Literature DB >> 28645137

To take or not to take: the association between perceived addiction risk, expected analgesic response and likelihood of trying novel pain relievers in self-identified chronic pain patients.

D Andrew Tompkins1, Andrew S Huhn1, Patrick S Johnson2, Michael T Smith1, Eric C Strain1, Robert R Edwards3, Matthew W Johnson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Probability discounting refers to the effect of outcome uncertainty on decision making. Using probability discounting, we examined the degree to which self-identified chronic pain patients (CPP) were likely to try a novel analgesic medication given increasing addiction risk. We postulated that propensity for opioid misuse, trait impulsivity and previous opioid experience would be associated positively with likelihood of risky medication use.
DESIGN: This cross-sectional on-line study determined state/trait associations with addiction-related medication decisions in CPP.
SETTING: US-based CPP participated via Amazon Mechanical Turk; data were collected and analyzed in Baltimore, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 263 CPP (70.6% female) participated in the study from 12-13 December 2014. MEASUREMENTS: CPP responded to the Benefit versus Addiction Risk Questionnaire (BARQ) assessing likelihood of taking a hypothetical once-daily oral analgesic medication as a function of two factors: risk of addiction (0-50%) and duration of expected complete pain relief (3, 30 or 365 days). The primary outcome was the BARQ, quantified as area under the curve (AUC). Grouping of CPP at high or low risk for opioid misuse was based on the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R). Predictors included previous experience with opioids, as well as various measures of chronic pain and mental health.
FINDINGS: Across hypothetical addiction risk assessed in the BARQ, the likelihood of taking a novel analgesic medication was elevated significantly in patients with high (≥18; n = 137) versus low (<18; n = 126) SOAPP-R scores [P < 0.001; 3-day: Cohen's d = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.63, 0.69; 30-day: d = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.71, 0.78; 365-day: d = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.72, 0.79].
CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, self-identified chronic pain patients (CPP) at higher risk for opioid misuse were more likely to report willingness to try a novel analgesic despite increasing addiction risk than CPP with low risk of opioid misuse.
© 2017 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction; BARQ; SOAPP-R; analgesic medications; chronic pain; decision-making; probability discounting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28645137      PMCID: PMC5725253          DOI: 10.1111/add.13922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  43 in total

1.  Substance misuse treatment for high-risk chronic pain patients on opioid therapy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert N Jamison; Edgar L Ross; Edward Michna; Li Q Chen; Caroline Holcomb; Ajay D Wasan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Uwe Junker; Christin Juhnke; Edgar Stemmler; Thomas Kohlmann; Friedhelm Leverkus; Matthias Nübling
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-06-21

Review 3.  Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods.

Authors:  Shehzad Ali; Sarah Ronaldson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Using Mechanical Turk for research on cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joanna J Arch; Alaina L Carr
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Predicting aberrant drug behavior in patients treated for chronic pain: importance of abuse history.

Authors:  Edward Michna; Edgar L Ross; Wilfred L Hynes; Srdjan S Nedeljkovic; Sharonah Soumekh; David Janfaza; Diane Palombi; Robert N Jamison
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Validation of the revised Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP-R).

Authors:  Stephen F Butler; Kathrine Fernandez; Christine Benoit; Simon H Budman; Robert N Jamison
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Prevalence of chronic pain in a representative sample in the United States.

Authors:  Jochen Hardt; Clemma Jacobsen; Jack Goldberg; Ralf Nickel; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 8.  Opioid dependence and addiction during opioid treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  Jane C Ballantyne; Steven K LaForge
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Reported side effects, bother, satisfaction, and adherence in patients taking hydrocodone for non-cancer pain.

Authors:  Kathryn P Anastassopoulos; Wing Chow; Crisanta I Tapia; Rebecca Baik; Bruce Moskowitz; Myoung S Kim
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

10.  Alcohol Increases Delay and Probability Discounting of Condom-Protected Sex: A Novel Vector for Alcohol-Related HIV Transmission.

Authors:  Patrick S Johnson; Mary M Sweeney; Evan S Herrmann; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  5 in total

1.  Individuals with Chronic Pain Who Misuse Prescription Opioids Report Sex-Based Differences in Pain and Opioid Withdrawal.

Authors:  Andrew S Huhn; D Andrew Tompkins; Claudia M Campbell; Kelly E Dunn
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.

Authors:  Alexandra M Mellis; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Predictors of Pain Reliever Misuse Among Respondents of the United States 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

Authors:  Marissa S Matta; Timothy P Janikowski
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2022-07-12

4.  The drug purity discounting task: Ecstasy use likelihood is reduced by probabilistic impurity according to harmfulness of adulterants.

Authors:  Sean B Dolan; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  The discounting of death: Probability discounting of heroin use by fatal overdose likelihood and drug purity.

Authors:  Sean B Dolan; Matthew W Johnson; Kelly E Dunn; Andrew S Huhn
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.