Literature DB >> 28649444

Reverse engineering highlights potential principles of large gene regulatory network design and learning.

Clément Carré1,2, André Mas1, Gabriel Krouk2.   

Abstract

Inferring transcriptional gene regulatory networks from transcriptomic datasets is a key challenge of systems biology, with potential impacts ranging from medicine to agronomy. There are several techniques used presently to experimentally assay transcription factors to target relationships, defining important information about real gene regulatory networks connections. These techniques include classical ChIP-seq, yeast one-hybrid, or more recently, DAP-seq or target technologies. These techniques are usually used to validate algorithm predictions. Here, we developed a reverse engineering approach based on mathematical and computer simulation to evaluate the impact that this prior knowledge on gene regulatory networks may have on training machine learning algorithms. First, we developed a gene regulatory networks-simulating engine called FRANK (Fast Randomizing Algorithm for Network Knowledge) that is able to simulate large gene regulatory networks (containing 104 genes) with characteristics of gene regulatory networks observed in vivo. FRANK also generates stable or oscillatory gene expression directly produced by the simulated gene regulatory networks. The development of FRANK leads to important general conclusions concerning the design of large and stable gene regulatory networks harboring scale free properties (built ex nihilo). In combination with supervised (accepting prior knowledge) support vector machine algorithm we (i) address biologically oriented questions concerning our capacity to accurately reconstruct gene regulatory networks and in particular we demonstrate that prior-knowledge structure is crucial for accurate learning, and (ii) draw conclusions to inform experimental design to performed learning able to solve gene regulatory networks in the future. By demonstrating that our predictions concerning the influence of the prior-knowledge structure on support vector machine learning capacity holds true on real data (Escherichia coli K14 network reconstruction using network and transcriptomic data), we show that the formalism used to build FRANK can to some extent be a reasonable model for gene regulatory networks in real cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28649444      PMCID: PMC5481436          DOI: 10.1038/s41540-017-0019-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl        ISSN: 2056-7189


  41 in total

1.  Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks.

Authors:  E Ravasz; A L Somera; D A Mongru; Z N Oltvai; A L Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A gene-centered C. elegans protein-DNA interaction network.

Authors:  Bart Deplancke; Arnab Mukhopadhyay; Wanyuan Ao; Ahmed M Elewa; Christian A Grove; Natalia J Martinez; Reynaldo Sequerra; Lynn Doucette-Stamm; John S Reece-Hoyes; Ian A Hope; Heidi A Tissenbaum; Susan E Mango; Albertha J M Walhout
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Gene regulatory network inference: data integration in dynamic models-a review.

Authors:  Michael Hecker; Sandro Lambeck; Susanne Toepfer; Eugene van Someren; Reinhard Guthke
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Genome-wide identification of CCA1 targets uncovers an expanded clock network in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Dawn H Nagel; Colleen J Doherty; Jose L Pruneda-Paz; Robert J Schmitz; Joseph R Ecker; Steve A Kay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA-binding specificity and in vivo targets of Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear factor I.

Authors:  Christina M Whittle; Elena Lazakovitch; Richard M Gronostajski; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Inference of quantitative models of bacterial promoters from time-series reporter gene data.

Authors:  Diana Stefan; Corinne Pinel; Stéphane Pinhal; Eugenio Cinquemani; Johannes Geiselmann; Hidde de Jong
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference.

Authors:  Daniel Marbach; James C Costello; Robert Küffner; Nicole M Vega; Robert J Prill; Diogo M Camacho; Kyle R Allison; Manolis Kellis; James J Collins; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Regulatory analysis of the C. elegans genome with spatiotemporal resolution.

Authors:  Carlos L Araya; Trupti Kawli; Anshul Kundaje; Lixia Jiang; Beijing Wu; Dionne Vafeados; Robert Terrell; Peter Weissdepp; Louis Gevirtzman; Daniel Mace; Wei Niu; Alan P Boyle; Dan Xie; Lijia Ma; John I Murray; Valerie Reinke; Robert H Waterston; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Supervised, semi-supervised and unsupervised inference of gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Stefan R Maetschke; Piyush B Madhamshettiwar; Melissa J Davis; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  "Hit-and-Run" transcription: de novo transcription initiated by a transient bZIP1 "hit" persists after the "run".

Authors:  Joan Doidy; Ying Li; Benjamin Neymotin; Molly B Edwards; Kranthi Varala; David Gresham; Gloria M Coruzzi
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Using extremal events to characterize noisy time series.

Authors:  Eric Berry; Bree Cummins; Robert R Nerem; Lauren M Smith; Steven B Haase; Tomas Gedeon
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Decoding the IGF1 signaling gene regulatory network behind alveologenesis from a mouse model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Changgong Li; Susan M Smith; Neil Peinado; Golenaz Kohbodi; Evelyn Tran; Yong-Hwee Eddie Loh; Wei Li; Zea Borok; Parviz Minoo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 8.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.