Literature DB >> 28646419

Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target.

Jennifer S Burt1, Jessica Jolley2.   

Abstract

University students named a 72-ms masked target word that was preceded by two 120-ms consecutively presented words, a prime word followed by a distractor. In Experiment 1, all words were in lowercase letters, whereas in Experiment 2, the target word was changed to uppercase letters. In both experiments there was an accuracy and latency cost (repetition blindness: RB) when the prime was the same word as the target, with the cost much less severe in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. A low-frequency distractor impaired target identification compared with a high-frequency distractor. Distractor frequency interacted with target frequency such that high-frequency targets preceded by low-frequency distractors had the lowest accuracy. The results are consistent with a frequency-dependent competition for access to working memory among briefly displayed words. However, there was no clear evidence that effects of target repetition on interword competition play a role in RB. The effects of a letter case change for the target are consistent with a contribution of token distinctiveness to word-order recovery in the intervening-word priming task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Lexical processing; Repetition priming

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28646419     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0726-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  False memory following rapidly presented lists: the element of surprise.

Authors:  Bruce W A Whittlesea; Michael E J Masson; Andrea D Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-04-26

2.  Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects.

Authors:  David E Huber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-05

3.  T1 difficulty affects the AB: manipulating T1 word frequency and T1 orthographic neighbor frequency.

Authors:  Jennifer S Burt; Samantha Howard; Emmaline K Falconer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items.

Authors:  C R Luo; A Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

6.  Repetition blindness between visually different items: the case of pictures and words.

Authors:  D Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-03

7.  Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item.

Authors:  C R Luo; A Caramazza
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-10

8.  Repetition blindness in rapid lists: activation and inhibition versus construction and attribution.

Authors:  Bruce W A Whittlesea; Michael E J Masson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Repetition blindness: the effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; M C Potter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03

10.  Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure.

Authors:  L Hochhaus; K M Marohn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.