Literature DB >> 28648391

Role of Global Longitudinal Strain in the Prediction of Outcome in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Bastian Fries1, Dan Liu1, Philipp Gaudron1, Kai Hu1, Peter Nordbeck1, Georg Ertl1, Frank Weidemann2, Sebastian Herrmann3.   

Abstract

In the present study, we assessed the role of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) as a predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), irrespective of their type of treatment. Data of 807 patients with AS receiving complete echocardiographic and clinical examination were retrospectively analyzed. Valve area <1 cm2 and sufficient image quality were inclusion criteria; patients with severe concomitant valvulopathy were excluded. Patients were grouped into treatment (aortic valve replacement [AVR]) and conservative (non-AVR) groups. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to assess predictors of all-cause mortality. Five hundred fourteen patients were included and 53.3% were of male gender. Mean age at inclusion was 76.4 ± 9.8 years; 326 received AVR. Death from any cause occurred in 72.9% of non-AVR group and 17.8% of AVR group (p <0.001). GLS (expressed as |%|) was found to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in non-AVR group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.933, 95% CI 0.854 to 0.987, p = 0.038). In patients receiving AVR, GLS and history of coronary artery bypass graft were found to be independent predictors of all-cause mortality (HR for GLS 0.912, 95% CI 0.730 to 0.999, p = 0.048; HR for coronary artery bypass graft 2.977, 95% CI 1.014 to 6.273, p = 0.013). In non-AVR patients, GLS <9.7% showed a higher 1- and 5-year mortality (log rank p values of 0.002 and 0.010, respectively). In conclusion, GLS is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in severe AS, irrespective of their type of treatment. GLS <9.7% indicates a significantly higher 1- and 5-year mortality in non-AVR patients. Therefore, GLS should be regularly assessed for enhanced risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28648391     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Improvements in global longitudinal strain after transcatheter aortic valve replacement according to race.

Authors:  Aamir H Twing; Brody Slostad; Christina Anderson; Sreenivas Konda; Elliott M Groves; Mayank M Kansal
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks.

Authors:  Kazunori Okada; Sanae Kaga; Minami Araki; Kosuke Tsujita; Ayaka Yoshikawa; Mizuki Hara; Yoichi Sakamoto; Nobuo Masauzi; Taisei Mikami
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  Aortic Stenosis: New Insights in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention.

Authors:  Saki Ito; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.101

4.  Distribution and prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jonas Agerlund Povlsen; Vibeke Guldbrand Rasmussen; Henrik Vase; Kaare Troels Jensen; Christian Juhl Terkelsen; Evald Høj Christiansen; Mariann Tang; Anders Lehmann Dahl Pedersen; Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Arterial Hypertension in Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Christian Basile; Ilaria Fucile; Maria Lembo; Maria Virginia Manzi; Federica Ilardi; Anna Franzone; Costantino Mancusi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.