri dish serves as the arena that is placed under a camera in a light box to record the honey bee locomotor activities using video tracking software. A total of 8 control and 8 repellent treatments were analyzed for a 10 min period with each treatment was duplicated with new honey bees. Here, we demonstrate that honey bees are deterred from the sugar-agarose cubes with a compound treatment whereas honey bees are attracted to the sugar-agarose cubes without an added compound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28654040      PMCID: PMC5608377          DOI: 10.3791/55603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

1.  Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yuanbo Li; Rebecca A Kelley; Troy D Anderson; Michael J Lydy
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 2.  Insect repellents: an overview.

Authors:  M Brown; A A Hebert
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Field evaluations of topical arthropod repellents in North, Central, and South America.

Authors:  Kendra L Lawrence; Nicole L Achee; Ulrich R Bernier; Kirk D Mundal; John Paul Benante
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Using video-tracking to assess sublethal effects of pesticides on honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Bethany S Teeters; Reed M Johnson; Marion D Ellis; Blair D Siegfried
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  A historical review of managed honey bee populations in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them.

Authors:  Dennis Vanengelsdorp; Marina Doris Meixner
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  High levels of miticides and agrochemicals in North American apiaries: implications for honey bee health.

Authors:  Christopher A Mullin; Maryann Frazier; James L Frazier; Sara Ashcraft; Roger Simonds; Dennis Vanengelsdorp; Jeffery S Pettis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Insect repellents: historical perspectives and new developments.

Authors:  Tracy M Katz; Jason H Miller; Adelaide A Hebert
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 11.527

8.  The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Pathogens, pests, and economics: drivers of honey bee colony declines and losses.

Authors:  Kristine M Smith; Elizabeth H Loh; Melinda K Rostal; Carlos M Zambrana-Torrelio; Luciana Mendiola; Peter Daszak
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.184

10.  Honey Bee Gut Microbiome Is Altered by In-Hive Pesticide Exposures.

Authors:  Madhavi L Kakumanu; Alison M Reeves; Troy D Anderson; Richard R Rodrigues; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Heterocyclic Amine-Induced Feeding Deterrence and Antennal Response of Honey Bees.

Authors:  Nicholas R Larson; Scott T O'Neal; Thomas P Kuhar; Ulrich R Bernier; Jeffrey R Bloomquist; Troy D Anderson
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Terpenoid-Induced Feeding Deterrence and Antennal Response of Honey Bees.

Authors:  Nicholas R Larson; Scott T O'Neal; Ulrich R Bernier; Jeffrey R Bloomquist; Troy D Anderson
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.769

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.