Literature DB >> 28648921

Karyomapping: a single centre's experience from application of methodology to ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates.

Jara Ben-Nagi1, Dagan Wells2, Karen Doye3, Kalliopi Loutradi3, Holly Exeter3, Emily Drew3, Samer Alfarawati2, Roy Naja2, Paul Serhal3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether karyomapping can be applied to couples requiring preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorder (SGD) and/or chromosomal rearrangement. 75/82 (91.5%) and 6/82 (7.3%) couples were referred for autosomal SGD and X-linked disease, respectively. One couple (1.2%) was referred for SGD and chromosomal rearrangement. Of 608 embryos, 146 (24%, 95% CI 21-28) day-3 and 462 (76%, 95% CI 72-79) blastocyst biopsies were performed. A total of 81 embryo transfers were performed; 16/81 (20%) were following day-3 embryo biopsy, 65/81 (80%) were following blastocyst biopsy and cryopreserved embryo transfer. Of 81 embryo transfers with known pregnancy outcome, 51 (63%, 95% CI 52-73) were on-going pregnancies, 6/81 (7%, 95% CI 3-15) resulted in first trimester miscarriages and 24/81 (30%, 95% CI 21-40) were failed implantations. Of the 51 on-going pregnancies, 15 (29%, 95% CI 19-43) couples had a singleton live birth at the time of write up. There have been no reports of abnormal prenatal, genetic testing or diagnosis of phenotype at birth. Karyomapping is reliable, efficient and accurate for couples requiring PGD for SGD and/or chromosomal rearrangement. Additionally, it provides aneuploidy screening, minimising risks of miscarriage and implantation failure.
Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo biopsy; Karyomapping; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28648921     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  10 in total

1.  Off the street phasing (OTSP): no hassle haplotype phasing for molecular PGD applications.

Authors:  David A Zeevi; Fouad Zahdeh; Yehuda Kling; Shai Carmi; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Live births following preimplantation genetic testing for dynamic mutation diseases by karyomapping: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Dayuan Shi; Jiawei Xu; Wenbin Niu; Yidong Liu; Hao Shi; Guidong Yao; Senlin Shi; Gang Li; Wenyan Song; Haixia Jin; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Efstathios Theodorou; Benjamin P Jones; Daniella F Cardenas Armas; Carleen Heath; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben-Nagi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Polygenic risk scoring of human embryos: a qualitative study of media coverage.

Authors:  Tiny Pagnaer; Maria Siermann; Pascal Borry; Olga Tšuiko
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 2.834

5.  Karyomapping in preimplantation genetic testing for β-thalassemia combined with HLA matching: a systematic summary.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Bao-Min Lu; Rong Li; Jing Guo; Yan Xu; Jia-Fu Pan; Yan-Hong Zeng; Can-Quan Zhou; Yan-Wen Xu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Clinical application of an NGS-based method in the preimplantation genetic testing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Yixin Ren; Ying Lian; Zhiqiang Yan; Fan Zhai; Ming Yang; Xiaohui Zhu; Yuqian Wang; Yanli Nie; Shuo Guan; Ying Kuo; Jin Huang; Xiaodan Shi; Jialin Jia; Jie Qiao; Liying Yan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.357

7.  Reproductive outcomes from ten years of elective oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Lorraine S Kasaven; Benjamin P Jones; Carleen Heath; Rabi Odia; Joycelia Green; Aviva Petrie; Srdjan Saso; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben Nagi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Clinical utility of combined preimplantation genetic testing methods in couples at risk of passing on beta thalassemia/hemoglobin E disease: A retrospective review from a single center.

Authors:  Chonthicha Satirapod; Matchuporn Sukprasert; Bhakbhoom Panthan; Angkana Charoenyingwattana; Pawares Chitayanan; Wasun Chantratita; Wicharn Choktanasiri; Objoon Trachoo; Suradej Hongeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Live birth rate is associated with oocyte yield and number of biopsied and suitable blastocysts to transfer in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles for monogenic disorders and chromosomal structural rearrangements.

Authors:  Jara Ben-Nagi; Benjamin Jones; Roy Naja; Ahmed Amer; Sesh Sunkara; Sioban SenGupta; Paul Serhal
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-06-01

10.  Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: motivations, concerns, and perceptions in a UK population.

Authors:  Benjamin P Jones; Timothy Bracewell-Milnes; Lorraine Kasaven; Ariadne L'Heveder; Megan Spearman; Diana Marcus; Maria Jalmbrant; Joy Green; Rabi Odia; Srdjan Saso; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben Nagi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.