| Literature DB >> 28643770 |
Yanwu Zhang1, Yidong Lv1, Yaodong Niu1, Hongge Su1, Aiqiang Feng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor in females. This study investigated the role and utility of CTC monitoring in evaluating the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 286 female triple-negative breast cancer patients who were diagnosed at and received radical resection surgery in our hospital. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected preoperatively and at 3 and 7 days postoperative, and the Cell Search system was used to detect CTC in peripheral blood. We analyzed the relationship between preoperative CTC level and clinical pathological characteristics of patients. Kaplan-Meier method was used to establish progression-free survival curves and overall survival curves, we used the log-rank test to compare the survival rate, and we explored the effects of preoperative and postoperative CTC levels on patient survival. RESULTS Compared with preoperative levels, the average CTC content in peripheral blood of breast cancer patients was significantly increased at 3 days after surgery, and then decreased to the preoperative baseline level by 7 days after surgery. The 3-year overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate in patients with CTC >5/7.5 mL peripheral blood were significantly lower than in patients with CTC <5/7.5 mL peripheral blood detected preoperatively and at 3 and 7 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Dynamic monitoring of preoperative and postoperative CTC levels can accurately predict recurrence and progression of disease, and is important in postoperative monitoring and prognosis evaluation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28643770 PMCID: PMC5493060 DOI: 10.12659/msm.902637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Clinical pathological characteristics and CTC baseline data of TNBC patients.
| Clinical characteristics | Number of cases | CTC detection | χ2 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of positive cases | Positive rate (%) | ||||
| Age | 0.645 | 0.422 | |||
| ≤50 years old | 120 | 40 | 33.3 | ||
| >50 years old | 166 | 63 | 37.9 | ||
| Menstrual status | 1.933 | 0.164 | |||
| Premenopause | 121 | 38 | 31.4 | ||
| Postmenopause | 165 | 65 | 39.4 | ||
| Tumor size | 4.069 | 0.131 | |||
| <2 cm | 136 | 42 | 30.9 | ||
| 2~5 cm | 110 | 42 | 38.2 | ||
| >5 cm | 40 | 19 | 47.5 | ||
| Tumor type | 0.595 | 0.743 | |||
| Ductal carcinoma | 169 | 59 | 34.9 | ||
| Lobular carcinoma | 68 | 24 | 35.3 | ||
| Lobular/ductal carcinoma | 49 | 20 | 40.8 | ||
| Histological pathological grading | 0.286 | 0.867 | |||
| I | 142 | 49 | 34.5 | ||
| II | 74 | 28 | 37.8 | ||
| III | 70 | 26 | 37.1 | ||
| TNM staging | 23.097 | 0.001 | |||
| I | 129 | 30 | 23.3 | ||
| II | 81 | 30 | 37.0 | ||
| III | 76 | 43 | 56.6 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 5.818 | 0.016 | |||
| Without | 98 | 26 | 26.5 | ||
| With | 188 | 77 | 40.9 | ||
Variation of CTC level before and after operation.
| Variation of CTC value | 3 days after operation | 7 days after operation | χ2 | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | Percentage (%) | Number of cases | Percentage (%) | |||
| Reduced | 58 | 20.3 | 80 | 27.9 | 9.977 | 0.007 |
| No change | 103 | 36.0 | 116 | 40.6 | ||
| Increased | 125 | 43.7 | 90 | 31.5 | ||
Effect of CTC level on the therapeutic effect of patients.
| CTC | Before operation | 3 days after operation | 7 days after operation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤5 (224) | >5 (62) | ≤5 (205) | >5 (81) | ≤5 (219) | >5 (67) | |
| ORR (%) | 161 (71.88%) | 34 (54.84%) | 145 (71.22%) | 49 (60.49%) | 167 (76.25%) | 27 (40.30%) |
| DCR (%) | 182 (81.25%) | 39 (62.90%) | 162 (79.02%) | 59 (72.83%) | 189 (86.30%) | 32 (47.76%) |
| Recurrence rate (%) | 21 (9.38%) | 9 (14.52%) | 18 (8.78%) | 12 (14.81%) | 15 (6.85%) | 15 (22.39%) |
Indicates that compared with CTC ≤5, P<0.05.
Figure 1Analysis of survival curves of patients with different CTC levels. (A) Preoperative OS rate compared in patients with different CTC levels; (B) Preoperative PFS rate compared in patients with different CTC levels; (C) OS rate 3 days after operation compared in patients with different CTC levels; (D) PFS rate 3 days after operation compared in patients with different CTC levels. (E) 7 days after operation OS rate comparison in patients with different CTC levels. (F) PFS rate 7 days after operation compared in patients with different CTC levels.