Literature DB >> 22203538

Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians.

Ruth D Piers1, Elie Azoulay, Bara Ricou, Freda Dekeyser Ganz, Johan Decruyenaere, Adeline Max, Andrej Michalsen, Paulo Azevedo Maia, Radoslaw Owczuk, Francesca Rubulotta, Pieter Depuydt, Anne-Pascale Meert, Anna K Reyners, Andrew Aquilina, Maarten Bekaert, Nele J Van den Noortgate, Wim J Schrauwen, Dominique D Benoit.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Clinicians in intensive care units (ICUs) who perceive the care they provide as inappropriate experience moral distress and are at risk for burnout. This situation may jeopardize patient quality of care and increase staff turnover.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of perceived inappropriateness of care among ICU clinicians and to identify patient-related situations, personal characteristics, and work-related characteristics associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional evaluation on May 11, 2010, of 82 adult ICUs in 9 European countries and Israel. Participants were 1953 ICU nurses and physicians providing bedside care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perceived inappropriateness of care, defined as a specific patient-care situation in which the clinician acts in a manner contrary to his or her personal and professional beliefs, as assessed using a questionnaire designed for the study.
RESULTS: Of 1651 respondents (median response rate, 93% overall; interquartile range, 82%-100% [medians 93% among nurses and 100% among physicians]), perceived inappropriateness of care in at least 1 patient was reported by 439 clinicians overall (27%; 95% CI, 24%-29%), 300 of 1218 were nurses (25%), 132 of 407 were physicians (32%), and 26 had missing answers describing job title. Of these 439 individuals, 397 reported 445 situations associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. The most common reports were perceived disproportionate care (290 situations [65%; 95% CI, 58%-73%], of which "too much care" was reported in 89% of situations, followed by "other patients would benefit more" (168 situations [38%; 95% CI, 32%-43%]). Independently associated with perceived inappropriateness of care rates both among nurses and physicians were symptom control decisions directed by physicians only (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.56; P = .006); involvement of nurses in end-of-life decision making (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; P = .02); good collaboration between nurses and physicians (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .009); and freedom to decide how to perform work-related tasks (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P = .002); while a high perceived workload was significantly associated among nurses only (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P = .02). Perceived inappropriateness of care was independently associated with higher intent to leave a job (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.63; P = .03). In the subset of 69 ICUs for which patient data could be linked, clinicians reported received inappropriateness of care in 207 patients, representing 23% (95% CI, 20%-27%) of 883 ICU beds.
CONCLUSION: Among a group of European and Israeli ICU clinicians, perceptions of inappropriate care were frequently reported and were inversely associated with factors indicating good teamwork.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22203538     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  85 in total

1.  Perceptions of appropriateness of care in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Christine Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe.

Authors:  A Rhodes; P Ferdinande; H Flaatten; B Guidet; P G Metnitz; R P Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  How should clinicians respond to requests for potentially inappropriate treatment?

Authors:  Gabriel T Bosslet; Jozef Kesecioglu; Douglas B White
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Moral distress reexamined: a feminist interpretation of nurses' identities, relationships, and responsibilites.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peter; Joan Liaschenko
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  [Clinical everyday ethics-support in handling moral distress? : Evaluation of an ethical decision-making model for interprofessional clinical teams].

Authors:  S Tanner; H Albisser Schleger; B Meyer-Zehnder; V Schnurrer; S Reiter-Theil; H Pargger
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 6.  Integration of palliative care in the context of rapid response: a report from the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU advisory board.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Kusum S Mathews; David E Weissman; Karen J Brasel; Margaret Campbell; J Randall Curtis; Jennifer A Frontera; Michelle Gabriel; Ross M Hays; Anne C Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen A Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Stefanie P Weiss; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Dana R Lustbader
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  [Legal implications of overtreatment].

Authors:  G Duttge
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 0.840

8.  [Non-beneficial therapy and emotional exhaustion in end-of-life care : Results of a survey among intensive care unit personnel].

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; F Hoffmann; A Mikolajetz; S Schröder; A Michalsen; K Dey; R Riessen; U Jaschinski; M Weiss; M Ragaller; S Bercker; J Briegel; C Spies; D Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment and Limiting Overtreatment at the End of Life.

Authors:  Robert D Truog; Terri R Fried
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Change in inappropriate critical care over time.

Authors:  Thanh H Neville; Joshua F Wiley; Miramar Kardouh; J Randall Curtis; Myrtle C Yamamoto; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.