Literature DB >> 28653674

Effects of orthotic therapeutic electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with paresis associated with acute cervical spinal cord injury: a randomized control trial.

K Iwahashi1, T Hayashi1,2, R Watanabe1, A Nishimura1, T Ueta1,2, T Maeda2, K Shiba2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of orthotic therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) on the hand in patients with paresis associated with acute cervical spinal cord injury.
SETTING: Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
METHODS: The study included patients treated for spinal cord injuries (Frankel classification, grades B and C) at our institution within 1 week post injury between May 2011 and December 2014. The patients were allocated randomly to TES and control groups at the time of admission and underwent TES+conventional training or conventional training alone, respectively. Both hands of each patient were treated in the same way. The primary outcome was total passive motion (TPM) of the fingers (degrees). The secondary outcomes were edema (cm) and the upper-extremity motor scores of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). After randomization, outcomes were assessed at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post injury in both groups.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine individuals were assessed at 3 months (15, TES; 14, control). There were no significant between-group differences for TPM of the fingers, edema and upper-extremity motor scores at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after injury, although TPM of the fingers tended to be lower in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear from the results of this study whether TES has a therapeutic effect on TPM, edema or the upper-extremity motor score of the ISNCSCI. The results of this study provide useful data for future meta-analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653674     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2017.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  18 in total

Review 1.  Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations.

Authors:  M R Popovic; A Curt; T Keller; V Dietz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).

Authors:  Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Surgery for the quadriplegic hand with active, strong wrist extension preserved. A study of 97 cases.

Authors:  E Zancolli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Functional electrical stimulation therapy of voluntary grasping versus only conventional rehabilitation for patients with subacute incomplete tetraplegia: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Milos R Popovic; Naaz Kapadia; Vera Zivanovic; Julio C Furlan; B Cathy Craven; Colleen McGillivray
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I.

Authors:  H L Frankel; D O Hancock; G Hyslop; J Melzak; L S Michaelis; G H Ungar; J D Vernon; J J Walsh
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1969-11

6.  Functional electrical therapy: retraining grasping in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M R Popovic; T A Thrasher; M E Adams; V Takes; V Zivanovic; M I Tonack
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Persons with C5 or C6 tetraplegia achieve selected functional gains using a neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Gad Alon; Keith McBride
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Functional electrical stimulation therapy for grasping in traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury: randomized control trial.

Authors:  Naaz M Kapadia; Vera Zivanovic; Julio C Furlan; B Cathy Craven; Colleen McGillivray; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.094

9.  Functional electrical stimulation cycling has no clear effect on urine output, lower limb swelling, and spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a randomised cross-over trial.

Authors:  Keira E Ralston; Lisa Harvey; Julia Batty; Lee B Bonsan; Marsha Ben; Rita Cusmiani; Jacqueline Bennett
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.000

10.  Results of tenolysis for flexor tendon adhesion after phalangeal fracture.

Authors:  H Yamazaki; H Kato; S Uchiyama; H Ohmoto; A Minami
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2008-07-28
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Soft robotics and functional electrical stimulation advances for restoring hand function in people with SCI: a narrative review, clinical guidelines and future directions.

Authors:  Lucas R L Cardoso; Vanesa Bochkezanian; Arturo Forner-Cordero; Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Antonio P L Bo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.208

2.  Effect of combined chondroitinase ABC and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a rat model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Liu; Jiefeng Wang; Guangkuo Li; Honglin Lv
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.952

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.