Literature DB >> 27283906

Using Mechanical Turk for research on cancer survivors.

Joanna J Arch1, Alaina L Carr1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The successful recruitment and study of cancer survivors within psycho-oncology research can be challenging, time-consuming, and expensive, particularly for key subgroups such as young adult cancer survivors. Online crowdsourcing platforms offer a potential solution that has not yet been investigated with regard to cancer populations. The current study assessed the presence of cancer survivors on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and the feasibility of using MTurk as an efficient, cost-effective, and reliable psycho-oncology recruitment and research platform.
METHODS: During a <4-month period, cancer survivors living in the United States were recruited on MTurk to complete two assessments, spaced 1 week apart, relating to psychosocial and cancer-related functioning. The reliability and validity of responses were investigated.
RESULTS: Within a <4-month period, 464 self-identified cancer survivors on MTurk consented to and completed an online assessment. The vast majority (79.09%) provided reliable and valid study data according to multiple indices. The sample was highly diverse in terms of U.S. geography, socioeconomic status, and cancer type, and reflected a particularly strong presence of distressed and young adult cancer survivors (median age = 36 years). A majority of participants (58.19%) responded to a second survey sent one week later.
CONCLUSIONS: Online crowdsourcing represents a feasible, efficient, and cost-effective recruitment and research platform for cancer survivors, particularly for young adult cancer survivors and those with significant distress. We discuss remaining challenges and future recommendations.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet research; Mechanical Turk; cancer; crowdsourcing; oncology; recruitment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27283906     DOI: 10.1002/pon.4173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  9 in total

1.  Cancer treatment experiences among survivors of childhood sexual abuse: A qualitative investigation of triggers and reactions to cumulative trauma.

Authors:  Julie B Schnur; Matthew J Dillon; Rachel E Goldsmith; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2017-08-15

2.  Cancer Victim Identity for Individuals with Histories of Cancer and Childhood Sexual Abuse.

Authors:  Glynnis A McDonnell; Madalina Sucala; Rachel E Goldsmith; Guy H Montgomery; Julie B Schnur
Journal:  J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther       Date:  2017-03-04

Review 3.  Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.

Authors:  Karoline Mortensen; Taylor L Hughes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  To take or not to take: the association between perceived addiction risk, expected analgesic response and likelihood of trying novel pain relievers in self-identified chronic pain patients.

Authors:  D Andrew Tompkins; Andrew S Huhn; Patrick S Johnson; Michael T Smith; Eric C Strain; Robert R Edwards; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Leveraging crowdsourcing methods to collect qualitative data in addiction science: Narratives of non-medical prescription opioid, heroin, and fentanyl use.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Grant A Victor
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-11-18

6.  People Prefer to Continue with Painful Activities Even if They Lead to Earlier Surgery.

Authors:  Mahsa Mohammadian Amiri; David Ring; Amirreza Fatehi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.?

Authors:  Kelly Walters; Dimitri A Christakis; Davene R Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map.

Authors:  Geoff K Frampton; Jonathan Shepherd; Karen Pickett; Gareth Griffiths; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  A Tale of Two Diverse Qualtrics Samples: Information for Online Survey Researchers.

Authors:  Carrie A Miller; Jeanine P D Guidry; Bassam Dahman; Maria D Thomson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.