Literature DB >> 28640060

Individualized Estimation of Physical Activity in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Whitney A Welch1, Neil B Alexander, Ann M Swartz, Nora E Miller, Erica Twardzik, Scott J Strath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Compare physical activity intensity in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using individualized, relative cutpoints with standard, absolute cutpoints.
METHODS: One hundred older adults with T2DM (68.9 ± 5.1 yr, 65% male, 32.7 ± 6.3 kg·m, 7.2% ± 1.1% glycosylated hemoglobin) completed a two-speed walking protocol (varying, walking between 1 and 2.5 mph), followed by a modified Bruce peak exercise test. Participants wore an accelerometer-based physical activity monitor at their waist, and oxygen consumption was measured. Afterward, participants wore the activity monitor for seven consecutive days. Linear equations for each individual were derived from the activity counts and energy expenditure measured during the walking protocol. Relative intensity cutpoints were calculated by using standard classifications of 44% oxygen consumption (V˙O2)peak to determine moderate and 59% V˙O2peak to determine vigorous intensity. Average time spent in intensity categories per day were calculated using relative and absolute (moderate, 2020 counts per minute; vigorous, 5999 counts per minute) cutpoints. t-Tests were run to compare estimated time spent in intensity category by cutpoint.
RESULTS: Mean V˙O2peak was 17.9 ± 4.5 mL·kg·min and relative cutpoints were, on average, 1033.5 counts per minute (SD, 741.2 counts per minute) for moderate and 2211.7 counts per minute (SD, 1512.4) for vigorous activity. Using the relative cutpoints, participants accumulated an average of 157.2 min (SD, 73.7 min) of light, 33.3 min (SD, 35.6 min) of moderate, and 15.6 min (SD, 26.7 min) of vigorous activity per day. Use of the absolute cutpoint resulted in significantly different estimations based on intensity category: light, 200.7 min (SD, 74.7 min; P < 0.05); moderate, 7.1 min (SD, 9.2 min; P < 0.05); and vigorous, 0.006 min (SD, 0.04 min; P < 0.05) of activity per day.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest utilization of absolute cutpoints may underestimate daily relative intensity levels of physical activity in older adults with T2DM. This misclassification may improperly inform dose-response relationships and population-based prevalence of physical activity in these and may extend to other clinically important populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640060      PMCID: PMC5645223          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  14 in total

1.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system.

Authors:  J E McLaughlin; G A King; E T Howley; D R Bassett; B E Ainsworth
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Self-reported and objectively measured activity related to biomarkers using NHANES.

Authors:  Audie A Atienza; Richard P Moser; Frank Perna; Kevin Dodd; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults.

Authors:  Nora E Miller; Scott J Strath; Ann M Swartz; Susan E Cashin
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Congruent validity and reliability of two metabolic systems to measure resting metabolic rate.

Authors:  W A Welch; S J Strath; A M Swartz
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Evidence to support including lifestyle light-intensity recommendations in physical activity guidelines for older adults.

Authors:  Paul D Loprinzi; Hyo Lee; Bradley J Cardinal
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2014-02-27

6.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Oxygen-uptake (VO2) kinetics and functional mobility performance in impaired older adults.

Authors:  Neil B Alexander; Donald R Dengel; Rebecca J Olson; Katheryn M Krajewski
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Estimating relative intensity using individualized accelerometer cutpoints: the importance of fitness level.

Authors:  Cemal Ozemek; Heather L Cochran; Scott J Strath; Wonwoo Byun; Leonard A Kaminsky
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear time and physical activity level of a large cohort study.

Authors:  Sarah Kozey Keadle; Eric J Shiroma; Patty S Freedson; I-Min Lee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities--United States, 2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  Physical activity patterns and multimorbidity burden of older adults with different levels of functional status: NHANES 2003-2006.

Authors:  Jeremy A Steeves; Eric J Shiroma; Scott A Conger; Dane Van Domelen; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.554

2.  The Physical Activity Assessment of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Accelerometer-Based Cut Points: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ioana A Moldovan; Alexa Bragg; Anna S Nidhiry; Barbara A De La Cruz; Suzanne E Mitchell
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2022-09-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.