Daniel L Hertz1, Julie A Douglas2,3, Kelley M Kidwell4, Christina L Gersch5, Zeruesenay Desta6, Ana-Maria Storniolo6, Vered Stearns7, Todd C Skaar6, Daniel F Hayes5, N Lynn Henry5, James M Rae5. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 7. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Letrozole is a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Variability in letrozole efficacy and toxicity may be partially attributable to variable systemic drug exposure, which may be influenced by germline variants in the enzymes responsible for letrozole metabolism, including cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6). The objective of this genome-wide association study (GWAS) was to identify polymorphisms associated with steady-state letrozole concentrations. METHODS: The Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenetics (ELPh) Study randomized postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer to letrozole or exemestane treatment. Germline DNA was collected pretreatment and blood samples were collected after 1 or 3 months of treatment to measure steady-state letrozole (and exemestane) plasma concentrations via HPLC/MS. Genome-wide genotyping was conducted on the Infinium Global Screening Array (>650 000 variants) followed by imputation. The association of each germline variant with age- and BMI-adjusted letrozole concentrations was tested in self-reported white patients via linear regression assuming an additive genetic model. RESULTS: There were 228 patients who met the study-specific inclusion criteria and had both DNA and letrozole concentration data for this GWAS. The association for one genotyped polymorphism (rs7937) with letrozole concentration surpassed genome-wide significance (P = 5.26 × 10-10), explaining 13% of the variability in untransformed steady-state letrozole concentrations. Imputation around rs7937 and in silico analyses identified rs56113850, a variant in the CYP2A6 intron that may affect CYP2A6 expression and activity. rs7937 was associated with age- and BMI-adjusted letrozole levels even after adjusting for genotype-predicted CYP2A6 metabolic phenotype (P = 3.86 × 10-10). CONCLUSION: Our GWAS findings confirm that steady-state letrozole plasma concentrations are partially determined by germline polymorphisms that affect CYP2A6 activity, including variants near rs7937 such as the intronic rs56113850 variant. Further research is needed to confirm whether rs56113850 directly affects CYP2A6 activity and to integrate nonexonic variants into CYP2A6 phenotypic activity prediction systems.
OBJECTIVES: Letrozole is a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Variability in letrozole efficacy and toxicity may be partially attributable to variable systemic drug exposure, which may be influenced by germline variants in the enzymes responsible for letrozole metabolism, including cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6). The objective of this genome-wide association study (GWAS) was to identify polymorphisms associated with steady-state letrozole concentrations. METHODS: The Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenetics (ELPh) Study randomized postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer to letrozole or exemestane treatment. Germline DNA was collected pretreatment and blood samples were collected after 1 or 3 months of treatment to measure steady-state letrozole (and exemestane) plasma concentrations via HPLC/MS. Genome-wide genotyping was conducted on the Infinium Global Screening Array (>650 000 variants) followed by imputation. The association of each germline variant with age- and BMI-adjusted letrozole concentrations was tested in self-reported white patients via linear regression assuming an additive genetic model. RESULTS: There were 228 patients who met the study-specific inclusion criteria and had both DNA and letrozole concentration data for this GWAS. The association for one genotyped polymorphism (rs7937) with letrozole concentration surpassed genome-wide significance (P = 5.26 × 10-10), explaining 13% of the variability in untransformed steady-state letrozole concentrations. Imputation around rs7937 and in silico analyses identified rs56113850, a variant in the CYP2A6 intron that may affect CYP2A6 expression and activity. rs7937 was associated with age- and BMI-adjusted letrozole levels even after adjusting for genotype-predicted CYP2A6 metabolic phenotype (P = 3.86 × 10-10). CONCLUSION: Our GWAS findings confirm that steady-state letrozole plasma concentrations are partially determined by germline polymorphisms that affect CYP2A6 activity, including variants near rs7937 such as the intronic rs56113850 variant. Further research is needed to confirm whether rs56113850 directly affects CYP2A6 activity and to integrate nonexonic variants into CYP2A6 phenotypic activity prediction systems.
Authors: N Lynn Henry; Jon A Jacobson; Mousumi Banerjee; Jill Hayden; Jeffrey B Smerage; Catherine Van Poznak; Anna Maria Storniolo; Vered Stearns; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Alison A Motsinger-Reif; Eric Jorgenson; Mary V Relling; Deanna L Kroetz; Richard Weinshilboum; Nancy J Cox; Dan M Roden Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; Silvana Martino; Nicholas J Robert; Hyman B Muss; Martine J Piccart; Monica Castiglione; Dongsheng Tu; Lois E Shepherd; Kathleen I Pritchard; Robert B Livingston; Nancy E Davidson; Larry Norton; Edith A Perez; Jeffrey S Abrams; Patrick Therasse; Michael J Palmer; Joseph L Pater Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James N Ingle; Krishna R Kalari; Aman U Buzdar; Mark E Robson; Matthew P Goetz; Zeruesenay Desta; Poulami Barman; Tanda T Dudenkov; Donald W Northfelt; Edith A Perez; David A Flockhart; Clark V Williard; Liewei Wang; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Steroids Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Maria N Timofeeva; James D McKay; George Davey Smith; Mattias Johansson; Graham B Byrnes; Amélie Chabrier; Caroline Relton; Per Magne Ueland; Stein Emil Vollset; Øivind Midttun; Ottar Nygård; Nadia Slimani; Isabelle Romieu; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Guy Fagherazzi; Rudolf Kaaks; Birgit Teucher; Heiner Boeing; Cornelia Weikert; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Carla van Gils; Petra H M Peeters; Antonio Agudo; Aurelio Barricarte; Jose-Maria Huerta; Laudina Rodríguez; Maria-José Sánchez; Nerea Larrañaga; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nick Wareham; Naomi E Allen; Ruth C Travis; Valentina Gallo; Teresa Norat; Vittorio Krogh; Giovanna Masala; Salvatore Panico; Carlotta Sacerdote; Rosario Tumino; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Torgny Rasmuson; Göran Hallmans; Elio Riboli; Paolo Vineis; Paul Brennan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-08-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sharon M Lutz; Michael H Cho; Kendra Young; Craig P Hersh; Peter J Castaldi; Merry-Lynn McDonald; Elizabeth Regan; Manuel Mattheisen; Dawn L DeMeo; Margaret Parker; Marilyn Foreman; Barry J Make; Robert L Jensen; Richard Casaburi; David A Lomas; Surya P Bhatt; Per Bakke; Amund Gulsvik; James D Crapo; Terri H Beaty; Nan M Laird; Christoph Lange; John E Hokanson; Edwin K Silverman Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 2.797
Authors: James W Baurley; Christopher K Edlund; Carissa I Pardamean; David V Conti; Ruth Krasnow; Harold S Javitz; Hyman Hops; Gary E Swan; Neal L Benowitz; Andrew W Bergen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Julie A Douglas; Robert M Miller; Kelley M Kidwell; Christina L Gersch; Zeruesenay Desta; Anna Maria Storniolo; Vered Stearns; Todd C Skaar; Daniel F Hayes; N Lynn Henry; James M Rae Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Keneuoe Cecilia Nthontho; Andrew Khulekani Ndlovu; Kirthana Sharma; Ishmael Kasvosve; Daniel Louis Hertz; Giacomo Maria Paganotti Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med Date: 2022-06-21