Literature DB >> 28893855

Mitigating Mitochondrial Genome Erosion Without Recombination.

Arunas L Radzvilavicius1,2, Hanna Kokko3, Joshua R Christie3.   

Abstract

Mitochondria are ATP-producing organelles of bacterial ancestry that played a key role in the origin and early evolution of complex eukaryotic cells. Most modern eukaryotes transmit mitochondrial genes uniparentally, often without recombination among genetically divergent organelles. While this asymmetric inheritance maintains the efficacy of purifying selection at the level of the cell, the absence of recombination could also make the genome susceptible to Muller's ratchet. How mitochondria escape this irreversible defect accumulation is a fundamental unsolved question. Occasional paternal leakage could in principle promote recombination, but it would also compromise the purifying selection benefits of uniparental inheritance. We assess this tradeoff using a stochastic population-genetic model. In the absence of recombination, uniparental inheritance of freely-segregating genomes mitigates mutational erosion, while paternal leakage exacerbates the ratchet effect. Mitochondrial fusion-fission cycles ensure independent genome segregation, improving purifying selection. Paternal leakage provides opportunity for recombination to slow down the mutation accumulation, but always at a cost of increased steady-state mutation load. Our findings indicate that random segregation of mitochondrial genomes under uniparental inheritance can effectively combat the mutational meltdown, and that homologous recombination under paternal leakage might not be needed.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  Muller’s ratchet; maternal inheritance; mitochondrial recombination; paternal leakage; uniparental inheritance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28893855      PMCID: PMC5676227          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  56 in total

Review 1.  Why have organelles retained genomes?

Authors:  H L Race; R G Herrmann; W Martin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Selection for mitonuclear co-adaptation could favour the evolution of two sexes.

Authors:  Zena Hadjivasiliou; Andrew Pomiankowski; Robert M Seymour; Nick Lane
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Paternal leakage sustains the cytoplasmic polymorphism underlying gynodioecy but remains invasible by nuclear restorers.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; David E McCauley
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The mitochondrial DNA genetic bottleneck results from replication of a subpopulation of genomes.

Authors:  Timothy Wai; Daniella Teoli; Eric A Shoubridge
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  The causes of mutation accumulation in mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Maurine Neiman; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: how much, what happens, and Why?

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole.

Authors:  Gordon M Bennett; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The evolution of sex: A new hypothesis based on mitochondrial mutational erosion: Mitochondrial mutational erosion in ancestral eukaryotes would favor the evolution of sex, harnessing nuclear recombination to optimize compensatory nuclear coadaptation.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Matthew D Hall; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Similar Efficacies of Selection Shape Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes in Both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Chad R Burrus; Chao Ji; Matthew W Hahn; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 10.  Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally?

Authors:  Stephan Greiner; Johanna Sobanski; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.345

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sex and Mitonuclear Adaptation in Experimental Caenorhabditis elegans Populations.

Authors:  Riana I Wernick; Stephen F Christy; Dana K Howe; Jennifer A Sullins; Joseph F Ramirez; Maura Sare; McKenna J Penley; Levi T Morran; Dee R Denver; Suzanne Estes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sorting of mitochondrial and plastid heteroplasmy in Arabidopsis is extremely rapid and depends on MSH1 activity.

Authors:  Amanda K Broz; Alexandra Keene; Matheus Fernandes Gyorfy; Mychaela Hodous; Iain G Johnston; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 3.  Evolving mtDNA populations within cells.

Authors:  Iain G Johnston; Joerg P Burgstaller
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  Selective constraints in cold-region wild boars may defuse the effects of small effective population size on molecular evolution of mitogenomes.

Authors:  Jianhai Chen; Pan Ni; Thuy Nhien Tran Thi; Evgeniy Varisovich Kamaldinov; Valeriy Lavrentyevich Petukhov; Jianlin Han; Xiangdong Liu; Nikica Šprem; Shuhong Zhao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Selection for biparental inheritance of mitochondria under hybridization and mitonuclear fitness interactions.

Authors:  Tom M Allison; Arunas L Radzvilavicius; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.