Literature DB >> 28646751

An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.

Geoffrey Fisher1.   

Abstract

In order to make good decisions, individuals need to identify and properly integrate information about various attributes associated with a choice. Since choices are often complex and made rapidly, they are typically affected by contextual variables that are thought to influence how much attention is paid to different attributes. I propose a modification of the attentional drift-diffusion model, the binary-attribute attentional drift diffusion model (baDDM), which describes the choice process over simple binary-attribute choices and how it is affected by fluctuations in visual attention. Using an eye-tracking experiment, I find the baDDM makes accurate quantitative predictions about several key variables including choices, reaction times, and how these variables are correlated with attention to two attributes in an accept-reject decision. Furthermore, I estimate an attribute-based fixation bias that suggests attention to an attribute increases its subjective weight by 5%, while the unattended attribute's weight is decreased by 10%.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Drift diffusion model; Multi-attribute choice; Preferences; Sequential sampling models

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28646751     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

1.  Mental representations distinguish value-based decisions from perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Ian Krajbich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 2.  Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation predicts multi-alternative risky choice behaviour.

Authors:  Felix Molter; Armin W Thomas; Scott A Huettel; Hauke R Heekeren; Peter N C Mohr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 4.  Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Dennison; Daniel Sazhin; David V Smith
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02-08

5.  Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Dianna R Amasino; Nicolette J Sullivan; Rachel E Kranton; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-02-25

6.  Peer presence increases the prosocial behavior of adolescents by speeding the evaluation of outcomes for others.

Authors:  Nicolette J Sullivan; Rosa Li; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The formation of preference in risky choice.

Authors:  Moshe Glickman; Orian Sharoni; Dino J Levy; Ernst Niebur; Veit Stuphorn; Marius Usher
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  GLAMbox: A Python toolbox for investigating the association between gaze allocation and decision behaviour.

Authors:  Felix Molter; Armin W Thomas; Hauke R Heekeren; Peter N C Mohr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.

Authors:  Frederick Callaway; Antonio Rangel; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A causal role for the right frontal eye fields in value comparison.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Andres Mitsumasu; Christian C Ruff; Ernst Fehr; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.