Literature DB >> 26048827

Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Yuanbo Li1, Rebecca A Kelley1, Troy D Anderson2, Michael J Lydy3.   

Abstract

One of the hypotheses that may help explain the loss of honey bee colonies worldwide is the increasing potential for exposure of honey bees to complex mixtures of pesticides. To better understand this phenomenon, two multi-residue methods based on different extraction and cleanup procedures have been developed, and compared for the determination of 11 relevant pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Sample preparatory methods included solvent extraction followed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) cleanup and cleanup using a dispersive solid-phase extraction with zirconium-based sorbents (Z-Sep). Matrix effects, method detection limits, recoveries, and reproducibility were evaluated and compared. Method detection limits (MDL) of the pesticides for the GPC method in honey bees, pollen, and wax ranged from 0.65 to 5.92 ng/g dw, 0.56 to 6.61 ng/g dw, and 0.40 to 8.30 ng/g dw, respectively, while MDLs for the Z-Sep method were from 0.33 to 4.47 ng/g dw, 0.42 to 5.37 ng/g dw, and 0.51 to 5.34 ng/g dw, respectively. The mean recoveries in all matrices and at three spiking concentrations ranged from 64.4% to 149.5% and 71.9% to 126.2% for the GPC and Z-Sep methods, with relative standard deviation between 1.5-25.3% and 1.3-15.9%, respectively. The results showed that the Z-Sep method was more suitable for the determination of the target pesticides, especially chlorothalonil, in bee hive samples. The Z-Sep method was then validated using a series of field-collected bee hive samples taken from honey bee colonies in Virginia.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gel permeation chromatography; Honey bees; Pesticides; Pollen; Wax; Z-Sep

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26048827     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  5 in total

1.  Video Tracking Protocol to Screen Deterrent Chemistries for Honey Bees.

Authors:  Nicholas R Larson; Troy D Anderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Miniaturized Salting-Out Assisted Liquid-Liquid Extraction Combined with Disposable Pipette Extraction for Fast Sample Preparation of Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Bee Pollen.

Authors:  Xijuan Tu; Wenbin Chen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Toxic effects of detected pyrethroid pesticides on honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica Spin and Apis cerana cerana Fabricius).

Authors:  Qiongqiong Liu; Qibao He; Shiyu Zhang; Yuhao Chai; Quan Gao; Jinjing Xiao; Qingkui Fang; Linsheng Yu; Haiqun Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  In-Hive Acaricides Alter Biochemical and Morphological Indicators of Honey Bee Nutrition, Immunity, and Development.

Authors:  Alison M Reeves; Scott T O'Neal; Richard D Fell; Carlyle C Brewster; Troy D Anderson
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  A holistic study of neonicotinoids neuroactive insecticides-properties, applications, occurrence, and analysis.

Authors:  Bogusław Buszewski; Małgorzata Bukowska; Magdalena Ligor; Irena Staneczko-Baranowska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.