Literature DB >> 28642345

Evolution of nonspectral rhodopsin function at high altitudes.

Gianni M Castiglione1,2, Frances E Hauser2, Brian S Liao1, Nathan K Lujan2,3,4, Alexander Van Nynatten1, James M Morrow2, Ryan K Schott2, Nihar Bhattacharyya1, Sarah Z Dungan2, Belinda S W Chang5,2,6.   

Abstract

High-altitude environments present a range of biochemical and physiological challenges for organisms through decreases in oxygen, pressure, and temperature relative to lowland habitats. Protein-level adaptations to hypoxic high-altitude conditions have been identified in multiple terrestrial endotherms; however, comparable adaptations in aquatic ectotherms, such as fishes, have not been as extensively characterized. In enzyme proteins, cold adaptation is attained through functional trade-offs between stability and activity, often mediated by substitutions outside the active site. Little is known whether signaling proteins [e.g., G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)] exhibit natural variation in response to cold temperatures. Rhodopsin (RH1), the temperature-sensitive visual pigment mediating dim-light vision, offers an opportunity to enhance our understanding of thermal adaptation in a model GPCR. Here, we investigate the evolution of rhodopsin function in an Andean mountain catfish system spanning a range of elevations. Using molecular evolutionary analyses and site-directed mutagenesis experiments, we provide evidence for cold adaptation in RH1. We find that unique amino acid substitutions occur at sites under positive selection in high-altitude catfishes, located at opposite ends of the RH1 intramolecular hydrogen-bonding network. Natural high-altitude variants introduced into these sites via mutagenesis have limited effects on spectral tuning, yet decrease the stability of dark-state and light-activated rhodopsin, accelerating the decay of ligand-bound forms. As found in cold-adapted enzymes, this phenotype likely compensates for a cold-induced decrease in kinetic rates-properties of rhodopsin that mediate rod sensitivity and visual performance. Our results support a role for natural variation in enhancing the performance of GPCRs in response to cold temperatures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Andean catfishes; G protein-coupled receptor; in vitro expression; protein evolution; visual pigment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28642345      PMCID: PMC5514753          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705765114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  71 in total

1.  Statistical methods for testing functional divergence after gene duplication.

Authors:  X Gu
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Role of the conserved NPxxY(x)5,6F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation.

Authors:  Olaf Fritze; Sławomir Filipek; Vladimir Kuksa; Krzysztof Palczewski; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Oliver P Ernst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The retinal conformation and its environment in rhodopsin in light of a new 2.2 A crystal structure.

Authors:  Tetsuji Okada; Minoru Sugihara; Ana-Nicoleta Bondar; Marcus Elstner; Peter Entel; Volker Buss
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Role of the retinal hydrogen bond network in rhodopsin Schiff base stability and hydrolysis.

Authors:  Jay M Janz; David L Farrens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Effect of channel mutations on the uptake and release of the retinal ligand in opsin.

Authors:  Ronny Piechnick; Eglof Ritter; Peter W Hildebrand; Oliver P Ernst; Patrick Scheerer; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Martin Heck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The molecular mechanism of thermal noise in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Samer Gozem; Igor Schapiro; Nicolas Ferré; Massimo Olivucci
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  FUBAR: a fast, unconstrained bayesian approximation for inferring selection.

Authors:  Ben Murrell; Sasha Moola; Amandla Mabona; Thomas Weighill; Daniel Sheward; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Konrad Scheffler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Low retinal noise in animals with low body temperature allows high visual sensitivity.

Authors:  A C Aho; K Donner; C Hydén; L O Larsen; T Reuter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Rhodopsin activation: effects on the metarhodopsin I-metarhodopsin II equilibrium of neutralization or introduction of charged amino acids within putative transmembrane segments.

Authors:  C J Weitz; J Nathans
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-12-28       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  The molecular origin and evolution of dim-light vision in mammals.

Authors:  Constanze Bickelmann; James M Morrow; Jing Du; Ryan K Schott; Ilke van Hazel; Steve Lim; Johannes Müller; Belinda S W Chang
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  6 in total

1.  The role of ecological factors in shaping bat cone opsin evolution.

Authors:  Eduardo de A Gutierrez; Ryan K Schott; Matthew W Preston; Lívia O Loureiro; Burton K Lim; Belinda S W Chang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ancient whale rhodopsin reconstructs dim-light vision over a major evolutionary transition: Implications for ancestral diving behavior.

Authors:  Sarah Z Dungan; Belinda S W Chang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 3.  Targeting mitochondrial function and proteostasis to mitigate dynapenia.

Authors:  Karyn L Hamilton; Benjamin F Miller; Robert V Musci
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Convergent evolution of tertiary structure in rhodopsin visual proteins from vertebrates and box jellyfish.

Authors:  Elliot Gerrard; Eshita Mutt; Takashi Nagata; Mitsumasa Koyanagi; Tilman Flock; Elena Lesca; Gebhard F X Schertler; Akihisa Terakita; Xavier Deupi; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary analyses of visual opsin genes in frogs and toads: Diversity, duplication, and positive selection.

Authors:  Ryan K Schott; Leah Perez; Matthew A Kwiatkowski; Vance Imhoff; Jennifer M Gumm
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Functional trade-offs and environmental variation shaped ancient trajectories in the evolution of dim-light vision.

Authors:  Gianni M Castiglione; Belinda Sw Chang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.