Daniel L Hertz1,2, Kelly A Speth3, Kelley M Kidwell4,3, Christina L Gersch4,5, Zeruesenay Desta6, Anna Maria Storniolo6, Vered Stearns7, Todd C Skaar6, Daniel F Hayes4,5, N Lynn Henry4,5,8, James M Rae4,5. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 428 Church St. Room 3054, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1065, USA. dlhertz@med.umich.edu. 2. Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, USA. dlhertz@med.umich.edu. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA. 4. Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, USA. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA. 6. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. 7. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. 8. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aromatase inhibitors (AI) exemestane (EXE), letrozole (LET), and anastrozole suppress estrogen biosynthesis, and are effective treatments for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Prior work suggests that anastrozole blood concentrations are associated with the magnitude of estrogen suppression. The objective of this study was to determine whether the magnitude of estrogen suppression, as determined by plasma estradiol (E2) concentrations, in EXE or LET treated patients is associated with plasma AI concentrations. METHODS:Five hundred post-menopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer were enrolled in the prospective Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenetic (ELPh) Study conducted by the COnsortium on BReast cancer phArmacogomics (COBRA) and randomly assigned to either drug. Estrogen concentrations were measured at baseline and after 3 months of AI treatment and drug concentrations were measured after 1 or 3 months. EXE or LET concentrations were compared with 3-month E2 concentration or the change from baseline to 3 months using several complementary statistical procedures. RESULTS:Four-hundred patients with on-treatment E2 andAI concentrations were evaluable (EXE n = 200, LET n = 200). Thirty (7.6%) patients (EXE n = 13, LET n = 17) had 3-month E2 concentrations above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (median: 4.75; range: 1.42-63.8 pg/mL). EXE and LET concentrations were not associated with on-treatment E2 concentrations or changes in E2 concentrations from baseline (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state plasma AI concentrations do not explain variability in E2 suppression in post-menopausal women receiving EXE or LET therapy, in contrast with prior evidence in anastrozole treated patients.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aromatase inhibitors (AI) exemestane (EXE), letrozole (LET), and anastrozole suppress estrogen biosynthesis, and are effective treatments for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Prior work suggests that anastrozole blood concentrations are associated with the magnitude of estrogen suppression. The objective of this study was to determine whether the magnitude of estrogen suppression, as determined by plasma estradiol (E2) concentrations, in EXE or LET treated patients is associated with plasma AI concentrations. METHODS: Five hundred post-menopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer were enrolled in the prospective Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenetic (ELPh) Study conducted by the COnsortium on BReast cancer phArmacogomics (COBRA) and randomly assigned to either drug. Estrogen concentrations were measured at baseline and after 3 months of AI treatment and drug concentrations were measured after 1 or 3 months. EXE or LET concentrations were compared with 3-month E2 concentration or the change from baseline to 3 months using several complementary statistical procedures. RESULTS: Four-hundred patients with on-treatment E2 and AI concentrations were evaluable (EXE n = 200, LET n = 200). Thirty (7.6%) patients (EXE n = 13, LET n = 17) had 3-month E2 concentrations above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (median: 4.75; range: 1.42-63.8 pg/mL). EXE and LET concentrations were not associated with on-treatment E2 concentrations or changes in E2 concentrations from baseline (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state plasma AI concentrations do not explain variability in E2 suppression in post-menopausal women receiving EXE or LET therapy, in contrast with prior evidence in anastrozole treated patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aromatase inhibitor; Breast cancer; Estradiol; Exemestane; Letrozole; Pharmacokinetics
Authors: James N Ingle; Aman U Buzdar; Daniel J Schaid; Matthew P Goetz; Anthony Batzler; Mark E Robson; Donald W Northfelt; Janet E Olson; Edith A Perez; Zeruesenay Desta; Randy A Weintraub; Clark V Williard; David A Flockhart; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ian E Smith; Mitch Dowsett; Yoon-Sim Yap; Geraldine Walsh; Per E Lønning; Richard J Santen; Daniel Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jürgen Geisler; Hilgegunn Helle; Dagfinn Ekse; Nhat K Duong; Dean B Evans; Yngve Nordbø; Turid Aas; Per E Lønning Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Richard J Santen; Lawrence Demers; Susan Ohorodnik; J Settlage; Peter Langecker; D Blanchett; Paul E Goss; Shuping Wang Journal: Steroids Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Anneleen Lintermans; Dirk Vanderschueren; Johan Verhaeghe; Kathleen Van Asten; Ivo Jans; Erik Van Herck; Annouschka Laenen; Robert Paridaens; Jaak Billen; Steven Pauwels; Pieter Vermeersch; Hans Wildiers; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Patrick Neven Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Meredith M Regan; Prudence A Francis; Olivia Pagani; Gini F Fleming; Barbara A Walley; Giuseppe Viale; Marco Colleoni; István Láng; Henry L Gómez; Carlo Tondini; Graziella Pinotti; Karen N Price; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Richard D Gelber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kunal C Kadakia; Claire F Snyder; Kelley M Kidwell; Nicholas J Seewald; David A Flockhart; Todd C Skaar; Zereunesay Desta; James M Rae; Julie L Otte; Janet S Carpenter; Anna M Storniolo; Daniel F Hayes; Vered Stearns; N Lynn Henry Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-03-23
Authors: Jacqueline M Dempsey; Kelley M Kidwell; Christina L Gersch; Andrea M Pesch; Zeruesenay Desta; Anna Maria Storniolo; Vered Stearns; Todd C Skaar; Daniel F Hayes; N Lynn Henry; James M Rae; Daniel L Hertz Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Keneuoe Cecilia Nthontho; Andrew Khulekani Ndlovu; Kirthana Sharma; Ishmael Kasvosve; Daniel Louis Hertz; Giacomo Maria Paganotti Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med Date: 2022-06-21
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Julie A Douglas; Kelley M Kidwell; Christina L Gersch; Zeruesenay Desta; Ana-Maria Storniolo; Vered Stearns; Todd C Skaar; Daniel F Hayes; N Lynn Henry; James M Rae Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 2.000