Literature DB >> 28652439

Which Is the Safer Anastomotic Method for Colon Surgery? - Ten-year Results.

Makoto Kosuge1, Ken Eto2, Ryosuke Hashizume2, Mitsumasa Takeda2, Kenta Tomori2, Kai Neki2, Norio Mitsumori2, Katsuhiko Yanaga2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: In colon surgery, the anastomotic method is generally selected by surgeon's preferences or by local conditions. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed anastomotic complications to assess safe methods of anastomosis in colonic resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 684 cases, performed between July 2003 and June 2013 in our Hospital. Anastomosis complications, such as leakage, stricture and bleeding, were analyzed in relation to the three methods of anastomosis, hand-sewn (HS), functional end-to-end (FEEA) and triangulating anastomosis (TRI).
RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that the incidence of leakage was significantly lower in laparoscopic surgeries (p=0.034) and TRI (p=0.047). The results of the multivariable analysis indicated that anastomotic leakage was significantly less with TRI (p=0.029).
CONCLUSION: In colon surgery, TRI seems to be associated with a low risk of anastomotic leakage compared to HS and FEEA. Copyright
© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Triangulating anastomosis; colonic resection; functional end-to-end anastomosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28652439      PMCID: PMC5566922          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  19 in total

1.  Triangulating anastomosis using a linear cutter in a colectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hajime Yokomizo; Arihiro Umehara; Kiyohito Yoshida; Takashi Fujimoto; Kiyo Watanabe; Kenji Ogawa
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov

2.  Evaluation of the mechanical strength and patency of functional end-to-end anastomoses.

Authors:  T Goto; K Kawasaki; Y Fujino; K Kanemitsu; T Kamigaki; D Kuroda; Y Suzuki; Y Kuroda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Ugo Elmore; Enrico Di Salvo; Paolo Delrio; Luigi Bucci; Giuseppe Paolo Ferulano; Carmine Napolitano; Maria Rachele Angiolini; Umberto Bracale; Marco Clemente; Michele D'ambra; Gaetano Luglio; Mario Musella; Ugo Pace; Riccardo Rosati; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses.

Authors:  F M Steichen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Errors and pitfalls in stapling gastrointestinal tract anastomoses.

Authors:  J L Chassin; K M Rifkind; J W Turner
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.

Authors:  Pui Yee Grace Choy; Ian P Bissett; James G Docherty; Bryan R Parry; Arend Merrie; Anita Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

7.  Renewed assessment of the stapled anastomosis with the increasing role of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Ramzi Amri; Liliana G Bordeianou; Patricia Sylla; David L Berger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis following colonic resection.

Authors:  S Kyzer; P H Gordon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Ischaemic strictures in patients treated with a low anterior resection and perioperative radiotherapy for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  L Påhlman; B Glimelius; G Frykholm
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Triangulating stapling technique for reconstruction after colectomy.

Authors:  Y Fukunaga; M Higashino; S Tanimura; Harushi Osugi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal colo-colonic triangular anastomosis versus functional end-to-end anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted surgery for left-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Kentaro Sato; Ken Imaizumi; Hiroyuki Kasajima; Michihiro Kurushima; Minoru Umehara; Yosuke Tsuruga; Daisuke Yamana; Aya Sato; Kentaro Ichimura; Kazuaki Nakanishi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Safety of anastomotic techniques and consequences of anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Etele Élthes; Daniela Sala; Radu Mircea Neagoe; Kálmán Sárdi; János Székely
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-10-25

3.  Standardization of surgical procedures to reduce risk of anastomotic leakage, reoperation, and surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 1189 patients.

Authors:  Ken Eto; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Makoto Kosuge; Masahisa Ohkuma; Rota Noaki; Kai Neki; Daisuke Ito; Yasuhiro Takeda; Hiroshi Sugano; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Side-to-side versus end-to-side ileocolic anastomosis in right-sided colectomies: A cohort control study.

Authors:  Snow Yunni Lin; Bryan Jun Liang Buan; Wilson Sim; Sneha Rajiv Jain; Heidi Sian Ying Chang; Kuok Chung Lee; Choon Seng Chong
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.018

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.