Literature DB >> 28653484

Theoretical implications of quantitative properties of interval timing and probability estimation in mouse and rat.

Aaron Kheifets1, David Freestone2, C R Gallistel1.   

Abstract

In three experiments with mice ( Mus musculus ) and rats (Rattus norvigicus), we used a switch paradigm to measure quantitative properties of the interval-timing mechanism. We found that: 1) Rodents adjusted the precision of their timed switches in response to changes in the interval between the short and long feed latencies (the temporal goalposts). 2) The variability in the timing of the switch response was reduced or unchanged in the face of large trial-to-trial random variability in the short and long feed latencies. 3) The adjustment in the distribution of switch latencies in response to changes in the relative frequency of short and long trials was sensitive to the asymmetry in the Kullback-Leibler divergence. The three results suggest that durations are represented with adjustable precision, that they are timed by multiple timers, and that there is a trial-by-trial (episodic) record of feed latencies in memory.
© 2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kullback-Leibler divergence; coefficient of variation; endogenous variability; exogenous variability; mouse; rat; timing theories

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653484      PMCID: PMC5576873          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  48 in total

1.  Self-organizing neural integrator predicts interval times through climbing activity.

Authors:  Daniel Durstewitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Mice take calculated risks.

Authors:  Aaron Kheifets; C R Gallistel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 4.  The importance of proving the null.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Kinetics of matching.

Authors:  T A Mark; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-01

6.  Scalar timing in memory.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R M Church; W H Meck
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The influence of multiple temporal memories in the peak-interval procedure.

Authors:  A George Wilson; Matthew S Matell; Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  An approximately Bayesian delta-rule model explains the dynamics of belief updating in a changing environment.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Robert C Wilson; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The rat approximates an ideal detector of changes in rates of reward: implications for the law of effect.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; T A Mark; A P King; P E Latham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-10

10.  Modeling pharmacological clock and memory patterns of interval timing in a striatal beat-frequency model with realistic, noisy neurons.

Authors:  Sorinel A Oprisan; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-23
View more
  9 in total

1.  Numbers and brains.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Finding numbers in the brain.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The Strength of Alpha-Beta Oscillatory Coupling Predicts Motor Timing Precision.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Tadeusz W Kononowicz; Tom Dupré la Tour; Alexandre Gramfort; Valérie Doyère; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Relative salience signaling within a thalamo-orbitofrontal circuit governs learning rate.

Authors:  Vijay Mohan K Namboodiri; Taylor Hobbs; Ivan Trujillo-Pisanty; Rhiana C Simon; Madelyn M Gray; Garret D Stuber
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Choice history effects in mice and humans improve reward harvesting efficiency.

Authors:  Junior Samuel López-Yépez; Juliane Martin; Oliver Hulme; Duda Kvitsiani
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The effect of attention and working memory on the estimation of elapsed time.

Authors:  Ignacio Polti; Benoît Martin; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Rodents monitor their error in self-generated duration on a single trial basis.

Authors:  Tadeusz Władysław Kononowicz; Virginie van Wassenhove; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Tracing the shadow of time.

Authors:  Fuat Balcı
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Recalibrating timing behavior via expected covariance between temporal cues.

Authors:  Benjamin J De Corte; Rebecca R Della Valle; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.