Literature DB >> 15856285

False memory following rapidly presented lists: the element of surprise.

Bruce W A Whittlesea1, Michael E J Masson, Andrea D Hughes.   

Abstract

This article examines a false memory phenomenon, the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) effect, consisting of high false alarms for a prototype word (e.g., SLEEP) following a study list consisting of its associates (NIGHT, DREAM, etc.). This false recognition is thought to occur because prototypes, although not presented within a study list, are highly activated by their semantic association with words that are in the list. The authors present an alternative explanation of the effect, based on the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. According to that account, false (and true) familiarity results when a comparison between expectations and outcomes within a processing episode causes surprise. Experiment 1 replicates the DRM effect. Experiment 2 shows that a similar effect can occur when participants are shown lists of unrelated words and are then surprised by a recognition target. Experiments 3 and 4 show that the DRM effect itself is abolished when participants are prevented from being surprised by prototypes presented as recognition targets. It is proposed that the DRM effect is best understood through the principles of construction, evaluation, and attribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856285     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0213-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  27 in total

1.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  Long-term semantic transfer: an overlapping-operations account.

Authors:  Andrea D Hughes; Bruce W A Whittlesea
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

4.  Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not).

Authors:  Bruce W A Whittlesea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-09

5.  Priming effects that span an intervening unrelated word: implications for models of memory representation and retrieval.

Authors:  S Joordens; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.

Authors:  J D Read
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

7.  False recognition in younger and older adults: exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.

Authors:  K A Norman; D L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

8.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

9.  Long-term semantic priming: a computational account and empirical evidence.

Authors:  S Becker; M Moscovitch; M Behrmann; S Joordens
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  3 in total

1.  Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target.

Authors:  Jennifer S Burt; Jessica Jolley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

2.  Dreams, reality and memory: confabulations in lucid dreamers implicate reality-monitoring dysfunction in dream consciousness.

Authors:  P R Corlett; S V Canavan; L Nahum; F Appah; P T Morgan
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 1.871

3.  Illusions and delusions: relating experimentally-induced false memories to anomalous experiences and ideas.

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; Jon S Simons; Jennifer S Pigott; Jennifer M Gardner; Graham K Murray; John H Krystal; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.558

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.