Literature DB >> 28647719

A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and associated risk factors for workplace violence against Chinese nurses.

Lei Shi1, Danyang Zhang2, Chenyu Zhou1, Libin Yang3, Tao Sun1, Tianjun Hao4, Xiangwen Peng2, Lei Gao1, Wenhui Liu3, Yi Mu5, Yuzhen Han6, Lihua Fan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to explore the characteristics of workplace violence that Chinese nurses at tertiary and county-level hospitals encountered in the 12 months from December 2014 to January 2016, to identify and analyse risk factors for workplace violence, and to establish the basis for future preventive strategies.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
SETTING: A total of 44 tertiary hospitals and 90 county-level hospitals in 16 provinces (municipalities or autonomous regions) in China.
METHODS: We used stratified random sampling to collect data from December 2014 to January 2016. We distributed 21 360 questionnaires, and 15 970 participants provided valid data (effective response rate=74.77%). We conducted binary logistic regression analyses on the risk factors for workplace violence among the nurses in our sample and analysed the reasons for aggression.
RESULTS: The prevalence of workplace violence was 65.8%; of this, 64.9% was verbal violence, and physical violence and sexual harassment accounted for 11.8% and 3.9%, respectively. Frequent workplace violence occurred primarily in emergency and paediatric departments. Respondents reported that patients' relatives were the main perpetrators in tertiary and county-level hospitals. Logistic regression analysis showed that respondents' age, department, years of experience and direct contact with patients were common risk factors at different levels of hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: Workplace violence is frequent in China's tertiary and county-level hospitals; its occurrence is especially frequent in the emergency and paediatric departments. It is necessary to cope with workplace violence by developing effective control strategies at individual, hospital and national levels. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  general and public hospitals; nurses; risk factors; workplace violence (WPV)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28647719      PMCID: PMC5623406          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


We used a large, nurse-based sample in our study. Sample selection was reasonable and representative, and was distributed in the eastern, middle and western regions of China. Our study compared differences between nurses who had experienced workplace violence in comprehensive public tertiary and county–level hospitals. The study provides the basis for establishing operational guidelines for preventing workplace violence in China. The retrospective approach to self-reported workplace violence used by respondents may cause recall bias.

Background

Workplace violence (WPV) towards health service professionals is recognised as a global public health issue, and it has attracted worldwide attention.1–4 Previous studies have suggested that health professionals have a higher risk of experiencing WPV than any other professionals.2 3 Further, the incidence rate of WPV differs among nurses in various countries; for instance, the incidence was 76.0% in Greece, 82% in Pakistan and 67% in Italy.5 6 Several substantial studies have suggested that nurses have a high risk of experiencing WPV.6–10 During the past 12 months, the incidence rate of physical violence for nurses in Ethiopia,7 South Korea,8 Jordan,9 Germany10 and Iran3 ranged from 18.22% to 56.0%, the verbal abuse rate being from 63.8% to 89.58% and the sexual harassment rate from 4.7% to 19.7%. WPV occurs primarily in the emergency wards and psychiatric departments of hospitals.11 12 Research into the experience of nurses in these departments in the USA,13 Switzerland14 and Jordan15 has demonstrated that they experience a higher incidence of WPV than do nurses in other departments. In China, WPV in hospitals has increased gradually over the past few decades. According to the report from the Chinese Hospital Association, the proportion of hospitals experiencing WPV increased from 90% in 2008 to 96% in 2012, and the prevalence of sexual harassment has increased year by year.16 Most previous studies of WPV against nurses in China have been conducted in the provinces, and the samples are not sufficiently representative: they do not present an accurate picture of the incidence of WPV against nurses in Chinese general hospitals.17–19 In this study, WPV was divided into physical violence and psychological violence, which includes verbal violence and sexual harassment in accordance with the definition of WPV in hospitals used by the WHO, the International Labour Office (ILO) and the specific situation in China. Although violent incidents in hospitals directly harm healthcare workers and hospitals, the ultimate victims are the patients.20 WPV affects the normal functioning and reputation of hospitals and threatens the personal safety of healthcare workers and patients.21 Moreover, violent incidents have a negative impact on the psychological welfare of healthcare workers22 who do not want their children to be engaged in healthcare.23 The purpose of the present study was to explore the distribution and characteristics of WPV experienced by Chinese nurses at tertiary and county–level hospitals in the 12 months from December 2014 to January 2016, to identify and analyse the risk factors for WPV, thus providing a basis for future preventive strategies.

Methods

Sample and procedure

A cross–sectional survey was designed based on the geographical location and level of economic development in the eastern (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong, Guangdong, Liaoning), middle (Shanxi, Henan, Anhui, Hunan, Heilongjiang) and western (Ningxia, Shannxi, Gansu, Sichuan, Chongqing) regions of China. In 2015, there were 3069 general and public hospitals in China and approximately 920 700 registered nurses in public tertiary and county–level hospitals. We selected a sample of 21 360, approximately 2.30% of all nurses. In order to select the same proportion of the workforce from each department, we sought to recruit 120 nurses from the departments of internal medicine and surgery, 80 nurses from the departments of emergency, neurology, obstetrics and gynaecology, and paediatrics, and 40 nurses from the departments of stomatology, ophthalmology, and ear, nose and throat in each tertiary hospital. We distributed 10 560 questionnaires to 44 tertiary hospitals. We sought to recruit nurses at county–level hospitals in the same proportions: 60 from the departments of internal medicine and surgery, 40 from the departments of emergency, neurology, obstetrics and gynaecology, and paediatrics, and 20 from the departments of stomatology, ophthalmology, and ear, nose and throat at each county–level hospital. We distributed 10 800 questionnaires to the 90 county–level hospitals. All 134 hospitals agreed to participate in the study. The inclusion criteria for participants were voluntary participation by nurses engaged in clinical work who had at least 1 year of professional experience in hospitals. The survey was conducted from December 2014 to January 2016. We obtained permission from the managers and human resources departments of the hospitals. The researchers used a stratified random sampling method to collect the data. Each participant had 2 days to complete the self-administered questionnaire. Collected data were kept confidential and used only for academic research. We distributed 21 360 questionnaires and received 15 970 valid questionnaires (effective response rate=74.77%).

Questionnaire

We developed the questionnaire based on three documents. First, we used the revised Survey of Violence Experienced by Staff (SOVES-G-R) developed by Hahn et al to formulate the questionnaire.24 The revised SOVES-G-R was used to measure perpetrators’ characteristics and the way to deal with violence for nurses. Next, we used items from the Chinese version of the Workplace Violence Scale in the literature (the frequency of violence, different levels of the severity of physical violence, and hospital attitudes to WPV and intervention strategies) to develop the questionnaire.25 Chen and Wang’s study incorporated the levels of the severity of physical violence, and hospital attitudes to WPV and intervention strategies. In addition, we used the questionnaires from the ILO, ICN (International Council of Nurses), WHO and PSI (Public Services International) joint programme for measuring WPV (eg, types of WPV, time and place the violence occurred, and perceptions and attitudes of nurses towards WPV).26 We pre-tested the questionnaire with 367 nurses from three public tertiary and two public county–level hospitals in Heilongjiang Province and revised the questionnaire after the test. Further, we invited 18 healthcare related experts to assess the accuracy, comprehensiveness and sensitivity of the items in the questionnaire. In order to ensure the reliability of the revised questionnaire according to expert opinion, we selected 835 nurses from five public tertiary and four public county–level hospitals in Heilongjiang Province to measure the reliability of the questionnaire again. We measured the questionnaire’s reliability twice using SPSS19.0; Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.84 and 0.86, respectively.

Data analysis

EpiData V.3.1 was used to establish the study’s database. To ensure accuracy, the data were checked by trained personnel after all surveys were completed and entered. We used IBM SPSS19.0 and Excel for statistical analysis of the relevant quantitative data. Univariate analysis and χ2 tests (χ2 tests were used to analyse the relationship between the demographic characteristics of respondents and the incidence rate of WPV). We employed logistic regression analysis to test the relationship between nurses experiencing hospital WPV as the dependent variable, and the variables with statistical and clinical practice significance as the covariates. We conducted binary logistic regression analyses on the risk factors for WPV among the nurses in our sample. OR and 95% CI were calculated; α=0.05 was the test and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval to undertake this study was granted by the research ethics committee of Harbin Medical University in March 2014. We obtained consent from each hospital involved in the research processes. All participants gave informed consent to the researchers or to their head nurses before the survey, and participants' personal information was kept confidential.

Results

Participants’ demographic characteristics

We received 17 865 responses, and 15 970 respondents met our inclusion criteria. Most respondents had completed undergraduate studies and were <30 years old; however, the number of female respondents was significantly higher compared with male respondents (table 1).
Table 1

Participants’ demographic characteristics (n=15 970)

CharacteristicTertiary hospitals (n=9142)County–level hospitals (n=6828)Total (n=15 970)
  n %  n %   n %
Gender
 Male2342.61432.13772.4
 Female890897.4668597.915 59397.6
Age (years)
 ≤30513156.1403359.1916457.4
 31–50378541.4261138.2639640.0
 ≥512262.51842.74102.6
Educational level
 Below undergraduate312934.2416160.9729045.6
 Undergraduate591064.6266339.0857353.7
 Master’s or above1031.140.11070.7
Marital status
 Married567862.1429362.9997162.4
 Unmarried334236.6241535.4575736.1
 Divorced or widowed1221.31201.72421.5
Professional title
 Junior624968.4484571.011 09469.5
 Intermediate224224.5158723.2382924.0
 Senior6517.13965.810476.5
Employment form
 Regular staff507755.5333948.9841652.7
 Temporary employee406544.5348951.1755447.3
Average monthly income (RMB)
 ≤3000374741.0491672.0866354.3
 3000–5000449549.2186727.3636239.8
 5000–10 0008729.5420.69145.7
 >10 000280.330.1310.2
Department
 Emergency5145.65227.610366.5
 Internal medicine285031.2196228.7481230.1
 Surgery190320.8138620.3328920.6
 Gynaecology and obstetrics4264.76108.910366.5
 Paediatrics5165.66279.211437.2
 Other293332.1172125.3465429.1
Years of experience
 1–4351138.4312445.7663541.5
 5–10280330.7159723.4440027.6
 11–20153416.8109916.1263316.5
 ≥21129414.1100814.8230214.4
Working time
 0–2 hours1641.8520.82161.3
 2–4 hours2522.81201.83722.3
 4–6 hours2642.91131.63772.4
 6–8 hours371340.6308745.2680042.6
 >8 hours474951.9345650.6820551.4
Direct contact with patients
 0–2 hours1802.01061.62861.8
 2–4 hours2372.62513.74883.0
 4–6 hours7478.25758.413228.3
 6–8 hours797887.2589686.313 87486.9
Participants’ demographic characteristics (n=15 970)

Incidence of exposure to WPV during the past 12 months

In the 12–month survey period, 10 502 nurses experienced WPV. Total prevalence was 65.8%, of which verbal violence accounted for 64.9% (10369/15970), physical violence for 11.8% (1892/15970) and sexual harassment for 3.9% (630/15970). The incidence rate of WPV in the different types of hospitals is shown in table 2.
Table 2

Incidence (%) of exposure to workplace violence

Tertiary hospitalsCounty–level hospitals
TypePhysical violenceVerbal violenceSexual harassmentPhysical violenceVerbal violenceSexual harassment
  n %  n %  n %  n %  n %  n %
104711.5587564.34024.484512.4449465.82283.3
Incidence (%) of exposure to workplace violence

Prevalence of WPV for different demographic variables

Nurses with frequent contact with patients were more likely to experience WPV in both tertiary and county–level hospitals (table 3). There was a significant difference in the incidence rate of WPV among different professional titles for nurses in the tertiary hospitals (χ2 = 6.6, p<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference in county–level hospitals (χ2 = 1.5, p>0.05).
Table 3

Characteristics and frequency distributions for workplace violence

CharacteristicTertiary hospitals (n=9142)County–level hospitals (n=6828)
  n %  χ2  p  n %  χ2  p
Gender
 Male14361.11.80.1818559.43.20.072
 Female582065.3445466.6
Age (years)
 ≤30328364.015.4<0.001267966.415.6<0.001
 31–50254867.3176267.5
 ≥5113258.49853.3
Educational level
 Below undergraduate195862.615.7<0.001270765.19.70.008
 Undergraduate394166.7182968.7
 Master’s or above6462.1375.0
Marital status
 Married381367.227.8<0.001288467.23.30.192
 Unmarried206561.8158165.5
 Divorced or widowed8569.77461.7
Professional title
 Junior402264.46.60.037321766.41.50.482
 Intermediate160771.7106867.3
 Senior43466.725464.1
Employment form
 Regular staff329064.80.90.341221366.30.10.733
 Temporary employee267365.8232666.7
Average monthly income (RMB)
 ≤3000241864.51.40.710327566.60.30.955
 3000–5000295365.7123366.0
 5000–10 00057465.82969.0
 >10 0001864.3266.7
Department
 Emergency41881.3101.2<0.00142982.2158.9<0.001
 Internal medicine188966.3129466.0
 Surgery126666.595568.9
 Gynaecology and obstetrics28466.739164.1
 Paediatrics35168.048377.0
 Other175559.898757.4
Years of experience
 1–4214161.055.0<0.001200664.235.2<0.001
 5–10192068.5114871.9
 11–20106969.775068.2
 ≥2183364.463563.0
Working time
 0–2 hours8753.026.1<0.0013261.567.9<0.001
 2–4 hours15260.37159.2
 4–6 hours16562.55346.9
 6–8 hours236763.7194162.9
 >8 hours319267.2244270.7
Direct contact with patients
 0–2 hours7240.069.8<0.0015249.151.7<0.001
 2–4 hours12753.614457.4
 4–6 hours47463.533057.4
 6–8 hours529066.3401368.1
Characteristics and frequency distributions for workplace violence

Characteristics of perpetrators and victims’ responses

Patients’ relatives were the main perpetrators of WPV in both tertiary (83.1%) and county–level hospitals (85.2%). Most attacks on nurses occurred in the wards and during the day shift. More than 60% of the victims responded with tolerance, patience and understanding (table 4).
Table 4

Characteristics of perpetrators and victims’ responses

Tertiary hospitals (n=5963)County–level hospitals (n=4539)
n%n%
Attack time
 Day shift355859.7292064.3
 Night shift140223.5119526.4
 After work100316.84249.3
Attack site
 Outpatient clinic3886.53517.7
 Ward275446.2193342.6
 Doctor's office1983.32515.5
 Nurse's office or station137223.0129128.5
 Treatment room1272.11623.6
 Other112418.955112.1
When the violent incident took place
 All alone169828.5131929.1
 Other colleagues on the scene426571.5322070.9
Perpetrators*
 Patients178435.9121226.7
 Patients’ relatives413183.1386285.2
 Visitors74815.057312.6
 Other992.0962.1
Gender of the perpetrators*
 Male398881.2338083.1
 Female246150.1191747.1
Age group of the perpetrators (years)*
 ≤202585.12585.7
 21–30145428.8162435.9
 31–40269353.3226350.0
 41–50222044.0152933.8
 51–6091718.2101122.3
 ≥614458.866814.8
Behavioural response to WPV *
 Tolerance and avoidance316764.1260163.3
 Patience and understanding274855.7241558.8
 Give tit for tat801.6360.9
 Try to explain before resorting to force4388.93107.5
 Ask colleagues for help94019.053713.1
 Turn to the managers or security staff for help189938.5133432.5
 Ask for help from other patients and relatives2875.81654.0
 Call the police75415.357314.0
 Other1663.4721.8

*Represents multiple choice.

Characteristics of perpetrators and victims’ responses *Represents multiple choice.

Risk factors associated with WPV against nurses

Participants’ age, department, years of experience and length of time in direct contact with patients were risk factors for WPV against nurses. Binary logistic regression analysis results demonstrated clearly that <8 hours’ working time is a protective factor against WPV for nurses in county–level hospitals. Nurses in emergency departments were almost three times (OR=2.993, 95% CI 2.364 to 3.789) more likely to experience WPV in tertiary hospitals, and 3.387 times (95% CI 2.648 to 4.332) more likely in county–level hospitals than nurses in other departments. Surprisingly, nurses with 5–10 years’ of experience were at the highest risk of WPV in county– level hospitals, while those with 11–20 years’ experience were at the highest risk in tertiary hospitals. Further, our results showed that the likelihood of WPV rises with the length of treatment time in county–level hospitals (table 5).
Table 5

Risk factors associated with workplace violence against nurses in hospitals: binary logistic results*

Variable nameTertiary hospitals (n=9142)County–level hospitals (n=6828)
Adjusted OR95% CIp ValueAdjusted OR95% CIp Value
Age group (years)≥511.0Reference0.0441.0reference0.027
≤301.500(1.092 to 2.061)0.0121.606(1.115 to 2.314)0.011
31–501.387(1.036 to 1.855)0.0281.551(1.120 to 2.146)0.008
DepartmentOther1.0Reference<0.0011.0reference<0.001
Emergency2.993(2.364 to 3.789)<0.0013.387(2.648 to 4.332)<0.001
Internal medicine1.313(1.178 to 1.463)<0.0011.408(1.227 to 1.615)<0.001
Surgery1.341(1.187 to 1.514)<0.0011.644(1.414 to 1.912)<0.001
Gynaecology and obstetrics1.322(1.065 to 1.641)<0.0011.268(1.044 to 1.539)0.016
Paediatrics1.433(1.172 to 1.753)<0.0012.391(1.934 to 2.956)<0.001
Years of experience1–41.0Reference<0.0011.0reference<0.001
5–101.426(1.268 to 1.604)<0.0011.479(1.277 to 1.712)<0.001
11–201.627(1.358 to 1.951)<0.0011.300(1.045 to 1.618)0.018
≥211.368(1.131 to 1.656)0.0011.192(0.949 to 1.498)0.131
Working time (hours)>8 hours1.0reference<0.001
0–2 hours0.852(0.469 to 1.548)0.599
2–4 hours0.762(0.507 to 1.145)0.191
4–6 hours0.492(0.329 to 0.735)0.001
6–8 hours0.720(0.647 to 0.800)<0.001
Direct contact with patients (hours)0–2 hours1.0Reference<0.0011.0reference<0.001
2–4 hours1.832(1.230 to 2.728)0.0031.201(0.744 to 1.938)0.454
4–6 hours2.722(1.939 to 3.819)<0.0011.220(0.785 to 1.895)0.377
6–8 hours3.054(2.247 to 4.152)<0.0011.710(1.134 to 2.580)0.011

*This analysis used data from 44 public tertiary hospitals and 90 public county-level hospitals in China. 

Risk factors associated with workplace violence against nurses in hospitals: binary logistic results* *This analysis used data from 44 public tertiary hospitals and 90 public county-level hospitals in China.

Discussion

Previous studies have found that WPV exists in all hospitals but differs in some aspects.27–31 The total incidence rate of WPV was 65.8% over the 12–month period. This is slightly higher than the figure of 64.48% reported for Guangzhou.32 Compared with previous Chinese studies,17–19 our study provides a comprehensive depiction of the incidence of WPV in Chinese comprehensive public hospitals. We have also documented the characteristics of the perpetrators and the coping style of nurses who experience WPV. This study demonstrated that WPV in China is higher than in other countries.33–36 Moreover, we found that WPV towards nurses was frequent, including verbal violence (64.9%), physical violence (11.8%) and sexual harassment (3.9%). This may be related to the fact that nurses are frequently in direct contact with patients and their relatives in their daily work. The findings also showed that nurses in county–level hospitals are more likely to experience WPV than nurses in tertiary hospitals. This may be related to the level of education of patients and their relatives in county–level hospitals. In addition, the significant agricultural population in China is more likely to receive medical treatment at county-level hospitals, increasing the likelihood of WPV. In short, nurses have a high risk of experiencing WPV in the healthcare sector.37–39 Our survey also revealed that respondents aged 30 years or younger have a higher risk of WPV than their older colleagues. This phenomenon may be attributable to the fact that they have not been nurses for very long, and they lack work experience and communication skills. If that is the case, they need to practice their skills to decrease the odds of making mistakes. Alternatively, because most of the nurses in this age group were single children, they are quick to anger when criticised by patients and their relatives, increasing the possibility of WPV. In contrast, nurses aged 51 years or older had a lower risk of WPV. This may be related to inherent respect for the elderly, a traditional virtue of the Chinese nation for thousands of years.40 As shown in our survey, the risk of WPV was not the same in different departments. Substantial previous studies have found that emergency departments are likely to have the highest incidence of WPV, followed by paediatric departments.24 41 This increased risk may be because emergency departments deal with the most serious patients in complex situations, such as traffic accidents, food poisoning and patients with alcoholism. Further, patients’ relatives may be very worried, and if nurses do not share information with patients and if the nurses’ communication skills are inadequate, unnecessary conflicts may emerge. Paediatrics is another specialist department with a high risk of WPV. In China, all patients <14 years of age are treated in paediatrics departments. The age range is different in countries around the world. The high risk of WPV in paediatric departments may be because patients are likely to be their parents’ only child, and to have been overindulged. This may make nurses’ work more difficult and increase the possibility of WPV. Therefore, hospitals and patients should make joint efforts to reduce violent incidents. On the one hand, hospitals can establish a code green response team, comprising a charge nurse, security personnel and primary nurse to manage any potentially violent situation. Dilman’s study demonstrated that 85% of code green calls resulted in successful resolution of the violent incidents.42 Preventive measures for WPV among nurses include the following: increase awareness of potentially violent patients; wear suitable clothes; maintain proper positioning when communicating with patients; keep a safe distance; maintain the correct posture; and listen actively. A study by Hill et al showed a 65% reduction in staff injuries, from 2.2 per week to 0.77 per week, during the 1 year intervention period.43 On the other hand, patients and their relatives should show respect to others and understand that nurses’ work is complex and professional. With mutual understanding, nurses and patients can help to improve the nurse-patient relationship and achieve harmony. Stievano et al’s study has shown that patient care can be affected when nurses are not respected.44 This study also demonstrated that years of experience and extended direct contact with patients are risk factors for WPV. Medical treatment processes, waiting time for patients, nurses’ attitudes and other aspects of hospital procedure need improvement to enhance patients’ satisfaction and reduce conflict. Previous studies have shown that strengthening hospital management can improve patient satisfaction.45 Perpetrators’ characteristics are equally noteworthy. In the present study, perpetrators were primarily patients’ family members, followed by patients. Perpetrators were usually men, aged 31–50 years with an inverted ‘U’ shape distribution. The ward was the main site of WPV in hospitals, accounting for 46.2% and 42.6% in tertiary and county–level hospitals, respectively. Ward management needs strengthening; for example, surveillance cameras and alarms should be installed in hospital ward corridors, lights should be sufficiently bright in work areas during the night, and so on. Fine safety management can significantly improve the quality of nursing and patients’ satisfaction, and reduce conflict.46 Although most patients and patients’ relatives are well behaved, a few have underhand motives. Such people intentionally disrupt the normal medical order, and even pose a threat to the personal safety of medical staff and other patients, in order to seek monetary compensation. In China, a few years ago, the cost of ‘Yi Nao’ (where  in people employed by those in dispute with the hospital, together with family members of patients, took various measures to put pressure on the hospital, thereby profiteering) was very low. Occasionally, patients and their relatives may use illegal organisations to ask the hospitals for compensation directly, rather than use the normal legal procedures. Hospitals often make concessions by acquiescing to some unreasonable requirements to avoid trouble, preserve their reputation, and ensure normal medical order. This response has further contributed to the arrogance of those resorting to ‘Yi Nao’. Fortunately, ‘Yi Nao’ was officially criminalised in November 2015. The law now recognises that ‘Yi Nao’ risks the proper functioning of medical institutions and gives clear legal support to conviction and sentencing. Negative media coverage  also had a huge impact on the nurse–patient relationship. Therefore, we suggest that the government should supervise the media to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of media coverage. We further advise hospitals to strengthen the training and management of nurses to reduce the physical and psychological damage to them from WPV. For instance, hospitals could provide violence–related training for nurses and provide post-WPV psychological support or a ‘debriefing room,’ instruct all staff about the value of nurses and foster nurses’ pride in their work and develop an excellent hospital culture. If nurses have the support of managers, they may be more willing to consult psychologists, psychiatrists and mental health professionals to identify and treat any sudden disorder.47 We were surprised by victims’ coping mechanisms, which were tolerance, avoidance, patience, and understanding in both tertiary and county–level hospitals. This response may reflect a culture of tolerance toward WPV in China. Most nurses turned to their managers or hospital security personnel for help when they experienced WPV. Thus the organisation’s support and care may have significant potential for reducing the harm inflicted on nurses by WPV. Nurses should be familiar with all of the resources in their work and family communities for solving any problems and should keep themselves in good mental health.47 The present study has several limitations. First, we collected data about whether nurses had experienced WPV over the previous 12 months, so there may have been recall bias in the results. Second, we studied tertiary and county–level hospitals, but we did not study specialised hospitals. However, this study might be effective in preventing WPV in general and public hospitals. In general, WPV can be prevented, according to the WHO’s report on violence and health.26 Therefore, to reduce violent incidents, we recommend that tertiary and county–level hospitals develop training against violence that is tailored to their particular situation, as well as the other measures we have suggested above. We also suggest improving psychological resilience for at-risk nurses to mitigate the negative impact of WPV and to prevent chronic diseases and reduce the incidence of mental illness.48

Conclusions

This study is based on a large sample survey of WPV in tertiary and county–level hospitals in China. The study has demonstrated that there is a high incidence rate of WPV and that occupational safety is insufficient. The frequent occurrence of WPV in emergency and paediatric departments is also remarkable. The incidence of WPV of hospitals is an occupational health hazard and a serious threat to the well being of nurses.
  35 in total

1.  Occupational stress in nurses in psychiatric institutions in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hsiu-Chuan Shen; Yawen Cheng; Perng-Jy Tsai; Su-hsing S Lee; Yueliang Leon Guo
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Occupational violence in general practice: a whole-of-practice problem. Results of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Parker J Magin; Jenny May; Patrick McElduff; Susan M Goode; Jon Adams; Georgina L Cotter
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Violence against nurses in the triage area: An Italian qualitative study.

Authors:  Nicola Ramacciati; Andrea Ceccagnoli; Beniamino Addey
Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.142

4.  Physical assault, physical threat, and verbal abuse perpetrated against hospital workers by patients or visitors in six U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Lisa A Pompeii; Ashley L Schoenfisch; Hester J Lipscomb; John M Dement; Claudia D Smith; Mudita Upadhyaya
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  The influence of personal dispositional factors and organizational resources on workplace violence, burnout, and health outcomes in new graduate nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Heather K Spence Laschinger; Ashley L Grau
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  The Frequency, Contributing and Preventive Factors of Harassment towards Health Professionals in Iran.

Authors:  Masoud Fallahi Khoshknab; Fatemeh Oskouie; Nahid Ghazanfari; Fereshteh Najafi; Zahra Tamizi; Shahla Afshani; Ghazal Azadi
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2015-07

7.  Evaluation of outpatient service quality in Eastern Saudi Arabia. Patient's expectations and perceptions.

Authors:  Khalid J Al Fraihi; Shahid A Latif
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Prevalence of workplace violence in Northwest Ethiopia: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Bewket Tadesse Tiruneh; Berhanu Boru Bifftu; Akililu Azazh Tumebo; Mengistu Mekonnen Kelkay; Degefaye Zelalem Anlay; Berihun Assefa Dachew
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-07-08

Review 9.  Prevalence of violence towards nursing staff in Slovenian nursing homes.

Authors:  Branko Gabrovec; Ivan Eržen
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2016-05-10

10.  Workplace violence against physicians and nurses in Palestinian public hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohamad Kitaneh; Motasem Hamdan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  26 in total

1.  Prevalence, characteristics, and consequences of verbal and physical violence against healthcare staff in Chinese hospitals during 2010-2020.

Authors:  Chen Jia; Yijing Han; Wenping Lu; Ruofan Li; Weizheng Liu; Jianan Jiang
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  Effect of second child intent on delivery mode after Chinese two child policy implementation: a cross sectional and prospective observational study of nulliparous women in Chongqing.

Authors:  Jianlin Zhao; Nan Shan; Xiaochang Yang; Qin Li; Yinyin Xia; Hua Zhang; Hongbo Qi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Workplace violence, job satisfaction, burnout, perceived organisational support and their effects on turnover intention among Chinese nurses in tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wenhui Liu; Shihong Zhao; Lei Shi; Zhong Zhang; Xinyan Liu; Li Li; Xiaojian Duan; Guoqiang Li; Fengge Lou; Xiaoli Jia; Lihua Fan; Tao Sun; Xin Ni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Verbal and Non-Verbal Aggression in a Swiss University Emergency Room: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Dominic Kaeser; Rebekka Guerra; Osnat Keidar; Urs Lanz; Michael Moses; Christian Kobel; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Meret E Ricklin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Prevalence of sexual harassment of nurses and nursing students in China: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Liang-Nan Zeng; Qian-Qian Zong; Ji-Wen Zhang; Li Lu; Feng-Rong An; Chee H Ng; Gabor S Ungvari; Fang-Yu Yang; Teris Cheung; Ligang Chen; Yu-Tao Xiang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 6.580

6.  General Perception of Doctor-Patient Relationship From Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yanan Zhou; Shubao Chen; Yanhui Liao; Qiuxia Wu; Yuejiao Ma; Dongfang Wang; Xuyi Wang; Manyun Li; Yunfei Wang; Yingying Wang; Yueheng Liu; Tieqiao Liu; Winson Fu Zun Yang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-07-06

7.  Mediating role of coping styles on anxiety in healthcare workers victim of violence: a cross-sectional survey in China hospitals.

Authors:  Yuanshuo Ma; Yongchen Wang; Yu Shi; Lei Shi; Licheng Wang; Zhe Li; Guoqiang Li; Yafeng Zhang; Lihua Fan; Xin Ni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Fear of future workplace violence and its influencing factors among nurses in Shandong, China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chang Fu; Yaru Ren; Guowen Wang; Xiuxin Shi; Fenglin Cao
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-07-07

9.  Workplace violence and its aftermath in China's health sector: implications from a cross-sectional survey across three tiers of the health system.

Authors:  Sheng Zhi Yang; Dan Wu; Nan Wang; Therese Hesketh; Kai Sing Sun; Lu Li; Xudong Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China during 2013-2015: a cross-sectional survey of the associated factors.

Authors:  Jing Hua Zhang; Xinxin Peng; Chengkun Liu; Yijun Chen; Hongmin Zhang; Ojo Olukayode Iwaloye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.