Literature DB >> 28643860

Subcutaneous defibrillators for dialysis patients.

Tushar J Vachharajani1, Loay Salman2, Eric J Costanzo3, Sushil K Mehandru3, Mayurkumar Patel3, Dawn M Calderon3, Roy O Mathew4, Mandeep S Sidhu2, Arif Asif3.   

Abstract

Defibrillation can be successfully provided by the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) without the leads. In contrast, traditional ICDs require leads that can cause central venous stenosis, lead-induced endocarditis, and carry the risk of tricuspid regurgitation by valve adhesion, perforation, coaptation interference, or entanglement. Central venous stenosis, infection, and tricuspid regurgitation are all critically important considerations in hemodialysis patients. Recent reports are supporting the use of subcutaneous ICDs in renal patients maintained on long-term hemodialysis. This article provides the risks associated with leads of traditional defibrillators and raises awareness of the subcutaneous ICD and their benefits for hemodialysis patients.
© 2017 International Society for Hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Subcutaneous defibrillator; dialysis catheter; hemodialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28643860     DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  2 in total

Review 1.  Comparing the safety of subcutaneous versus transvenous ICDs: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Su; Jia Guo; Yingqun Hao; Hong Tan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Device Placement: Results of a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Mohammad A Hossain; Firas Ajam; Hetavi Mahida; Anas Alrefaee; Swapnil Patel; Khushboo Agarwal; Marjan Alidoost; Shereen Dahab; Amy Quinlan; Michael Orange; Arman Mushtaq; Arif Asif
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2020-03-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.