Literature DB >> 28645845

The feature-weighted receptive field: an interpretable encoding model for complex feature spaces.

Ghislain St-Yves1, Thomas Naselaris2.   

Abstract

We introduce the feature-weighted receptive field (fwRF), an encoding model designed to balance expressiveness, interpretability and scalability. The fwRF is organized around the notion of a feature map-a transformation of visual stimuli into visual features that preserves the topology of visual space (but not necessarily the native resolution of the stimulus). The key assumption of the fwRF model is that activity in each voxel encodes variation in a spatially localized region across multiple feature maps. This region is fixed for all feature maps; however, the contribution of each feature map to voxel activity is weighted. Thus, the model has two separable sets of parameters: "where" parameters that characterize the location and extent of pooling over visual features, and "what" parameters that characterize tuning to visual features. The "where" parameters are analogous to classical receptive fields, while "what" parameters are analogous to classical tuning functions. By treating these as separable parameters, the fwRF model complexity is independent of the resolution of the underlying feature maps. This makes it possible to estimate models with thousands of high-resolution feature maps from relatively small amounts of data. Once a fwRF model has been estimated from data, spatial pooling and feature tuning can be read-off directly with no (or very little) additional post-processing or in-silico experimentation. We describe an optimization algorithm for estimating fwRF models from data acquired during standard visual neuroimaging experiments. We then demonstrate the model's application to two distinct sets of features: Gabor wavelets and features supplied by a deep convolutional neural network. We show that when Gabor feature maps are used, the fwRF model recovers receptive fields and spatial frequency tuning functions consistent with known organizational principles of the visual cortex. We also show that a fwRF model can be used to regress entire deep convolutional networks against brain activity. The ability to use whole networks in a single encoding model yields state-of-the-art prediction accuracy. Our results suggest a wide variety of uses for the feature-weighted receptive field model, from retinotopic mapping with natural scenes, to regressing the activities of whole deep neural networks onto measured brain activity.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep neural network; FMRI; Feature-weighted receptive field; Visual cortex; Voxel-wise encoding model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28645845      PMCID: PMC5886832          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Resolving Ambiguities of MVPA Using Explicit Models of Representation.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Kendrick N Kay
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Ventral Stream.

Authors:  Umut Güçlü; Marcel A J van Gerven
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Inverse retinotopy: inferring the visual content of images from brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Bertrand Thirion; Edouard Duchesnay; Edward Hubbard; Jessica Dubois; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Denis Lebihan; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Serge O Dumoulin; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Seeing it all: Convolutional network layers map the function of the human visual system.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Alexandre Gramfort; Gaël Varoquaux; Bertrand Thirion
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Bayesian reconstruction of natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Kendrick N Kay; Michael Oliver; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Natural scene statistics account for the representation of scene categories in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Dustin E Stansbury; Thomas Naselaris; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Deep Neural Networks: A New Framework for Modeling Biological Vision and Brain Information Processing.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.422

View more
  10 in total

1.  Transferring and generalizing deep-learning-based neural encoding models across subjects.

Authors:  Haiguang Wen; Junxing Shi; Wei Chen; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Studying Cortical Plasticity in Ophthalmic and Neurological Disorders: From Stimulus-Driven to Cortical Circuitry Modeling Approaches.

Authors:  Joana Carvalho; Remco J Renken; Frans W Cornelissen
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  End-to-end neural system identification with neural information flow.

Authors:  K Seeliger; L Ambrogioni; Y Güçlütürk; L M van den Bulk; U Güçlü; M A J van Gerven
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Divisive normalization unifies disparate response signatures throughout the human visual hierarchy.

Authors:  Marco Aqil; Tomas Knapen; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  fMRI Brain Decoding and Its Applications in Brain-Computer Interface: A Survey.

Authors:  Bing Du; Xiaomu Cheng; Yiping Duan; Huansheng Ning
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-07

6.  NeuroGen: Activation optimized image synthesis for discovery neuroscience.

Authors:  Zijin Gu; Keith Wakefield Jamison; Meenakshi Khosla; Emily J Allen; Yihan Wu; Ghislain St-Yves; Thomas Naselaris; Kendrick Kay; Mert R Sabuncu; Amy Kuceyeski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Self-supervised Natural Image Reconstruction and Large-scale Semantic Classification from Brain Activity.

Authors:  Guy Gaziv; Roman Beliy; Niv Granot; Assaf Hoogi; Francesca Strappini; Tal Golan; Michal Irani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 7.400

8.  High-Level Visual Encoding Model Framework with Hierarchical Ventral Stream-Optimized Neural Networks.

Authors:  Wulue Xiao; Jingwei Li; Chi Zhang; Linyuan Wang; Panpan Chen; Ziya Yu; Li Tong; Bin Yan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-19

9.  Network architectures supporting learnability.

Authors:  Perry Zurn; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Working memory representations in visual cortex mediate distraction effects.

Authors:  Grace E Hallenbeck; Thomas C Sprague; Masih Rahmati; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.