Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Augments Arsenic Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by Strengthening Antioxidant Defense System and Thiol Metabolism.

Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) can help plants to tolerate arsenic (As) toxicity. However, plant responses are found to vary with the host plant and the AM fungal species. The present study compares the efficacy of two AM fungi Rhizoglomus intraradices (M1) and Glomus etunicatum (M2) in amelioration of As stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. HD-2967). Mycorrhizal (M) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) wheat plants were subjected to four levels of As (0, 25, 50, and 100 mg As kg-1 soil). Although As additions had variable effects on the percentage of root colonized by the two fungal inoculants, each mycobiont conferred benefits to the host plant. Mycorrhizal plants continued to display better growth than NM plants. Formation of AM helped the host plant to overcome As-induced P deficiency and maintained favorable P:As ratio. Inoculation of AMF had variable effects on the distribution of As in plant tissues. While As translocation factor decreased in low As (25 mg kg-1 soil), it increased under high As (50 and 100 mg As kg-1 soil). Further As translocation to grain was reduced (As grain:shoot ratio) in M plants compared with NM plants. Arsenic-induced oxidative stress (generation of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation) in plants reduced significantly by AMF inoculation. The alleviation potential of AM was more evident with increase in severity of As stress. Colonization of AMF resulted in higher activities of the antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and guaiacol peroxidase). It increased the concentrations of the antioxidant molecules (carotenoids, proline, and α-tocopherol) than their NM counterparts at high As addition level. Comparatively higher activities of enzymes of glutathione-ascorbate cycle in M plants led to higher ascorbate:dehydroascorbate (AsA:DHA) and glutathione:glutathione disulphide (GSH:GSSG) ratios. Inoculation by AMF also augmented the glyoxalase system by increasing the activities of both glyoxalase I and glyoxalase II enzymes. Mycorrhizal colonization increased concentrations of cysteine, glutathione, non-protein thiols, and activity of glutathione-S-transferase that facilitated sequestration of As into non-toxic complexes. The study reveals multifarious role of AMF in alleviation of As toxicity.

Introduction

Increase in geological and anthropogenic activities across the globe have led to heavy metal contamination in groundwater and soil. Heavy metals like As, cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), and mercury (Hg) have been reported to be the major heavy metal pollutants of groundwater and soil (Chatterjee and Chatterjee, 2000; Öncel et al., 2000; Oancea et al., 2005). This has steered changes in physiological and biochemical processes in plants leading to a reduction in plant growth, performance and yield. Toxic effects of these heavy metals include inhibition of cytoplasmic enzymes and damage to cell structures due to oxidative stress (Van Assche and Clijsters, 1990; Asati et al., 2016). Groundwater contaminations with As have been reported in many countries such as Argentina, Bangladesh, Chile, China, India, Japan, Mexico, Mongolia, Nepal, Poland, Taiwan, Vietnam, and United States (Chowdhury et al., 2000; Smith et al., 2000; Anawar et al., 2002; Pandey et al., 2002). However, in the Ganges Delta region of Bangladesh and West Bengal, As in groundwater has emerged as the largest environmental health disaster (Rahman et al., 2009). Much of South Asia’s food grains supply particularly staple foods like wheat and rice comes from Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP). Rice and wheat are the staple food crops occupying nearly 13.5 million hectares of the IGP of South Asia covering Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Nepal. These crops contribute more than 80% of the total cereal production and are critically important to employment and food security for hundreds of millions of rural families for these countries (Gupta and Seth, 2007; Sekar and Pal, 2012). As-contaminated groundwater is used for drinking as well as irrigation. There are concerns that As is absorbed by plants particularly cereals, that are irrigated with As-contaminated groundwater, and poses a great threat to human health and ecological safety (Zhu et al., 2008; Meharg et al., 2009).

The effect of the As-contaminated groundwater irrigation on crops has attracted attention only during the last decade (Norra et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2006; Bhattacharya et al., 2010). Most studies in the past have focused on rice, and relatively less information is available on As accumulation, distribution, and speciation in wheat, which is the second most important food grain cereal (Roychowdhury et al., 2002; Tao et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2010; Tong et al., 2014).

Arsenic enters in the plants through phosphate transporters as a phosphate analog or through aquaglyceroporins (Sharma, 2012). The phytotoxic effects of As generally include reduction in growth, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and nutrient uptake (Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2012). Arsenate [As(V)] is the main As species occurring in aerobic soils. It acts as a phosphate (Pi) analog and is transported across the plasma membrane via phosphate transport systems (Stoeva and Bineva, 2003). Cytoplasmic As(V) interferes with metabolic processes involving Pi, making it potentially toxic to plants. However, it is rapidly reduced to arsenite (AsIII) in the cytoplasm (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002; Stoeva and Bineva, 2003). Arsenate reduction results in the formation of ROS with consequent lipid peroxidation, and cellular damage (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002; Sharma, 2012). Arsenite reacts with sulfhydryl groups (-SH) of enzymes and tissue proteins, inhibiting cellular function, causing death (Smith et al., 2010a). ROS produced as a result of As stress need to be scavenged for maintenance of normal plant growth. Detoxification mechanisms for As(III) include efflux from the roots, sequestration in cell vacuoles and complexation with thiols for which As(III) has very high-affinity (Smith et al., 2010a).

Earlier investigations have shown that higher plants that are adapted to As-polluted soils are generally associated with AM fungi (Meharg and Cairney, 1999; Gonzalez-Chavez et al., 2002). The mechanisms by which AM fungi augment plant tolerance to As stress are not clear. Potential mechanisms that have been frequently recognized are improved nutritional status and reduced metal uptake. Inoculation by AM fungi can exert protective effects on vascular plants under As contamination by transforming inorganic As in less toxic organic forms or by diluting As concentration by enhancing plant biomass (Gonzalez-Chavez et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Dong et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016).

Formation of AM provides an alternative pathway — AM pathway for uptake of nutrients especially P. The AM pathway is distinct from the direct pathway; it involves different cell types, different Pi transporters, and is likely to be separately regulated (Smith and Smith, 2011). The direct pathway involves high-affinity Pi transporters located in root hairs and epidermal cells near the root apex. However, the mycorrhizal pathway develops behind the root hair zone. It involves uptake of Pi by AM fungal high-affinity Pi transporters in the extraradical mycelium, followed by translocation of phosphorus along the hyphae to intracellular structures in the root cortex and transfer to the root. The transfer across the symbiotic interface involves efflux of Pi from the AM fungus into the apoplast and uptake into the plant cells by Pi transporter(s) that are preferentially or specifically expressed in colonized cortical cells. Mycorrhizal plants display lower specific As(V) uptake and higher P:As ratio than NM plants (Christophersen et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2010b).

The AM symbiosis is known to increase tolerance of plants to various abiotic stresses by promoting antioxidant defense system (Ruiz-Lozano, 2003; Wu et al., 2006; Evelin and Kapoor, 2014). However, information on antioxidant defense in mycorrhizal (M) versus non-mycorrhizal (NM) plants in relation to As stress is very scarce (Yu et al., 2009; Garg and Singla, 2012; Garg et al., 2015). Plants subjected to abiotic stress often produce toxic aldehydes such as methylglyoxal (MG). MG is mostly detoxified by the combined actions of the enzymes Gly I and Gly II that together with glutathione make up the glyoxalase system (Hoque et al., 2016). Several studies have shown close links between the antioxidant and glyoxalase systems in plants, suggesting a direct influence of the glyoxalase system on ROS detoxification (reviewed in Hoque et al., 2016). However, effect of AMF inoculation on glyoxalase system in relation to abiotic stress tolerance has not been reported so far.

Among the various detoxification pathways activated in the plants under As stress, increased synthesis of sulfur-containing defense compounds such as PCs and GSH is considered to be of prime importance for the tolerance and survival of plants (Mishra et al., 2009). Role of AM in modulating thiol metabolism in relation to heavy metal stress such as Cd and Zn has been recently realized (Garg and Kaur, 2013; Garg and Chandel, 2015). However, to the best of our knowledge there is no report on the effect of AM on thiol metabolism in plants under As-stress.

This study was aimed to compare the effectiveness of two AM fungal species (Rhizoglomus intraradices and Glomus etunicatum) on growth and tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. HD-2967) in different levels of As stress. We tested the hypotheses that (1) inoculation with AM fungi results in decreased As uptake and its translocation to shoot and grain; and (2) AM formation results in mitigation of As-induced oxidative stress. We also measured the concentration of molecules containing -SH groups (such as cysteine, glutathione, and NPSHs) to gain insights into broader aspects of AM mediated As-stress alleviation.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

The crop plant chosen for the study is T. aestivum L. variety HD-2967. It is a double dwarf variety that was released for commercial cultivation in India in September 2011. It has profuse tillering and is resistant to Ug99, a deadly African race of stem rust already prevalent in central India. In the 2013–2014 Rabi (winter) season, it was grown in about six million hectares in India. The variety is resistant to salt stress, however, no information is available on tolerance to heavy metal stress including As.

AMF Symbionts

Inocula for the AM fungal symbionts R. intraradices (N.C. Schenck and G.S. Sm.) C. Walker and A. Schüßler (CMCCWep319) and G. etunicatum W.N. Becker and Gerd (CMCC/AM-1207) were obtained from Center for Mycorrhiza Culture Collection, The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, India. These were propagated as soil-based open cultures in sterile soil mixture (Kapoor et al., 2002). The cultures were maintained under natural conditions of temperature, light, and humidity for 1 year. No Rhizobium was added. NM mock inoculum consisted of trap plants without AMF inoculum grown under similar conditions. Before use, root colonization was confirmed and trap plants were allowed to dry. The inoculum consisted of the roots chopped into small pieces and mixed with the soil mass (containing about 150 spores per 10 g of soil and hyphae) of the culture pots.

Soil and Arsenic Treatment

Physico-chemical properties of the soil used in this experiment were analyzed at Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. The soil texture was sandy clay loam (48:29:23), pH 8.3 with high organic carbon concentration (1.0%), available phosphorus (116 kg ha-1) and potassium (432 kg ha-1) content. The soil used contained low nitrogen content (167 kg ha-1) but was adequate in micronutrients such as magnesium (97.3 mg kg-1), zinc (6.6 mg kg-1), and iron (9.4 mg kg-1). As content (14.8 μg kg-1) was also found in the soil. The soil had 11.5% moisture and 42.5% water holding capacity. Soil was mixed with sand in equal proportion. This soil mix will be referred to as soil henceforth. The soil was sterilized by autoclaving twice over 48 h at 121°C for 1 h, and 3 kg of sterilized soil was dispensed into each pot.

Different concentrations of As (0, 25, 50, and 100 mg As kg-1 soil) were prepared using sodium arsenate (Na2HAsO4.7H2O). These concentrations were chosen to study effectiveness of AM in low (25 mg As kg-1), moderate (50 mg As kg-1), and high (100 mg As kg-1) levels of As stress. Conclusion on these cardinal concentrations were based on studies on different crop plants (Chen et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2012; Spagnoletti and Lavado, 2015). In order to ensure homogenous distribution, As was dissolved in 50 ml of distilled water and then mixed thoroughly with soil. The pots were allowed to equilibrate for a period of 1 month by undergoing repeated cycles of saturation with distilled water and air drying (Cox and Kovar, 2001).

Experimental Design

The experiment had a completely randomized factorial design with two factors: AMF inoculations and As levels. There were four levels of As (0, 25, 50, and 100 mg As kg-1, soil) as Na2HAsO4.7H2O and three AMF treatments [Control (NM), R. intraradices, and G. etunicatum] (Supplementary Figure ). Hence, there were 12 treatments (4 × 3) and each treatment was replicated five times.

Wheat seeds were sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 15 min, and washed thoroughly with distilled water. The seeds were placed and allowed to germinate in wet sterilized germination paper for the period of 7 days at 25°C. Four seedlings (two-leaf stage) were transplanted in each pot. At the time of transplantation each seedling was inoculated by 20 g of AMF inoculum. NM plants were raised instead by adding dry mock inoculum.

The experiment was conducted in pots placed in the Botanical Garden of Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. Plants were grown for 45 days under natural conditions from December to February (Rabi season in India). During the experimental period, the average temperature ranged between 9 and 16°C and average relative humidity between 56 and 94%. Pots were casually rearranged after every 2 days during the growth period to take into account variations in environmental conditions (if any). The soil was maintained at 60% of field capacity, to avoid loss of solution due to drainage.

Plant Harvest

Shoots and roots were harvested separately. Samples were carefully washed with deionized water to remove adhering soil particles. The dry weights of shoot and root were determined after oven drying at 70°C for 48 h. Wheat spikes were collected and dried at 70°C to constant weight. The spikes were then dehusked by hand and the weight of thousand grains was recorded.

Percent Root Colonization by AMF

Subsamples of fresh roots were collected and cut into segments approximately 1 cm long, cleared with 10% (w/v) potassium hydroxide in a water bath at 90°C for 15 min, and stained with Trypan blue (Phillips and Hayman, 1970). The percentage of the total root colonized by the AM fungus was determined using the gridline intersect technique (Giovannetti and Mosse, 1980).

Determination of As and P Concentrations

Roots, shoots, and grains were analyzed for concentration of As and P. Oven-dried plant tissue samples were powdered to pass through a 0.5-mm sieve. Samples were digested with nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide in kjeldahl tubes. After digestion the solutions were cooled, diluted to 50 ml using double distilled water, filtered into acid-washed plastic bottles. This solution was further used for the determination of As using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) (SensaAA, GBC, Hampshire, IL, United States). The solution of As acid (H3AsO4) in HNO3 (0.5 mol l-1 As Certipur®) was used as standard. The absorbance was read at 193.7 nm.

The concentration of P was determined using ammonium molybdate and stannous chloride (Allen, 1989). The absorbance was read at 700 nm.

Measurement of Oxidative Damage

Lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of wheat plants was detected according to Heath and Packer (1968) by measuring the concentration of MDA. The amount of MDA was calculated using extinction coefficient of 155 mM-1 cm-1 and expressed as nmol MDA g-1fresh weight.

Hydrogen peroxide concentrations in leaves and roots were determined according to Velikova et al. (2000). Plant tissue was homogenized in trichloroacetic acid in an ice bath. The supernatant obtained following centrifugation at 16099 × g for 15 min was used for determination of H2O2 concentration. The assay mixture contained supernatant, 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and 1 M potassium iodide (KI). The assay mixture was kept in dark for 1 h and the absorbance was read at 390 nm. The concentration of H2O2 was determined from a standard curve and expressed as H2O2 μg g-1 fresh weight.

Preparation of Enzyme Extract

A fresh sample of leaf or root (1 g) was ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen and homogenized with a mortar and pestle in ice-cold 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 0.1 mM EDTA. The homogenate was centrifuged at 16099 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was used as a crude enzyme source. For APX and DHAR activities, 1 mM AsA and 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol were added into above phosphate buffer, respectively. The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and supernatant was used as enzyme source.

An aliquot of the extract was used to determine protein concentration by the method of Bradford (1976) using bovine serum albumin as the standard. All enzyme activities were expressed as nkat mg-1 protein (1 katal = 1 mol s-1 catalytic activity) in all the treated as well as non-treated plants. All enzymatic measurements were carried out at 25 ± 2°C by using UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter DU®730).

Antioxidant Enzymes Activities

Superoxide dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1) activity was determined following the method by Elavarthi and Martin (2010). The reaction mix consisted of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 2 mM EDTA, 9.9 mM L-methionine, 55 μM NBT, 0.025% triton X-100 and enzyme extract. Reaction was started by addition of 1 mM riboflavin followed by placing the test tubes under 20-W fluorescent bulbs for 15 min. A parallel set of tubes with same reaction mix was kept in dark that served as control, whereas those incubated in light without the enzyme extract served as blank. Activity was measured spectrophotometrically at 560 nm.

One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to bring about 50% inhibition of the rate of NBT reduction measured at 560 nm. CAT (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was determined according to Aebi and Lester (1984) by monitoring the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm due to decomposition of H2O2. GPX (EC 1.11.1.7) activity was assayed as the increase in optical density at 470 nm due to the oxidation of guaiacol to tetra-guaiacol (Egley et al., 1983).

Non-enzymatic Antioxidants

Carotenoids in leaves were extracted in dimethyl sulfoxide and their concentration (mg g-1 fresh weight) was calculated using the formula given by Arnon (1949). For proline estimation, plant tissue was homogenized in 3% sulfosalicylic acid following the method of Bates et al. (1973). The reaction mixture consisted of acid ninhydrin reagent, glacial acetic acid and supernatant. Toluene was added to the reaction mixture, and absorbance was recorded at 520 nm. The concentration of α-tocopherol (μg g-1 fresh weight) was determined according to Sadasivam and Manickam (2008).

Components of Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle

Ascorbate peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.11) activity was estimated following the protocol of Nakano and Asada (1981). The enzyme activity was calculated by using an extinction coefficient of 2.8 mM-1cm-1. GR (EC 1.6.4.2) activity was measured according to Smith et al. (1989) by monitoring the reduction of 5-5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) to 5-thionitrobenzoic acid (TNB) by glutathione in the reaction at 412 nm.

Monodehydroascorbate reductase (EC 1.6.5.4) activity was assessed according to the method of Miyake and Asada (1992). The decrease in absorbance was read at 340 nm.

Dehydroascorbate reductase (EC 1.8.5.1) activity was assayed by following the method of Nakano and Asada (1981). An increase in absorbance was read at 265 nm, and DHAR activity was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 7.0 mM-1 cm-1. One unit (U) of enzyme activity is defined as 1 nmol DHA reduced min-1.

Concentrations of ascorbate (AsA) and dehydroascorbate (DHA) were determined using the methods of Arakawa et al. (1981) and Nakagawara and Sagisaka (1984). 0.1 g of fresh tissue (roots and leaves) was homogenized in 10 ml of cold 5% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. The homogenate was centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant was used for the AsA and total ascorbate (AsA + DHA) assay. Total ascorbate was determined through a reduction of DHA to ascorbate by dithiothreitol (DTT). DHA concentrations were estimated subtracting AsA from total ascorbate. A standard curve in the range 0–10 μmol of ascorbate or DHA was plotted to find out the related contents.

Total glutathione was determined by following the method of Wang and Jiao (2000). Estimation of GSH was done following the method of Wu et al. (2006). GSSG was obtained by subtracting GSH from total GSH.

Enzymes of Glyoxalase System

Glyoxalase I (EC 4.4.1.5) activity was determined according to the method of Hossain et al. (2009). Briefly, the assay mixture contained 100 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 15 mM magnesium sulfate, 1.7 mM GSH, and 3.5 mM MG in a final volume of 700 μl. The increase in absorbance was recorded at 240 nm for 1 min and the activity was calculated using the extinction coefficient of 3.37 mM-1 cm-1.

Glyoxalase II (EC 3.1.2.6) activity was assessed following the method of Principato et al. (1987) by examining the formation of GSH at 412 nm for 1 min. The increase in absorbance was recorded at 412 nm for 1 min and the activity was computed using the extinction coefficient of 13.6 mM-1 cm-1.

Thiol Metabolites and Related Enzyme

Cysteine concentration was estimated according to Gaitonde (1967). The reaction mixture consisted of acid ninhydrin reagent II, glacial acetic acid and supernatant. Following the development of pink color absorbance was recorded at 560 nm. Cysteine concentration was calculated using 28 mM-1 cm-1 as extinction coefficient, expressed as nmol g-1 fresh weight. NPSHs were determined following Ellman (1959) using Ellman’s reagent (5 mM EDTA, 0.6 mM DTNB present in 0.12 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5). Concentration of NPSHs was calculated using 13.1 mM-1 cm-1 as extinction coefficient and expressed as nmol g-1 fresh weight. PCs were determined by calculating the difference between total NPSHs and GSH (Bhargava et al., 2005).

Glutathione-S-transferase (EC 2.5.1.18) activity was estimated by the method of Habig and Jakoby (1981).

Statistical Analysis

All the numerical data obtained from the experiments was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, United States; IBM Corporation, United States). One-way ANOVA was performed for comparing significant differences among individual means. Two-way ANOVA was performed for studying interaction between mycorrhizal and As treatments. Differences between the individual means were compared using Duncan’s test.

Results

Triticum aestivum var. HD2967 plants successfully formed AM when inoculated with R. intraradices (M1) or G. etunicatum (M2) (Supplementary Figure ). The percent root colonization ranged between 52 and 61% for M1 and between 58 and 70% for M2. Mock-inoculated plants stayed NM (Figure ). The percent root colonization in M2 fungal species decreased with increase in As in soil. While it increased in M1 plants at lower addition levels of As (25 mg kg-1 soil) and then gradually decreased at higher concentrations (50 and 100 mg kg-1 soil). Mycorrhizal colonization was significantly influenced by As, AMF and their interaction (Table ).

Effect of As addition levels on Triticum aestivum L. var. HD-2967 root colonization by Rhizoglomus intraradices (M1) and Glomus etunicatum (M2). Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

Two-way analysis revealed significant influence of As and AMF inoculation on dry weights of shoots as well as roots (Table ). In response to increase in As concentrations, wheat plants exhibited decrease in plant biomass (Table ). The reduction was seen in both NM and M plants and was dependent on As concentration in soil. However, at all concentrations of As, M plants showed higher biomass as compared to NM plants with an exception of shoot parameters at 50 mg As kg-1 soil for M1. Response to mycorrhizal treatment was most evident at 100 mg As kg-1 soil, where shoot and root biomass of M wheat was near twofold (M1) or more than twofolds (M2) that of NM. Overall the performance of wheat plants with respect to its biomass was highest in M2. Biomass of grains (1000 grains) decreased with increase in As stress, with grains from NM plants registering a greater decline than M plants. At 100 mg As kg-1 soil treatment, grain biomass declined in NM by 44% while in M1 and M2 it declined by 36% over their respective controls (0 mg As kg-1 soil).

As in Plant Tissue

The concentration of As increased steadily in shoots and roots of both NM and M plants with increasing amount of As in soil (Table ). Two-way ANOVA analysis showed significant independent effects of As and AMF on concentration of As in root and shoot, however, no significant As × AMF interaction was observed (Table ). The inoculation with M1 or M2 significantly reduced As concentration in both shoots and roots with respect to NM (Table ). As concentration decreased in shoots of M1 plants by 52, 5.83, and 7.20%, and that of M2 plants by 54, 14.8, and 10.1% at 25, 50, and 100 mg As kg-1 soil, respectively, when compared with NM counterparts. In roots, inoculation with M1 decreased As concentration by 21.7, 11.2, and 18.5% over NM plants at 25, 50, and 100 mg As kg-1 soil, respectively. Whereas M2 decreased As concentration by 36.3, 36.5, and 29.7% at 25, 50, and 100 mg As kg-1soil as compared to NM. Thus the proportion of decrease was higher in roots compared to shoots in M plants at higher concentrations. However, in contrast the content of As in M plant tissue (shoot and root) was higher than NM plants at higher levels of As stress. As content was maximum in tissues of M2 plants followed by M1 and NM at 100 mg As kg-1 soil.

Arsenic concentration in grain increased with increase in As in soil (Table ). However, at all levels of As in soil, its concentration was far less in grains of M plants compared to NM plants. Arsenic concentration declined by 28, 27, and 24.5% in M1 and by 60, 42, and 45% in M2 at 25, 50, and 100 mg As kg-1soil compared to their NM counterparts.

P Concentration

Mycorrhizal condition, level of As in soil and their interaction had strong effects on P concentration in shoot and root of wheat plants (Table ). P concentration markedly declined in plants in response to As exposure (Table ). Inoculation by AMF alleviated the antagonistic effect of As, and significantly enhanced P-accumulation in both shoot and root compared to NM counterparts at all levels of As. At 100 mg As kg-1 soil, P-uptake was most adversely affected, and the ameliorative effect of AMF was also evident at this As level. At all levels of As in soil, P:As ratio was higher in M over NM plants (Table ).

Translocation and Bioaccumulation Factor

The TF decreased in NM plants with increase in concentration of As in soil (Table ). Inoculation by AMF showed variable effect on TF (shoot:root), while in low dose of As (25 mg kg-1soil), there was decline in TF in M plants. In moderate and high levels of As, in contrast to decrease in NM, significant increase in TF was observed in M1 and M2 treatments. However, translocation of As from shoot to grains was lesser in M plants (M1 and M2) than NM plants (Table ). The As bioaccumulation factor decreased with increase up to 50 mg As kg-1 soil, and further decreased with higher concentration in all the treatments. Mycorrhizal plants accumulated less amount of As as compared to NM plants with M2 plants showing a less As accumulation than M1 plants.

Oxidative Damage

With increase in As in soil, there was a gradual increase in H2O2 concentrations in M and NM wheat plants (Figures ). The H2O2 level was higher in roots as compared to shoots. In shoots, the H2O2 concentration was significantly influenced by As stress, AMF treatments and their interaction (Table ). M2 plants continued to maintain lowest H2O2 concentration level followed by M1 and NM plants. Regardless of the intensity of As toxicity, M plants displayed lower H2O2 concentration than corresponding NM plants; however, the differences were not significant between AMF treatments in roots up to 50 mg As kg-1soil (Figure ).

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on concentrations of H2O2 in (A) shoot and (B) root and MDA in (C) shoot and (D) root of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants. Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where NM, non-mycorrhizal; M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

Lipid peroxidation (measured as concentration of MDA) showed a linear increase with corresponding increase in the concentration of As in the soil (Figures ). Again the level of lipid peroxidation was very high in root in comparison to shoot in all the treatments. Mycorrhizal plants showed lower levels of lipid peroxidation than the corresponding NM plants at each As level (except M1 at 25 mg As kg-1 soil in shoot). Two-way analysis revealed significant interaction between As concentration and AMF inoculation on root MDA concentration whereas no significant effect of their interaction was observed in shoot MDA concentrations (Table ).

Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Two-way ANOVA showed significant influence of As, AMF and interactive effects of As × AMF on activities of SOD, CAT, GPX, and APX in shoots as well as roots (Table ). SOD activity was highest among all the antioxidant enzyme activities (Figures ). The increase in As-induced SOD activity led to concomitant increment in activities of H2O2 scavenging enzymes — CAT and GPX (SOD-CAT: rshoot = 0.91; rroot = 0.79; SOD-GPX: rshoot = 0.90; rroot = 0.86). The activities of these enzymes were higher in tissues of M plants (Figures ). The APX activity increased in plants with increase in intensity of As stress from 25 to 50 mg As kg-1 soil, thereafter it decreased at 100 mg As kg-1 soil in roots of NM and M1 plants. The enzyme activity was higher in M plants (Figures ).

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on the activities of SOD in (A) shoot and (B) root, CAT in (C) shoot and (D) root, GPX in (E) shoot and (F) root and APX in (G) shoot and (H) root of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants. Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where NM, non-mycorrhizal; M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

Non-enzymatic Antioxidants Molecules

Two-way ANOVA showed significant influence of As, AMF individually and their interactive effects on carotenoids, proline, and α-tocopherol concentrations (Table ). The concentration of carotenoids increased at initial levels of As concentration (25 mg As kg-1 soil) in NM and M plants. The concentration declined with increase in As at 50 and 100 mg As kg-1 soil, but the concentration of carotenoids in M plants (M1 and M2) at 50 mg As kg-1 soil was higher than the concentrations at 0 mg As kg-1 soil, similarly in M2 plants the carotenoid concentration increased at 100 mg As kg-1 soil (Table ). Inoculation of AMF led to an overall increased level of carotenoids as compared to the NM plants, although this extent of increase varied with each As addition level.

Proline concentration increased at lower addition levels of As (25 mg As kg-1 soil) in NM plants while it decreased in M plants in both shoot and root. As the addition levels of As increased (50 mg As kg-1soil) proline concentration in shoots decreased in NM and M2 plants, showing a hike in M1 plants. In roots, the concentration increased in M1 and NM plants while it decreased in M2 plants. With a higher addition level of As (100 mg As kg-1soil) proline concentration decreased in both shoot and root of NM and M1 plants and increased in M2 plants. Both the mycobionts did not show a definite pattern of increase reporting that both AMF responded differently to each As treatment. However, at highest As addition level (100 mg As kg-1soil) proline concentration was higher in M plants than NM plants both in shoot and root. Concentration of α-tocopherol enhanced on increasing the As stress in NM, M1, and M2 plants; however, in plants inoculated with M1 and M2, level of α-tocopherol was higher than that of NM plants.

The concentrations of AsA, DHA were influenced by As treatments, consequently AsA:DHA ratio also changed (Figures ). In roots the value was highest in M2 plants at 25 and 50 mg As kg-1soil, while slight effect of AMF treatment was evident at 100 mg As kg-1 soil. The total ascorbate concentration significantly increased with increase up to 50 mg As kg-1 soil, beyond this the change was not significant in NM plants (Table ). However, M plants sustained increase in total ascorbate with increase in As stress

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on the ratio of AsA:DHA in (A) shoot and (B) root, activities of MDHAR in (C) shoot and (D) root and DHAR in (E) shoot and (F) root of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants. Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where NM, non-mycorrhizal; M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

At all levels of As stress, MDHAR activity was higher in M plants as compared with that of NM plants (Figures ). Similarly, at all levels of As, DHAR activity was higher in M plants (Figures ). Interestingly, in shoot DHAR showed strong positive correlation with GSH and GSSG (DHAR-GSH: rshoot = 0.83; DHAR-GSSG: rshoot = 0.84), in contrast in root it showed weak negative correlation with these parameters (DHAR-GSH: rroot = -0.33; DHAR-GSSG: rroot = -0.44).

Two-way ANOVA revealed significant influence of As, AMF and interactive effects of As × AMF on concentration of GSH in shoot as well as root (Table ). In shoot, As exposure to plants resulted in varied response in different AMF treatments in terms of GSH concentration (Figure ). With increase in As in soil from 0 to 50 mg As kg-1soil, a significant increase in concentration of GSH was observed, with an exception of M1 plants where GSH concentration showed a striking increase at initial levels of As (25 mg kg-1 soil) but thereafter declined at 50 mg As kg-1 soil. With further escalation in As to 100 mg kg-1 soil, a decrease in GSH level was observed in NM plants while M1 and M2 plants showed non-significant change. In root, there was a steady decline in concentration of GSH with increasing concentration of As (Figure ). However, in M plants the GSH concentration was greater as compared to NM plants.

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on concentrations of GSH in (A) shoot and (B) root, GSSG in (C) shoot and (D) root, ratio of GSH:GSSG in (E) shoot and (F) root and the activity of GR in (G) shoot and (H) root of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants. Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where NM, non-mycorrhizal; M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

Two-way ANOVA revealed significant influence of As, AMF and interactive effects of As × AMF on the concentration of GSSG in shoot as well as root (Table ). In shoot, at all levels of As stress the concentration of GSSG was highest in M2 followed by M1 and NM plants (Figure ). In contrast in root GSSG showed decrease with increasing levels of As stress. However, at low levels of As stress (0 and 25 mg As kg-1 soil), GSSG concentration was higher in M plants (Figure ). At higher levels (50 and 100 mg As kg-1 soil), the effect of the two AMF species was variable.

In shoot as well as root of NM plants, the GSH:GSSG ratio decreased with increase in As concentration. In M plants (M1 and M2) there was not a definite pattern in variation of GSH:GSSG ratio, although their value remained higher than NM equivalents (Figures ).

Two-way ANOVA revealed significant influence of As, AMF and interactive effects of As × AMF treatment on GR activity in shoot as well as root (Table ). Activity of GR enhanced on increasing the concentration of As in NM, M1, and M2 plants, however, GR activity was more in M1 and M2 plants as compared to NM plants (Figures ). GR activity and GSH concentration in shoot showed moderate positive correlation, however, these showed weak negative correlation in root (GR-GSH: rshoot = -0.61; rroot = -0.41).

Glyoxalase System

No significant increase was found in Gly I activity in shoot and root of NM plants at all concentrations of As (Figures ). While in M plants Gly I activity increased at higher concentrations of As (50 and 100 mg kg-1 soil).

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on the activities of Gly I in (A) shoot and (B) root and Gly II in (C) shoot and (D) root of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants. Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where NM, non-mycorrhizal; M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

The activity of Gly II increased with increase in the concentration of As in shoots of both NM and M plants (Figure ). However, the increase was non-significant between 0 and 25 mg As kg-1 soil for NM plants. Mycorrhizal plants exhibited higher enzyme activity at all levels of As corresponding to NM plants. In roots the activity of Gly II exhibited no significant increase at 25 mg As kg-1 soil but increased significantly at 50 and 100 mg As kg-1 soil in both NM and M plants with higher increase of the enzyme activity in M plants (Figure ). Two-way analysis revealed significant effects of As and AMF treatments independently and by their interaction on Gly I activity both in shoot and root, and Gly II activity in shoot. However, Gly II activity was significantly influenced by As and AMF in root but remained unaffected by their interaction (Table ).

Thiol Metabolites

Cysteine and NPSHs were significantly influenced by As and AMF treatments independently as well as by their interaction (Table ). Cysteine showed a gradual rise in shoot and root with increase in As in soil in all the treatments (Figures ). The positive influence of AMF inoculation was apparent in higher levels of As (50 and 100 mg kg-1) additions. Concentration of NPSHs increased with rise in As from 25 to 50 mg As kg-1 soil, a further surge in As exposure to 100 mg As kg-1 soil resulted in sharp decline in NM plants (root and shoot) (Figures ). In M2 plants the level of NPSHs remained maximum at all levels of As stress. The concentration of PCs increased with increase in As from 25 to 50 mg kg-1 soil in all treatments (Figures ). However, positive effect of AMF inoculation was evident distinctly only at 100 mg As kg-1 soil. Another interesting observation is that the concentrations of thiol metabolites are higher in root in comparison to shoot.

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on concentrations of cysteine in (A) shoot and (B) root, NPSHs in (C) shoot and (D) root and PCs in (E) shoot and (F) root of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants. Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where NM, non-mycorrhizal; M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

The GST activity showed no significant effect in shoot of NM plants, while it enhanced with increase in the concentration of As in the soil in M plants (Figure ). In root the enzyme activity increased significantly in M plants while, in NM plant there was increase in the activity up to 50 mg As kg-1 soil (Figure ). Beyond this it declined. The activity of GST was significantly influenced by treatments of As and AMF independently as well as by their interaction in both shoot and root (Table ).

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on the activity of GST in (A) shoot and (B) root of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants. Data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 5). Bars showing different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Duncan’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05); where NM, non-mycorrhizal; M1, R. intraradices; M2, G. etunicatum.

Discussion

Arsenic additions had variable effects on the percentage of T. aestivum root colonized by R. intraradices and G. etunicatum. The reports on effect of As on percent of root colonized are not consistent. While many experiments have reported no decrease in percent colonization when As was artificially added to soil (Trotta et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2007; Christophersen et al., 2009), there are reports of reduction in colonization (Liu et al., 2005; Garg et al., 2015), and also an increase (Al Agely et al., 2005). In spite of this difference in root colonization with respect to As, each mycobiont conferred benefits to the host plant. Nevertheless the extent of assistance varied with AMF species participating in the formation of AM, and the parameter assayed. At each level of As in soil, M plants continued to display better growth than NM plants, suggesting alleviation of As toxicity.

Root and shoot As concentrations in wheat plants increased proportionately to the level of As added to the soil. However, As concentrations were higher in tissues (root, shoot, and grain) of NM plants than M plants. The greater biomass has ensued dilution of the harmful metalloid in plant tissues, limiting its toxic effect. AM mediated significant dilution of As in plant tissues has been previously reported (Liu et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Cozzolino et al., 2010). In contrast at higher levels of As stress, the content of As in M plant tissue (shoot and root) was higher than NM plants. Reports on total As content in AM plants are variable, with values higher than in NM plants observed in both roots and shoots of maize (Xia et al., 2007) and lower values in sunflower and lentil (Ahmed et al., 2006; Ultra et al., 2007). Increased total As content in AM plants may be the result of more extensive root systems in the larger plants that make an important contribution on a whole plant basis (Chen et al., 2007).

Since arsenate [As(V)] and inorganic phosphate (Pi) have similar properties, it is expected that there exists a competition between As(V) and Pi in all cellular processes. Foremost, As(V) competes with Pi for entry (Meharg, 1994; Zhao et al., 2010). Thereafter, cytoplasmic As(V) contends for phosphate binding sites and hence inhibits metabolic processes (Geng et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2010a; Srivastava and Sharma, 2013). Therefore, maintenance of a high cytosolic P:As ratio is necessary in order to enhance plant As tolerance. In this study, P concentration in plant tissues decreased as the As concentration in the soil increased causing an As-induced P deficiency. This may be one of the crucial reasons accounting for the reduction in growth of T. aestivum plants under As stress observed in the study. However, our observation that AMF-colonized plants resulted in higher shoot and root P concentrations compared to NM plants in As spiked soil, shows the potential of AM in preserving the P homeostasis. These results are in accordance to earlier reports wherein AM plants displayed selective uptake and transfer of P over As (Chen et al., 2007; Dong et al., 2008). The capacity of M plants to sustain a high P:As ratio is one of the key reasons for plant tolerance to As toxicity (Liu et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Cozzolino et al., 2010).

The AM pathway involves Pi uptake by the external hyphae and translocation to the plant through fungal hyphae and transfer across specialized symbiotic interfaces in root cortical cells (Smith and Read, 2008). This pathway overcomes severe diffusion limitation, bypasses the sharp depletion zones close to roots and delivers Pi direct to root cortical cells (Smith and Read, 2008). In addition, fungal translocation of P is extremely rapid, and involves movement of polyphosphate from sites of Pi absorption to sites of breakdown and transfer to plant cells (Ezawa et al., 2002). Since polyarsenate is not formed (due to low stability), As(V) cannot be translocated in the same way. Furthermore establishment of the AM pathway is commonly accompanied by a decreased contribution of the direct pathway (Smith et al., 2010a; Chen et al., 2013).

Separate Pi transporters play key roles in the direct and AM uptake pathways, with AM-inducible plant transporters expressed in colonized cells in the root cortex of plants (Smith et al., 2003; Bucher, 2007; Javot et al., 2007). In rice effect of mycorrhizal inoculation on phosphate transporters (OsPTs) under As stress has been studied in detail. Arsenate uptake is reported to be restricted as the expressions of 6 out of 11 phosphate transporters in rice roots were decreased upon mycorrhizal symbiosis (Paszkowski et al., 2002). AMF are able to assist the plant to obtain phosphate by inducing OsPT11, which transport Pi between cells rather than between outside media and cell (Glassop et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2013). Therefore, it is assumed that mycorrhiza-specific Pi uptake system controls the direct uptake system and helps the wheat to take up more phosphate and less arsenate, resulting in higher P:As ratio observed in this study. Nevertheless, more study on effect of AMF inoculation on phosphate transporters of wheat (T. aestivum) under different levels of As(V) stress is required to confirm this.

Formation of AM in wheat roots influenced distribution of As in plant tissues. The TF increased at higher concentrations of As, contradictory to the observations of Dong et al. (2008). An enhancement in As TF in M plants may presumably be due to larger magnitude of decline in As concentration in root as compared with shoots. Also supported by an increase in the As storing capacity of the leaves (by virtue of increased biomass) and/or As exclusion in root (Trotta et al., 2006). The latter is also supported by low bioaccumulation values observed in M plants at high As addition. However, further As translocation to wheat grain was reduced as evident by lower As grain:shoot ratio in M plants compared with NM plants at each level of As stress. Less As accumulation in grain would have immense significance with respect to As toxicity in food chain.

Arsenate uptake triggered oxidative stress resulting in increased generation of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation as reported in earlier studies (Singh et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2013). Interestingly, the levels of oxidative stress were much higher in roots than in shoots. This observation supports the view that most of the As(V) taken up by the plant is reduced to As(III) in the roots (Smith et al., 2010a). To cope with enhanced levels of oxidative stress, plants are equipped with antioxidant system that gets activated under As stress (Singh et al., 2007; Sobrino-Plata et al., 2014). APX, GPX, and CAT play a crucial role in H2O2 degradation. Under As stress, activities of these enzymes were enhanced due to a higher level of H2O2. This is in agreement with our results where the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPX, and APX) and concentration of α-tocopherols increased with concentration of As in soil.

The present study demonstrates a reduction in As-induced oxidative damage in wheat plants colonized by R. intraradices or G. etunicatum. The alleviation potential of AM was more evident with increase in severity of As stress. Mycorrhizal plants displayed lower lipid peroxidation and H2O2 levels than NM plants. Several studies have shown that when subjected to stress, lipid peroxidation is lesser in M than the NM plants indicating that AMF inoculation helps in reduction of oxidative damage (Evelin and Kapoor, 2014; Tan et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Jiang et al., 2016). It is widely accepted that diminishing H2O2 levels is one of the strategies by which AM protects plants against diverse stresses (Hajiboland et al., 2010; Ruiz-Sánchez et al., 2010; Garg and Bhandari, 2012). Recently, it has been observed that H2O2 is effusive in roots and there was a higher net H2O2 efflux in roots when colonized by AMF via aquaporin channels present on the membranes of external hyphae (Zou et al., 2015).

A better ROS scavenging system in M wheat plants is observed in accordance with earlier studies (Garg and Kaur, 2013; Garg and Chandel, 2015). Alpha-tocopherols disrupt the chain propagation step in lipid auto-oxidation (Serbinonva and Packer, 1994), while carotenoids protect photosynthetic apparatus by quenching ROS (Collins, 2001). Proline is reported to inhibit the apoptotic responses triggered by a variety of abiotic stresses by scavenging intracellular hydroxyl radical, in addition to its well-established role as an osmolyte (Chen and Dickman, 2005; Ozden et al., 2009; Gill and Tuteja, 2010; Carvalho et al., 2015). Enhanced proline synthesis plays an important role in refilling NADPH to maintain GSH and ASA in the reduced state by potentiating pentose-phosphate pathway activity (Verbruggen and Hermans, 2008). Under all As levels, AMF colonization consistently increased concentrations of the antioxidant molecules α-tocopherol and carotenoids while the concentration of proline was more in M plants at high As level. Higher concentration of these antioxidants contribute to drop in lipid peroxidation in M plants.

Superoxide dismutase is a metalloenzyme and exists in different isoforms based on the metal cofactor: iron (Fe-SOD), manganese (Mn-SOD), and copper–zinc (Cu–Zn SOD; Alscher et al., 2002). The activity of each SOD isoform is influenced by the availability of respective co-factor (Alguacil et al., 2003). Similarly, CAT and APX are metalloenzymes, and their enzymatic activity is dependent on the availability of their cofactors. Enhanced activity of SOD, CAT, and APX may be due to higher uptake of these micronutrients in M plants. Further SOD, CAT, and GPX transcripts or enzymatic activity often increase in response to As exposure (Mylona et al., 1998; Stoeva and Bineva, 2003; Srivastava et al., 2005; Abercrombie et al., 2008; Ahsan et al., 2008; Norton et al., 2008; Chakrabarty et al., 2009). This explains induction of these enzyme activities in NM plants in the present study also. However, the isoforms of the various enzymes are differentially expressed in response to As(V) and As(III) (Finnegan and Chen, 2012). It is known that AMF colonization has considerable effect on the composition of As species and their accumulation in plant (Zhang et al., 2014). The changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes in M plants may be due to differential influence on different isoforms as a result of alteration in As speciation and their cellular distribution. However, the preparation procedure of the samples for enzymatic assays does not include organellar isoenzymes in this study. Further investigations are required to validate this.

In plants ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) pathway is the second main component for neutralizing H2O2. The AsA-GSH antioxidant defense pathway consists of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. The accumulation of ascorbate is one of the main effects of As(V) uptake (Srivastava et al., 2005; Singh et al., 2006; Khan et al., 2009). In this study also, increase in As(V) in soil stimulated accumulation of ascorbate in wheat plants. However, the concentration of AsA was higher in M plants compared with NM plants. AM fungal colonization resulted in higher activities of DHAR and MDHAR in comparison with NM plants, and thus explains a higher level of AsA in M plants. Mycorrhizal plants upheld a higher P:As ratio and consequently prevent replacement of Pi by As(V) during photophosphorylation for the synthesis of ATP. Consequently As-induced adverse effects on photosynthesis get alleviated in M plants. Hence higher concentration of AsA may also be due to more primary metabolites available for its synthesis in M plants.

The GSH:GSSG ratio plays an important role in maintaining the redox state of the cell and, GR plays a crucial role in maintaining the GSH:GSSG ratio by catalyzing reduction of GSSG to GSH (Dixit et al., 2015a). As addition levels led to a significant increase in GSH as well as GSSG concentrations in shoots of wheat, while the ratio of GSH:GSSG decreased. These results are consistent with the observations of Hasanuzzaman and Fujita (2013). Despite of the enhanced levels of GSSG and stimulation of GR activity in NM plants up to 50 mg As kg-1 soil, GSH:GSSG declined. It suggests that As triggered activation of GR was not adequate to overcome GSH consumption in As(III) complexation (Jozefczak et al., 2012). AM appeared to maintain a favorable GSH:GSSG ratio due to, (i) decreased oxidative stress owing to the reduced concentration of As in plant tissue (root as well as shoot); (ii) better ability to detoxify H2O2 by other components of oxidative defense system (higher enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants) hence relieving pressure on GSH to maintain cellular redox state; (iii) more biosynthesis of GSH.

The glyoxalase system prevents buildup of MG, and converts it to non-toxic hydroxyacids such as lactate. It consists of two enzymes (Gly I and Gly II) acting in concert. The upregulation or overexpression of these enzymes has been reported to impart tolerance to abiotic stresses (Singla-Pareek et al., 2008; Saxena et al., 2011). In this study, M plants demonstrated higher activities of Gly I and Gly II at any level of As than NM plants which suggested more efficient detoxification of MG in M plants. These results are in agreement with observations of Shamshiri and Fattahi (2014) where M plants showed lower MG concentration than NM plants under salt stress. Furthermore, a few studies have reported higher expression of Gly I in M plants (Campos-Soriano et al., 2011; Fan and Liu, 2011).

Detoxification mechanisms for As(III) include efflux from the roots, sequestration in cell vacuoles and complexation with thiols (PCs and glutathione) for which As(III) has very high-affinity. Glutathione protects the cell from free metal ions by forming non-toxic complexes and facilitates their sequestration while the enzyme GST catalyzes these conjugations (Jozefczak et al., 2012). Uptake of As induced the increase in concentration of thiol metabolites (GSH, NPSHs, and PCs) and incited GST activity suggesting inherent As tolerance in the wheat cultivar used in this study. However, AMF colonization (both M1 or M2) further increased the concentrations of these metabolites and GST activity, suggesting more capacity in M plants to sequester As also reflected by higher As content in M roots than NM roots.

The biosynthesis of GSH (and PCs) requires adequate supplies of glutamine, cysteine, and glycine. Among these, cysteine is by far the limiting substrate for GSH biosynthesis (Noctor et al., 1998). Increase in concentration of cysteine in NM and M plants explains enhanced concentration of GSH, NPSHs, and PCs. Further higher levels of cysteine in M than NM plants resulted in higher concentration of GSH, NPSHs, and PCs in them. Several studies have reported effect of S supply on As uptake, translocation and accumulation in plants (Fan et al., 2013; Dixit et al., 2015a,b; Srivastava et al., 2016). Concomitant studies on AM have shown that in addition to other nutrients (N, P), sulfur (S) compounds are symbiotically transferred from AM fungus to host plants (Casieri et al., 2012; Sieh et al., 2013). Symbiosis by AMF contributes to plant’s S nutrition by transport of S, as well as organic S-containing compounds (such as cysteine, methionine, and glutathione), via the mycorrhizal pathway (Allen and Shachar-Hill, 2009). Therefore, it is tempting to propose here that the higher concentrations of the thiol compounds observed in the present study may be due to enhanced uptake and assimilation of S in M over NM plants. However, more studies are needed to relate S metabolism in M plants with As tolerance.

The present study demonstrates an increased As tolerance in mycorrhizal wheat plants. The study reveals multifarious role of AMF in alleviation of As toxicity. Formation of AM has systemic effect on the physiology and biochemistry of the host plants. The effects of R. intraradices and G. etunicatum in alleviation of As stress were largely same. However, extent of response varied with the level of As stress, participating mycobiont and the parameter analyzed. Higher As tolerance in M plants (i) is not due to decreased up take of As but due to dilution effect as a result of more biomass; (ii) more favorable P:As ratio; (iii) a better antioxidative capacity; (iv) augmented glyoxalase system, and (v) higher thiol metabolites to sequester As. However, more studies are required to decipher the physiological and molecular basis of changes in antioxidant system and thiol metabolites in M plants under As-stress.

Author Contributions

SS executed the experiments. GA and NS executed some of the experiments and helped in the preparation of the manuscript. RK designed the work, analyzed and interpreted the data, wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer PCS and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation, and the handling Editor states that the process met the standards of a fair and objective review.

Table 1

Two-way ANOVA analysis of Arsenic addition levels (As), mycorrhizal treatments (AMF) and their interactions (As × AMF) on variables of Triticum aestivum L. var. HD-2967 studied.

Significance	SHOOT			ROOT
	As	AMF treatments	As × AMF	As	AMF treatments	As × AMF
Dry weight	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
Thousand grain weight	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗	nd	nd	nd
As concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	ns	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	ns
P concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
H2O2 concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
MDA concentration	∗	∗∗∗	ns	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
SOD activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
CAT activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
GPX activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
APX activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
Carotenoids concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	nd	nd	nd
Proline concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
α-Tocopherol concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
Total ascorbate concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
MDHAR activity	∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗	ns	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
DHAR activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
GSH concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
GSSG concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
GR activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
Gly I activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗
Gly II activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗	∗∗∗	∗∗	ns
Cysteine concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
NPSHs concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
PC concentration	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗
GST activity	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗	∗∗∗

Table 2

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on biomass of various parts of T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants.

As addition levels (mg kg-1 soil)	AMF treatment	Dry weight (g)
		Shoot	Root	Grain (1000)
0	NM	3.0 ± 0.07 f	1.5 ± 0.02 e	43.7 ± 1.01 e
	M1	3.9 ± 0.09 g	1.9 ± 0.02 h	52.7 ± 1.54 f
	M2	4.1 ± 0.05 g	1.9 ± 0.04 h	55.2 ± 1.18 f
25	NM	1.9 ± 0.02 d	1.1 ± 0.02 c	37.6 ± 0.95 d
	M1	2.2 ± 0.24 e	1.6 ± 0.03 f	42.1 ± 0.10 e
	M2	3.9 ± 0.04 g	1.8 ± 0.04 g	53.8 ± 0.85 f
50	NM	1.0 ± 0.02 b	0.9 ± 0.03 b	29.9 ± 1.01 b
	M1	0.9 ± 0.03 ab	1.4 ± 0.02 d	35.3 ± 1.08 cd
	M2	2.4 ± 0.15 e	1.7 ± 0.03 f	42.7 ± 1.11 e
100	NM	0.7 ± 0.21 a	0.6 ± 0.01 a	24.6 ± 1.26 a
	M1	1.4 ± 0.04 c	1.1 ± 0.01 c	33.9 ± 4.62 c
	M2	1.8 ± 0.03 d	1.4 ± 0.02 d	35.3 ± 1.45 cd

Table 3

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on As concentration, As content, and phosphorus concentration in T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants.

As addition levels (mg kg-1 soil)	AMF treatment	As concentration (μg g-1 dry weight)			Arsenic content (g)		P concentration (mg g-1)
		Shoot	Root	Grain	Shoot	Root	Shoot	Root
0	NM	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	6.9 ± 0.06 g	6.2 ± 0.07 gh
	M1	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	7.2 ± 0.04 h	6.7 ± 0.14 i
	M2	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	7.8 ± 0.13 k	6.7 ± 0.12 i
25	NM	11.1 ± 0.7 b	15.4 ± 0.6 b	0.8 ± 0.06 d	21.7 ± 1.9 c	17.4 ± 0.7 a	6.5 ± 0.03 f	5.5 ± 0.03 f
	M1	5.3 ± 0.3 a	12.0 ± 0.5 a	0.5 ± 0.02 c	11.9 ± 2.2 b	19.4 ± 1.3 a	7.4 ± 0.02 i	6.0 ± 0.08 g
	M2	5.1 ± 0.1 a	9.8 ± 0.2 a	0.3 ± 0.01 a	19.7 ± 0.4 bc	17.7 ± 0.7 a	7.5 ± 0.04 j	6.3 ± 0.14 h
50	NM	22.8 ± 1.3 d	39.9 ± 3.5 e	0.8 ± 0.05 d	21.7 ± 2.1 c	37.5 ± 3.3 b	5.5 ± 0.04 d	4.1 ± 0.33 c
	M1	21.5 ± 0.9 d	35.4 ± 2.5 d	0.6 ± 0.04 c	20.8 ± 0.8 bc	48.8 ± 4.5 d	5.6 ± 0.02 d	4.4 ± 0.14 d
	M2	19.4 ± 0.1 c	25.3 ± 1.5 c	0.5 ± 0.02 b	46.0 ± 3.6 de	41.8 ± 2.5 c	6.0 ± 0.08 e	5.1 ± 0.02 e
100	NM	31.5 ± 0.3 f	53.8 ± 1.7 g	2.0 ± 0.04 g	22.4 ± 7.9 c	33.7 ± 2.2 b	3.5 ± 0.01 a	2.9 ± 0.04 a
	M1	29.2 ± 2.7 e	43.8 ± 1.7 f	1.5 ± 0.04 f	39.5 ± 3.4 d	48.4 ± 2.9 d	4.7 ± 0.02 b	3.3 ± 0.04 b
	M2	28.3 ± 0.7 e	37.8 ± 2.8 de	1.1 ± 0.08 e	52.3 ± 2.5 e	51.2 ± 4.8 d	5.1 ± 0.05 c	3.9 ± 0.03 c

Table 4

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on phosphorus:arsenic ratio, As translocation from root to shoot and shoot to grain and bioaccumulation factor in T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants.

As addition levels (mg kg-1 soil)	AMF treatment	Phosphorus:Arsenic ratio		Translocation factor		Bioaccumulation factor
		Shoot	Root	Shoot:Root	Grain:Shoot
0	NM	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
	M1	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
	M2	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
25	NM	582.6	354.8	0.7	0.06	0.6
	M1	1384.6	502.5	0.4	0.10	0.5
	M2	1462.9	647.6	0.5	0.05	0.4
50	NM	241.3	102.3	0.5	0.03	0.8
	M1	261.4	123.2	0.6	0.02	0.7
	M2	308.6	202.2	0.8	0.02	0.5
100	NM	111.7	54.2	0.6	0.06	0.5
	M1	161.0	76.0	0.7	0.05	0.4
	M2	180.7	103.6	0.7	0.03	0.4

Table 5

Effect of As addition levels and AMF treatments on concentrations of carotenoids, proline, α-tocopherol and total ascorbate in T. aestivum L. var. HD-2967 plants.

As addition levels (mg kg-1 soil)	AMF treatment	Carotenoids(μg g-1 fresh weight)	Proline(μg g-1 fresh weight)		α-Tocopherol(μg g-1 fresh weight)		Total ascorbate(μg g-1 fresh weight)
		Shoot	Shoot	Root	Shoot	Root	Shoot	Root
0	NM	766.7 ± 13.7 b	57.2 ± 1.8 a	78.7 ± 0.9 a	7.52 ± 0.9 a	4.9 ± 1.2 a	125.5 ± 4.9 a	268.8 ± 7.7 a
	M1	970.0 ± 8.9 e	99.5 ± 0.5 b	188.7 ± 2.7 b	9.92 ± 0.8 a	7.4 ± 1.4 ab	235.5 ± 5.0 c	300.0 ± 3.4 b
	M2	900.0 ± 8.9 d	127.9 ± 2.4 c	287.0 ± 3.2 c	9.55 ± 0.5 a	7.9 ± 0.9 b	184.2 ± 10.5 b	382.6 ± 6.5 d
25	NM	863.3 ± 18.6 c	224.3 ± 2.8 c	275.33 ± 4.3 d	9.3 ± 0.7 a	7.4 ± 1.4 b	176.1 ± 1.9 b	328.8 ± 5.2 c
	M1	1060.0 ± 8.9 g	81.3 ± 1.1 d	124.19 ± 2.7 e	19.9 ± 1.7 c	16.0 ± 0.7 c	259.9 ± 4.3 cd	481.0 ± 4.9 f
	M2	1110.0 ± 17.9 h	122.7 ± 1.7 e	236.40 ± 5.6 g	24.9 ± 1.1 d	20.8 ± 0.7 d	279.3 ± 6.8 d	482.1 ± 7.0 f
50	NM	763.3 ± 5.2 b	150.6 ± 17.5 d	322.18 ± 3.0 g	9.8 ± 2.0 a	9.1 ± 0.4 b	382.6 ± 6.5 e	426.6 ± 5.8 e
	M1	1016.7 ± 27.3 f	247.7 ± 1.0 e	407.04 ± 5.5 h	21.8 ± 1.2 cd	16.7 ± 0.4 c	432.9 ± 11.0 f	512.3 ± 2.7 g
	M2	966.7 ± 5.2 e	99.4 ± 0.4 f	156.56 ± 0.9 i	45.9 ± 1.2 f	23.3 ± 0.9 de	550.6 ± 16.3 g	517.2 ± 7.5 g
100	NM	576.7 ± 5.2 a	148.5 ± 1.6 g	281.53 ± 0.5 f	13.7 ± 1.0 b	9.1 ± 0.5 b	403.3 ± 8.0 e	427.4 ± 6.4 e
	M1	980.0 ± 8.9 e	199.6 ± 0.3 h	350.91 ± 1.6 j	36.4 ± 1.2 e	25.1 ± 0.5 e	658.5 ± 8.5 h	760.2 ± 5.7 h
	M2	1126.7 ± 13.6 h	273.8 ± 0.8 i	441.11 ± 2.5 k	48.8 ± 1.5 f	35.1 ± 0.6 f	751.2 ± 14.0 i	936.3 ± 5.9 i