Susumu Tao1, Luisa A Ciuffo2, Joao A C Lima3, Katherine C Wu4, Hiroshi Ashikaga5. 1. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: stao5@jhmi.edu. 2. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: lciuffo1@jhmi.edu. 3. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: jlima@jhmi.edu. 4. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: kwu@jhmi.edu. 5. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: hashika1@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Left atrial (LA) structure and function are important markers of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Tissue-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) accurately quantifies LA volume, strain, and strain rate based on biplane long-axis imaging. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the LA indices quantification from single-plane tissue-tracking CMR. METHODS: We included 388 subjects (mean age 57±13, male 70%) whose cine CMR images in sinus rhythm were available in both four-chamber and two-chamber views: 162 patients from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD) Study, 208 patients from atrial fibrillation cohort, and 18 healthy volunteers. The group was divided into the training set (n=291) and the test set (n=97). In the training set, we compared the LA indices derived from biplane imaging and single-plane imaging (a four-chamber view), and developed regression equations. In the test set, we used the regression equations to estimate the LA indices from the single-plane imaging, and quantified the accuracy of the estimation against the LA indices from the biplane. RESULTS: In the training set, all the LA indices from the single-plane imaging tended to be systematically underestimated compared with those from the biplane imaging, however, the correlation coefficient was high (r2=0.73-0.90, p<0.001). In the test set, LA volumetric indices showed excellent reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.91-0.92) with relatively low variability (16.3-22.3%); For LA strain and strain rate indices, reproducibility was excellent (ICC: 0.81-0.93), however, the variability was slightly higher than that of volumetric indices (21.7-25.4%). CONCLUSIONS: LA volumetric indices measured from single-plane tissue-tracking CMR are highly accurate and reproducible with reference to those derived from the standard biplane imaging. The reproducibility of LA strain and strain rate indices from single-plane tissue-tracking CMR is excellent but the variability is higher than that of the volumetric indices.
PURPOSE:Left atrial (LA) structure and function are important markers of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Tissue-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) accurately quantifies LA volume, strain, and strain rate based on biplane long-axis imaging. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the LA indices quantification from single-plane tissue-tracking CMR. METHODS: We included 388 subjects (mean age 57±13, male 70%) whose cine CMR images in sinus rhythm were available in both four-chamber and two-chamber views: 162 patients from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD) Study, 208 patients from atrial fibrillation cohort, and 18 healthy volunteers. The group was divided into the training set (n=291) and the test set (n=97). In the training set, we compared the LA indices derived from biplane imaging and single-plane imaging (a four-chamber view), and developed regression equations. In the test set, we used the regression equations to estimate the LA indices from the single-plane imaging, and quantified the accuracy of the estimation against the LA indices from the biplane. RESULTS: In the training set, all the LA indices from the single-plane imaging tended to be systematically underestimated compared with those from the biplane imaging, however, the correlation coefficient was high (r2=0.73-0.90, p<0.001). In the test set, LA volumetric indices showed excellent reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.91-0.92) with relatively low variability (16.3-22.3%); For LA strain and strain rate indices, reproducibility was excellent (ICC: 0.81-0.93), however, the variability was slightly higher than that of volumetric indices (21.7-25.4%). CONCLUSIONS: LA volumetric indices measured from single-plane tissue-tracking CMR are highly accurate and reproducible with reference to those derived from the standard biplane imaging. The reproducibility of LA strain and strain rate indices from single-plane tissue-tracking CMR is excellent but the variability is higher than that of the volumetric indices.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Cesare Russo; Rebecca T Hahn; Zhezhen Jin; Shunichi Homma; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Teresa S M Tsang; Bernard J Gersh; Christopher P Appleton; A Jamil Tajik; Marion E Barnes; Kent R Bailey; Jae K Oh; Cynthia Leibson; Samantha C Montgomery; James B Seward Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-11-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: B M Psaty; T A Manolio; L H Kuller; R A Kronmal; M Cushman; L P Fried; R White; C D Furberg; P M Rautaharju Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-10-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christine C Welles; Ivy A Ku; Damon M Kwan; Mary A Whooley; Nelson B Schiller; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Fay Y Lin; Richard B Devereux; Mary J Roman; Joyce Meng; Veronica M Jow; Avrum Jacobs; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Tracy Q Callister; James K Min Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-11
Authors: Luc Christiaens; Benoît Lequeux; Paul Ardilouze; Stephanie Ragot; Jean Mergy; Daniel Herpin; Benjamin Bonnet; Joseph Allal Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2008-01-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Mytra Zareian; Luisa Ciuffo; Mohammadali Habibi; Anders Opdahl; Elzbieta H Chamera; Colin O Wu; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima; Bharath Ambale Venkatesh Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Katherine C Wu; Shannon Wongvibulsin; Susumu Tao; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Michael Stillabower; Timm M Dickfeld; Joseph E Marine; Robert G Weiss; Gordon F Tomaselli; Scott L Zeger Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 5.501