Literature DB >> 28639943

A bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering.

Tuğrul Tolga Demirtaş1, Gülseren Irmak, Menemşe Gümüşderelioğlu.   

Abstract

Bioprinting can be defined as 3D patterning of living cells and other biologics by filling and assembling them using a computer-aided layer-by-layer deposition approach to fabricate living tissue and organ analogs for tissue engineering. The presence of cells within the ink to use a 'bio-ink' presents the potential to print 3D structures that can be implanted or printed into damaged/diseased bone tissue to promote highly controlled cell-based regeneration and remineralization of bone. In this study, it was shown for the first time that chitosan solution and its composite with nanostructured bone-like hydroxyapatite (HA) can be mixed with cells and printed successfully. MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cell laden chitosan and chitosan-HA hydrogels, which were printed with the use of an extruder-based bioprinter, were characterized by comparing these hydrogels to alginate and alginate-HA hydrogels. Rheological analysis showed that all groups had viscoelastic properties. It was also shown that under simulated physiological conditions, chitosan and chitosan-HA hydrogels were stable. Also, the viscosity values of the bio-solutions were in an applicable range to be used in 3D bio-printers. Cell viability and proliferation analyses documented that after printing with bio-solutions, cells continued to be viable in all groups. It was observed that cells printed within chitosan-HA composite hydrogel had peak expression levels for early and late stages osteogenic markers. It was concluded that cells within chitosan and chitosan-HA hydrogels had mineralized and differentiated osteogenically after 21 days of culture. It was also discovered that chitosan is superior to alginate, which is the most widely used solution preferred in bioprinting systems, in terms of cell proliferation and differentiation. Thus, applicability and printability of chitosan as a bio-printing solution were clearly demonstrated. Furthermore, it was proven that the presence of bone-like nanostructured HA in alginate and chitosan hydrogels improved cell viability, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28639943     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa7b1d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  45 in total

1.  Rational design of hydrogels to enhance osteogenic potential.

Authors:  Soyon Kim; Min Lee
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.811

2.  Synthesis and characterization of osteoinductive visible light-activated adhesive composites with antimicrobial properties.

Authors:  Amirhossein Moghanian; Roberto Portillo-Lara; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; Hailey Konisky; Seyed Hossein Bassir; Nasim Annabi
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Extracellular Matrix/Amorphous Magnesium Phosphate Bioink for 3D Bioprinting of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Nileshkumar Dubey; Jessica A Ferreira; Jos Malda; Sarit B Bhaduri; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 4.  From injectable to 3D printed hydrogels in maxillofacial tissue engineering: A review.

Authors:  Divya Mehrotra; Ruby Dwivedi; Deepti Nandana; R K Singh
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-09-21

5.  Enhanced bone tissue regeneration with hydrogel-based scaffolds by embedding parathyroid hormone in mesoporous bioactive glass.

Authors:  Mariane Beatriz Sordi; Márcio Celso Fredel; Ariadne Cristiane Cabral da Cruz; Paul Thomas Sharpe; Ricardo de Souza Magini
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  3D printing applications in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Abid Haleem; Mohd Javaid; Rizwan Hasan Khan; Rajiv Suman
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-14

Review 7.  Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  Tyler Potyondy; Jorge Alfredo Uquillas; Peyton J Tebon; Batzaya Byambaa; Anwarul Hasan; Maryam Tavafoghi; Heloise Mary; George E Aninwene; Ippokratis Pountos; Ali Khademhosseini; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 8.  3D bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Sharda Gupta; Arindam Bit
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 9.  Emulating Human Tissues and Organs: A Bioprinting Perspective Toward Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ana Clotilde Fonseca; Ferry P W Melchels; Miguel J S Ferreira; Samuel R Moxon; Geoffrey Potjewyd; Tim R Dargaville; Susan J Kimber; Marco Domingos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels.

Authors:  Amin GhavamiNejad; Nureddin Ashammakhi; Xiao Yu Wu; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 13.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.