Literature DB >> 28640021

Identifying Distinct Subgroups of ICU Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.

Kelly C Vranas1, Jeffrey K Jopling, Timothy E Sweeney, Meghan C Ramsey, Arnold S Milstein, Christopher G Slatore, Gabriel J Escobar, Vincent X Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Identifying subgroups of ICU patients with similar clinical needs and trajectories may provide a framework for more efficient ICU care through the design of care platforms tailored around patients' shared needs. However, objective methods for identifying these ICU patient subgroups are lacking. We used a machine learning approach to empirically identify ICU patient subgroups through clustering analysis and evaluate whether these groups might represent appropriate targets for care redesign efforts.
DESIGN: We performed clustering analysis using data from patients' hospital stays to retrospectively identify patient subgroups from a large, heterogeneous ICU population.
SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a healthcare delivery system serving 3.9 million members. PATIENTS: ICU patients 18 years old or older with an ICU admission between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012, at one of 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used clustering analysis to identify putative clusters among 5,000 patients randomly selected from 24,884 ICU patients. To assess cluster validity, we evaluated the distribution and frequency of patient characteristics and the need for invasive therapies. We then applied a classifier built from the sample cohort to the remaining 19,884 patients to compare the derivation and validation clusters. Clustering analysis successfully identified six clinically recognizable subgroups that differed significantly in all baseline characteristics and clinical trajectories, despite sharing common diagnoses. In the validation cohort, the proportion of patients assigned to each cluster was similar and demonstrated significant differences across clusters for all variables.
CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning approach revealed important differences between empirically derived subgroups of ICU patients that are not typically revealed by admitting diagnosis or severity of illness alone. Similar data-driven approaches may provide a framework for future organizational innovations in ICU care tailored around patients' shared needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640021      PMCID: PMC5600667          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  34 in total

1.  The Kaiser Permanente inpatient risk adjustment methodology was valid in an external patient population.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Gabriel J Escobar; John D Greene; Alan J Forster
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Care platforms: a basic building block for care delivery.

Authors:  Richard M J Bohmer; David M Lawrence
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians.

Authors:  Ruth D Piers; Elie Azoulay; Bara Ricou; Freda Dekeyser Ganz; Johan Decruyenaere; Adeline Max; Andrej Michalsen; Paulo Azevedo Maia; Radoslaw Owczuk; Francesca Rubulotta; Pieter Depuydt; Anne-Pascale Meert; Anna K Reyners; Andrew Aquilina; Maarten Bekaert; Nele J Van den Noortgate; Wim J Schrauwen; Dominique D Benoit
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  M N Diringer; D F Edwards
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Expanding a performance improvement initiative in critical care from hospital to system.

Authors:  Yosef D Dlugacz; Lori Stier; Dana Lustbader; Mitchel C Jacobs; Erfan Hussain; Alice Greenwood
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2002-08

6.  Risk-adjusting hospital inpatient mortality using automated inpatient, outpatient, and laboratory databases.

Authors:  Gabriel J Escobar; John D Greene; Peter Scheirer; Marla N Gardner; David Draper; Patricia Kipnis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Cluster analysis and clinical asthma phenotypes.

Authors:  Pranab Haldar; Ian D Pavord; Ruth H Green; Dominic E Shaw; Michael A Berry; Michael Thomas; Christopher E Brightling; Andrew J Wardlaw
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  A model for identifying patients who may not need intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  Jack E Zimmerman; Andrew A Kramer
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.425

9.  Inappropriate care in European ICUs: confronting views from nurses and junior and senior physicians.

Authors:  Ruth D Piers; Elie Azoulay; Bara Ricou; Freda DeKeyser Ganz; Adeline Max; Andrej Michalsen; Paulo Azevedo Maia; Radoslaw Owczuk; Francesca Rubulotta; Anne-Pascale Meert; Anna K Reyners; Johan Decruyenaere; Dominique D Benoit
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults.

Authors:  Neill K J Adhikari; Robert A Fowler; Satish Bhagwanjee; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  16 in total

1.  The use of clustering algorithms in critical care research to unravel patient heterogeneity.

Authors:  José Castela Forte; Anders Perner; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Big Data and Data Science in Critical Care.

Authors:  L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto; Yuan Luo; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Allergic Immune Diseases and the Risk of Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Infection.

Authors:  Philip A Verhoef; Sivasubramanium V Bhavani; Kyle A Carey; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  A Standardized Multimodal Neurological Monitoring Protocol-Guided Cerebral Protection Therapy for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Supported Patients.

Authors:  Xiaobei Shi; Qiao Gu; Yiwei Li; Mengyuan Diao; Xin Wen; Wei Hu; Shaosong Xi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  Three Data-Driven Phenotypes of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Preserved from Early Childhood to Middle Adulthood.

Authors:  Jiancheng Ye; L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

6.  Identifying and characterizing high-risk clusters in a heterogeneous ICU population with deep embedded clustering.

Authors:  José Castela Forte; Galiya Yeshmagambetova; Maureen L van der Grinten; Bart Hiemstra; Thomas Kaufmann; Ruben J Eck; Frederik Keus; Anne H Epema; Marco A Wiering; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  More than one in three proxies do not know their loved one's current code status: An observational study in a Maryland ICU.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Caroline M Chessare; Rachel K Coffin; Dale M Needham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Towards a decision support tool for intensive care discharge: machine learning algorithm development using electronic healthcare data from MIMIC-III and Bristol, UK.

Authors:  Christopher J McWilliams; Daniel J Lawson; Raul Santos-Rodriguez; Iain D Gilchrist; Alan Champneys; Timothy H Gould; Mathew Jc Thomas; Christopher P Bourdeaux
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Identification and Prediction of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Intensive Care Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Zhu Zhu; Nan Su; Jun Wang; Jun Gu; Shu Lu; Li Zhang; Xuesong Chen; Lei Xu; Xiangrong Shao; Jiangtao Yin; Jinghui Yang; Baodi Sun; Yongsheng Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 10.  New perspectives to improve critical care benchmarking.

Authors:  Jorge I F Salluh; Jean Daniel Chiche; Carlos Eduardo Reis; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.