Literature DB >> 28652008

Model-based spike sorting with a mixture of drifting t-distributions.

Kevin Q Shan1, Evgueniy V Lubenov1, Athanassios G Siapas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic extracellular recordings are a powerful tool for systems neuroscience, but spike sorting remains a challenge. A common approach is to fit a generative model, such as a mixture of Gaussians, to the observed spike data. Even if non-parametric methods are used for spike sorting, such generative models provide a quantitative measure of unit isolation quality, which is crucial for subsequent interpretation of the sorted spike trains. NEW
METHOD: We present a spike sorting strategy that models the data as a mixture of drifting t-distributions. This model captures two important features of chronic extracellular recordings-cluster drift over time and heavy tails in the distribution of spikes-and offers improved robustness to outliers.
RESULTS: We evaluate this model on several thousand hours of chronic tetrode recordings and show that it fits the empirical data substantially better than a mixture of Gaussians. We also provide a software implementation that can re-fit long datasets in a few seconds, enabling interactive clustering of chronic recordings. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: We identify three common failure modes of spike sorting methods that assume stationarity and evaluate their impact given the empirically-observed cluster drift in chronic recordings. Using hybrid ground truth datasets, we also demonstrate that our model-based estimate of misclassification error is more accurate than previous unit isolation metrics.
CONCLUSIONS: The mixture of drifting t-distributions model enables efficient spike sorting of long datasets and provides an accurate measure of unit isolation quality over a wide range of conditions.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic recording; Cluster drift; Clustering; Heavy tails; Spike overlap; Unit isolation metrics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28652008      PMCID: PMC5563448          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  26 in total

Review 1.  A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials.

Authors:  M S Lewicki
Journal:  Network       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.273

2.  SMEM algorithm for mixture models.

Authors:  N Ueda; R Nakano; Z Ghahramani; G E Hinton
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Improved spike-sorting by modeling firing statistics and burst-dependent spike amplitude attenuation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach.

Authors:  Christophe Pouzat; Matthieu Delescluse; Pascal Viot; Jean Diebolt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Robust, automatic spike sorting using mixtures of multivariate t-distributions.

Authors:  Shy Shoham; Matthew R Fellows; Richard A Normann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Recording spikes from a large fraction of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch.

Authors:  Ronen Segev; Joe Goodhouse; Jason Puchalla; Michael J Berry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Spike sorting: Bayesian clustering of non-stationary data.

Authors:  Aharon Bar-Hillel; Adam Spiro; Eran Stark
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Recording chronically from the same neurons in awake, behaving primates.

Authors:  Andreas S Tolias; Alexander S Ecker; Athanassios G Siapas; Andreas Hoenselaar; Georgios A Keliris; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Quantitative measures of cluster quality for use in extracellular recordings.

Authors:  N Schmitzer-Torbert; J Jackson; D Henze; K Harris; A D Redish
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  An online spike detection and spike classification algorithm capable of instantaneous resolution of overlapping spikes.

Authors:  Felix Franke; Michal Natora; Clemens Boucsein; Matthias H J Munk; Klaus Obermayer
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  Nyquist interpolation improves neuron yield in multiunit recordings.

Authors:  Timothy J Blanche; Nicholas V Swindale
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Continuing progress of spike sorting in the era of big data.

Authors:  David Carlson; Lawrence Carin
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Deep convolutional models improve predictions of macaque V1 responses to natural images.

Authors:  Santiago A Cadena; George H Denfield; Edgar Y Walker; Leon A Gatys; Andreas S Tolias; Matthias Bethge; Alexander S Ecker
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 3.  From End to End: Gaining, Sorting, and Employing High-Density Neural Single Unit Recordings.

Authors:  Réka Barbara Bod; János Rokai; Domokos Meszéna; Richárd Fiáth; István Ulbert; Gergely Márton
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Compatibility Evaluation of Clustering Algorithms for Contemporary Extracellular Neural Spike Sorting.

Authors:  Rakesh Veerabhadrappa; Masood Ul Hassan; James Zhang; Asim Bhatti
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Attentional fluctuations induce shared variability in macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  George H Denfield; Alexander S Ecker; Tori J Shinn; Matthias Bethge; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Concurrent recordings of hippocampal neuronal spikes and prefrontal synaptic inputs from an awake rat.

Authors:  Yuya Nishimura; Yuji Ikegaya; Takuya Sasaki
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-06-08

7.  Sorting Overlapping Spike Waveforms from Electrode and Tetrode Recordings.

Authors:  Yasamin Mokri; Rodrigo F Salazar; Baldwin Goodell; Jonathan Baker; Charles M Gray; Shih-Cheng Yen
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.081

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.