Literature DB >> 28640391

Selective sweeps of mitochondrial DNA can drive the evolution of uniparental inheritance.

Joshua R Christie1,2, Madeleine Beekman1.   

Abstract

Although the uniparental (or maternal) inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is widespread, the reasons for its evolution remain unclear. Two main hypotheses have been proposed: selection against individuals containing different mtDNAs (heteroplasmy) and selection against "selfish" mtDNA mutations. Recently, uniparental inheritance was shown to promote adaptive evolution in mtDNA, potentially providing a third hypothesis for its evolution. Here, we explore this hypothesis theoretically and ask if the accumulation of beneficial mutations provides a sufficient fitness advantage for uniparental inheritance to invade a population in which mtDNA is inherited biparentally. In a deterministic model, uniparental inheritance increases in frequency but cannot replace biparental inheritance if only a single beneficial mtDNA mutation sweeps through the population. When we allow successive selective sweeps of mtDNA, however, uniparental inheritance can replace biparental inheritance. Using a stochastic model, we show that a combination of selection and drift facilitates the fixation of uniparental inheritance (compared to a neutral trait) when there is only a single selective mtDNA sweep. When we consider multiple mtDNA sweeps in a stochastic model, uniparental inheritance becomes even more likely to replace biparental inheritance. Our findings thus suggest that selective sweeps of beneficial mtDNA haplotypes can drive the evolution of uniparental inheritance.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Adaptation; adaptive evolution; cytoplasmic genomes; maternal inheritance; mitonuclear coadaptation; selfish mitochondria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640391     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Mitigating Mitochondrial Genome Erosion Without Recombination.

Authors:  Arunas L Radzvilavicius; Hanna Kokko; Joshua R Christie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sorting of mitochondrial and plastid heteroplasmy in Arabidopsis is extremely rapid and depends on MSH1 activity.

Authors:  Amanda K Broz; Alexandra Keene; Matheus Fernandes Gyorfy; Mychaela Hodous; Iain G Johnston; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 3.  Inheritance through the cytoplasm.

Authors:  M Florencia Camus; Bridie Alexander-Lawrie; Joel Sharbrough; Gregory D D Hurst
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.832

4.  Evolution of asymmetric gamete signaling and suppressed recombination at the mating type locus.

Authors:  Zena Hadjivasiliou; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Host-Parasite Interaction in Sarcoptes scabiei Infestation in Porcine Model with a Preliminary Note on Its Genetic Lineage from India.

Authors:  Arun Kumar De; Sneha Sawhney; Samiran Mondal; Perumal Ponraj; Sanjay Kumar Ravi; Gopal Sarkar; Santanu Banik; Dhruba Malakar; Kangayan Muniswamy; Ashish Kumar; Arvind Kumar Tripathi; Asit Kumar Bera; Debasis Bhattacharya
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Deletion of the sex-determining gene SXI1α enhances the spread of mitochondrial introns in Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Zhun Yan; Zhimin Li; Li Yan; Yongting Yu; Yi Cheng; Jia Chen; Yunyun Liu; Chunsheng Gao; Liangbin Zeng; Xiangping Sun; Litao Guo; Jianping Xu
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2018-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.