Literature DB >> 28639942

Commissioning of the tongue-and-groove modelling in treatment planning systems: from static fields to VMAT treatments.

Victor Hernandez1, Juan Antonio Vera-Sánchez, Laure Vieillevigne, Jordi Saez.   

Abstract

Adequate modelling of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) by treatment planning systems (TPS) is essential for accurate dose calculations in intensity-modulated radiation-therapy. For this reason modern TPSs incorporate MLC characteristics such as the leaf end curvature, MLC transmission and the tongue-and-groove. However, the modelling of the tongue-and-groove is often neglected during TPS commissioning and it is not known how accurate it is. This study evaluates the dosimetric consequences of the tongue-and-groove effect for two different MLC models using both film dosimetry and ionisation chambers. A set of comprehensive tests are presented that evaluate the ability of TPSs to accurately model this effect in (a) static fields, (b) sliding window beams and (c) VMAT arcs. The tests proposed are useful for the commissioning of TPSs and for the validation of major upgrades. With the ECLIPSE TPS, relevant differences were found between calculations and measurements for beams with dynamic MLCs in the presence of the TG effect, especially for the High Definition MLC, small gap sizes and the 1 mm calculation grid. For this combination, dose differences as high as 10% and 7% were obtained for dynamic MLC gaps of 5 mm and 10 mm, respectively. These differences indicate inadequate modelling of the tongue-and-groove effect, which might not be identified without the proposed tests. In particular, the TPS tended to underestimate the calculated dose, which may require tuning of other configuration parameters in the TPS (such as the dosimetric leaf gap) in order to maximise the agreement between calculations and measurements in clinical plans. In conclusion, a need for better modelling of the MLC by TPSs is demonstrated, one of the relevant aspects being the tongue-and-groove effect. This would improve the accuracy of TPS calculations, especially for plans using small MLC gaps, such as plans with small target volumes or high complexities. Improved modelling of the MLC would also reduce the need for tuning parameters in the TPS, facilitating a more comprehensive configuration and commissioning of TPSs.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28639942     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7b1a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Reference dataset of users' photon beam modeling parameters for the Eclipse, Pinnacle, and RayStation treatment planning systems.

Authors:  Mallory C Glenn; Christine B Peterson; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Julianne M Pollard-Larkin; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Model refinement increases confidence levels and clinical agreement when commissioning a three-dimensional secondary dose calculation system.

Authors:  Brian Bismack; Jennifer Dolan; Eric Laugeman; Anant Gopal; Ning Wen; Indrin Chetty
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.243

3.  MLC parameters from static fields to VMAT plans: an evaluation in a RT-dedicated MC environment (PRIMO).

Authors:  Lucia Paganini; Giacomo Reggiori; Antonella Stravato; Valentina Palumbo; Pietro Mancosu; Francesca Lobefalo; Anna Gaudino; Antonella Fogliata; Marta Scorsetti; Stefano Tomatis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.