Literature DB >> 28653887

The effect of distant metastases sites on survival in de novo stage-IV breast cancer: A SEER database analysis.

San-Gang Wu1, Hui Li2, Li-Ying Tang3, Jia-Yuan Sun4, Wen-Wen Zhang4, Feng-Yan Li4, Yong-Xiong Chen3, Zhen-Yu He4.   

Abstract

To investigate the effect of distant metastases sites on survival in patients with de novo stage-IV breast cancer. From 2010 to 2013, patients with a diagnosis of de novo stage-IV breast cancer were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze the effect of distant metastases sites on breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival. A total of 7575 patients were identified. The most common metastatic sites were bone, followed by lung, liver, and brain. Patients with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- and hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ status were more prone to bone metastases. Lung and brain metastases were common in hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ and hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- subtypes, and patients with hormone receptor+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ and hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ subtypes were more prone to liver metastases. Patients with liver and brain metastases had unfavorable prognosis for breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival, whereas bone and lung metastases had no effect on patient survival in multivariate analyses. The hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- subtype conferred a significantly poorer outcome in terms of breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival. hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ disease was associated with the best prognosis in terms of breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Patients with liver and brain metastases were more likely to experience poor prognosis for breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival by various breast cancer subtypes. Distant metastases sites have differential impact on clinical outcomes in stage-IV breast cancer. Follow-up screening for brain and liver metastases might be effective in improving breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Epidemiology; Surveillance; and End Results; metastases; subtype; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653887     DOI: 10.1177/1010428317705082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  26 in total

Review 1.  Breast Cancer and Multiple Primary Malignant Tumors: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alessandro De Luca; Federico Frusone; Massimo Vergine; Rosario Cocchiara; Giuseppe La Torre; Laura Ballesio; Massimo Monti; Maria Ida Amabile
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  How do organ-specific metastases affect prognosis and surgical treatment for patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma: first evidence from population based data.

Authors:  Fan Dong; Hangcheng Fu; Xiao Shi; Yifan Shen; Tianyuan Xu; Fengbin Gao; Xianjin Wang; Shan Zhong; Qiang Ding; Zhoujun Shen; Shanwen Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  High-Throughput Magnetic Actuation Platform for Evaluating the Effect of Mechanical Force on 3D Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Ángel Enríquez; Sarah Libring; Tyler C Field; Julian Jimenez; Taeksang Lee; Hyunsu Park; Douglas Satoski; Michael K Wendt; Sarah Calve; Adrian Buganza Tepole; Luis Solorio; Hyowon Lee
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 4.  Forkhead Box Transcription Factors: Double-Edged Swords in Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Castaneda; Petra den Hollander; Sendurai A Mani
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 13.312

5.  Patterns of de-novo metastasis and breast cancer-specific mortality by race and molecular subtype in the SEER population-based dataset.

Authors:  Swati Sakhuja; April Deveaux; Lauren E Wilson; Neomi Vin-Raviv; Dongyu Zhang; Dejana Braithwaite; Sean Altekruse; Tomi Akinyemiju
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Intra-Arterial Therapies for Liver Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  B M Aarts; F M Gómez Muñoz; H Wildiers; V O Dezentjé; T R Baetens; W Schats; M Lopez-Yurda; R C Dresen; B J de Wit-van der Veen; C M Deroose; G Maleux; R G H Beets-Tan; E G Klompenhouwer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Sites of metastasis and overall survival in esophageal cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Wen-Wen Zhang; Zhen-Yu He; Jia-Yuan Sun; Yong-Xiong Chen; Ling Guo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Prognostic value of site-specific metastases and therapeutic roles of surgery for patients with metastatic bladder cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fan Dong; Yifan Shen; Fengbin Gao; Tianyuan Xu; Xianjin Wang; Xiaohua Zhang; Shan Zhong; Minguang Zhang; Shanwen Chen; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Incidence proportions and prognosis of breast cancer patients with bone metastases at initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Yue Gong; Jing Zhang; Peng Ji; Hong Ling; Xin Hu; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  A Novel Staging System for De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer Refines Prognostic Estimates.

Authors:  Jennifer K Plichta; Samantha M Thomas; Amanda R Sergesketter; Rachel A Greenup; Laura H Rosenberger; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Gretchen Kimmick; Jeremy Force; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 13.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.