George A Kelley1, Kristi S Kelley2. 1. Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States. Electronic address: gkelley@hsc.wvu.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States. Electronic address: kskelley@hsc.wvu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While a recent meta-analysis of observational studies reported a statistically significant association between sarcopenia and both all-cause mortality and functional decline, a recently developed inverse heterogeneity (IVhet) model has been shown to be more valid than the traditional random-effects model used. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this short report was to use a previous meta-analysis to compare the two approaches. METHODS: Aggregate data meta-analysis of prospective observational studies conducted in any setting. Men and women 60years of age and older in which all-cause mortality (12 studies, 14,169 participants) or functional decline (6 studies, 8561 participants) was assessed. Using the IVhet model, pooling of previous studies regarding the association between sarcopenia and all-cause mortality as well as functional decline. Absolute and relative differences between IVhet and random-effects results were also calculated as well as influence analysis with each study deleted once. Non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals (CI) for odds ratios (OR) were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sarcopenia was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality (OR=3.64, 95% CI=2.94 to 4.51) and functional decline (OR=2.58, 95% CI=1.33 to 4.99). Compared to the random-effects model, the OR was slightly higher (0.04 or 1.1%) but with wider CI (0.16 or 11.3%) for all-cause mortality and 0.45 (14.9%) lower with a CI that was 0.34 (10.2%) wider for functional decline. With each study deleted from the model once, results remained statistically significant for both all-cause mortality and functional decline. CONCLUSION: These results provide additional and more accurate evidence in support of an association between sarcopenia and an increased risk for both all-cause mortality and functional decline.
BACKGROUND: While a recent meta-analysis of observational studies reported a statistically significant association between sarcopenia and both all-cause mortality and functional decline, a recently developed inverse heterogeneity (IVhet) model has been shown to be more valid than the traditional random-effects model used. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this short report was to use a previous meta-analysis to compare the two approaches. METHODS: Aggregate data meta-analysis of prospective observational studies conducted in any setting. Men and women 60years of age and older in which all-cause mortality (12 studies, 14,169 participants) or functional decline (6 studies, 8561 participants) was assessed. Using the IVhet model, pooling of previous studies regarding the association between sarcopenia and all-cause mortality as well as functional decline. Absolute and relative differences between IVhet and random-effects results were also calculated as well as influence analysis with each study deleted once. Non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals (CI) for odds ratios (OR) were considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Sarcopenia was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality (OR=3.64, 95% CI=2.94 to 4.51) and functional decline (OR=2.58, 95% CI=1.33 to 4.99). Compared to the random-effects model, the OR was slightly higher (0.04 or 1.1%) but with wider CI (0.16 or 11.3%) for all-cause mortality and 0.45 (14.9%) lower with a CI that was 0.34 (10.2%) wider for functional decline. With each study deleted from the model once, results remained statistically significant for both all-cause mortality and functional decline. CONCLUSION: These results provide additional and more accurate evidence in support of an association between sarcopenia and an increased risk for both all-cause mortality and functional decline.
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Suhail A R Doi; Jan J Barendregt; Shahjahan Khan; Lukman Thalib; Gail M Williams Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Xiao Tan; Olga E Titova; Eva Lindberg; Sölve Elmståhl; Lars Lind; Helgi B Schiöth; Christian Benedict Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Ryan Barnard; Josh Tan; Brandon Roller; Caroline Chiles; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Leon Lenchik Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Kathryn H Schmitz; Catherine M Alfano; Jennifer R Bail; Pamela J Goodwin; Cynthia A Thomson; Don W Bradley; Kerry S Courneya; Christie A Befort; Crystal S Denlinger; Jennifer A Ligibel; William H Dietz; Melinda R Stolley; Melinda L Irwin; Marcas M Bamman; Caroline M Apovian; Bernardine M Pinto; Kathleen Y Wolin; Rachel M Ballard; Andrew J Dannenberg; Elizabeth G Eakin; Matt M Longjohn; Susan D Raffa; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Joanne S Buzaglo; Sharyl J Nass; Greta M Massetti; Erin P Balogh; Elizabeth S Kraft; Anand K Parekh; Darshak M Sanghavi; G Stephen Morris; Karen Basen-Engquist Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 508.702