Literature DB >> 28648740

Patellofemoral morphology and alignment: reference values and dose-response patterns for the relation to MRI features of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

E M Macri1, D T Felson2, Y Zhang3, A Guermazi4, F W Roemer5, K M Crossley6, K M Khan7, J J Stefanik8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to (1) determine reference values for trochlear morphology and patellofemoral (PF) alignment in adults without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined PF full thickness cartilage damage or knee pain; and (2) evaluate dose-response patterns for these measures with prevalent MRI-defined PF structural damage and/or knee pain.
DESIGN: The Framingham Community Cohort is a population-based sample of ambulatory adults aged ≥50 years. We evaluated six morphology and alignment measures using MRI (n = 985), and reported reference values (mean ± 2SD) in a subsample without MRI-defined PF full thickness cartilage damage or knee pain (n = 563). With restricted cubic spline Poisson regression, we evaluated dose-response patterns of each of the six measures with prevalent MRI-defined PF structural damage or joint pain. Our primary outcome was full thickness cartilage damage.
RESULTS: For dose-response curves, prevalence ratios (PR) increased monotonically for all measures except patellar tilt, which rose with both lateral and medial tilt. Associations were generally strongest in the lateral PF compartment. PR for the strongest predictors of full thickness cartilage damage reached clinical relevance (PR > 1.5) at sulcus angle (SA) ≥135.0°; patellar tilt angle at ≤1.0° and ≥15.0°; and bisect offset ≥57.0%. Lateral trochlear inclination (LTI) achieved PR > 1.5 at ≤23.0° for full thickness cartilage damage with pain.
CONCLUSIONS: SA, patellar tilt, and bisect offset were most strongly associated with full thickness cartilage damage. LTI, patellar tilt and bisect offset had stronger associations with the addition of pain. These findings contribute to better identifying a subset of patients who may benefit from mechanically based interventions.
Copyright © 2017 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Dose–response; Morphology; Normative data; Patellofemoral osteoarthritis; Reference values

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28648740      PMCID: PMC5605424          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  46 in total

1.  Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination-initial experience.

Authors:  Y Carrillon; H Abidi; D Dejour; O Fantino; B Moyen; V A Tran-Minh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings.

Authors:  Peter R Kornaat; Johan L Bloem; Ruth Y T Ceulemans; Naghmeh Riyazi; Frits R Rosendaal; Rob G Nelissen; Wayne O Carter; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Margreet Kloppenburg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips.

Authors:  Marianne Lepage-Saucier; Cécile Thiéry; Ahmed Larbi; Frédéric E Lecouvet; Bruno C Vande Berg; Patrick Omoumi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Teratogenicity of high vitamin A intake.

Authors:  K J Rothman; L L Moore; M R Singer; U S Nguyen; S Mannino; A Milunsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The association of cartilage volume with knee pain.

Authors:  D J Hunter; L March; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  The range of bone density in normal British women.

Authors:  M L Hall; J Heavens; I D Cullum; P J Ell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Is Tibiofemoral or Patellofemoral Alignment or Trochlear Morphology Associated With Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Joshua J Stefanik; Karim K Khan; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Femoral sulcus angle and increased patella facet cartilage volume in an osteoarthritic population.

Authors:  M Davies-Tuck; A J Teichtahl; A E Wluka; Y Wang; D M Urquhart; J Cui; F M Cicuttini
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Changes in patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint cartilage damage and bone marrow lesions over 7 years: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  J J Stefanik; A Guermazi; F W Roemer; G Peat; J Niu; N A Segal; C E Lewis; M Nevitt; D T Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  8 in total

1.  Does patellar alignment or trochlear morphology predict worsening of patellofemoral disease within the first 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Brooke E Patterson; Kay M Crossley; Josh J Stefanik; Ali Guermazi; Evelina Blomqwist; Karim M Khan; Tim S Whitehead; Hayden G Morris; Adam G Culvenor
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Relation of Patellofemoral Joint Alignment, Morphology, and Radiographic Osteoarthritis to Frequent Anterior Knee Pain: Data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Tuhina Neogi; Irina Tolstykh; Rafael Widjajahakim; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Michael C Nevitt; Michael Roux; Joshua J Stefanik
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Worsening Knee Osteoarthritis Features on Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1 to 5 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brooke E Patterson; Adam G Culvenor; Christian J Barton; Ali Guermazi; Joshua J Stefanik; Hayden G Morris; Timothy S Whitehead; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Alignment differs between patellofemoral osteoarthritis cases and matched controls: An upright 3D MRI study.

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Agnes G d'Entremont; Kay M Crossley; Harvi F Hart; Bruce B Forster; David R Wilson; Charles R Ratzlaff; Charlie H Goldsmith; Karim M Khan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Arthroscopic Debridement, Facetectomy, and Synovectomy for Isolated Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-12-22

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined Osteoarthritis Features and Anterior Knee Pain in Individuals With, or at Risk for, Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Study on Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Tuhina Neogi; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Frank Roemer; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; John A Lynch; Irina Tolstykh; S Reza Jafarzadeh; Joshua J Stefanik
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.178

7.  Clinical findings in patellofemoral osteoarthritis compared to individually-matched controls: a pilot study.

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Kay M Crossley; Harvi F Hart; Agnes G d'Entremont; Bruce B Forster; Charles R Ratzlaff; David R Wilson; Karim M Khan
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-12-09

8.  Patellar instability MRI measurements are associated with knee joint degeneration after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  Paula Giesler; Frederic A Baumann; Dominik Weidlich; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Matthias Jung; Christian Holwein; Julia Schneider; Alexandra S Gersing; Andreas B Imhoff; Fabian Bamberg; Pia M Jungmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.