| Literature DB >> 28651578 |
Md Mamun Or Rashid1, Kazi Nahid Akhter2, Jakir Ahmed Chowdhury3, Foysal Hossen4, Md Saddam Hussain2, Md Tanvir Hossain5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our present study was conducted to characterize the phytoconstituents present in the aqueous extract of Momordica charantia and evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-extract nanoparticles (Ag-Extract-NPs).Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; M. charantia; Silver extract nanoparticles (Ag-extract-NPs); Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28651578 PMCID: PMC5485605 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1843-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Phytochemical analysis of aqueous extract of M. charantia fruits
| Phytochemical | Test name | Aqueous extract of |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaloid | Meyer Test | + |
| Wagner Test | ++ | |
| Phenolic | Ferric Chloride Test | + |
| Lead Acetate Test | ++ | |
| Tanins | Ferric Chloride Test | + |
| Potassium Dicromate Test | − | |
| Saponin | Froth’s Test | ++ |
| Glycoside | Keller Kilani Test | + |
| Protein | Xanthroprotic Test | + |
| Reducing Sugar | Fehling’s Test | + |
| Phytosterol | Liebermann-Burchard’s Test | _ |
Here, ++ = Moderate; + = Normal Concentration; − = Absent
Fig. 1UV-Vis spectrum of AgNPs
Fig. 2FTIR spectrum of M. charantia extract (Curve-1) and Ag-Extract-NPs (Curve-2)
Fig. 3SEM image of Ag-Extract-NPs
Fig. 4TEM image of Ag-Extract-NPs
Antibacterial activity of M. charantia extract, AgNPs and Ag-Extract-NPs
| Items | Zone of inhibition (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ATCC 25923 | ATCC 14028 | ATCC 25922 | ATCC 27853 | |
|
| 16.6 ± 0.5*** | 8 ± 0.3*** | 28.0 ± 0.9* | 20.6 ± 0.7*** |
| AgNPs (50 μg/ml) | 14.4 ± 0.5*** | 6.4 ± 0.4*** | 20.6 ± 0.9*** | 20.0 ± 0.6*** |
| Ag-Extract-NPs (50 μg/ml) | 24.8 ± 0.7*** | 7.4 ± 0.4*** | 34.6 ± 0.8*** | 26.4 ± 0.4* |
| Ciprofloxacin (20 μg/ml) | 23.2 ± 0.4 | 21.4 ± 0.5 | 25.6 ± 0.5 | 25.2 ± 0.4 |
Mean ± SEM (n = 5); Data was analyzed using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s t-test and compared with standard. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005 were considered significant
Fig. 5Antibacterial activities of M. charantia, AgNPs, Ag-Extract-NPs against- a E. coli b S. typhi c S. aureus d P. aeruginosa