| Literature DB >> 28638888 |
Omotayo B Ilesanmi1,2, Afolabi C Akinmoladun1, Olanrewaju Sam Olayeriju1, Ibrahim Olabayode Saliu1, M Tolulope Olaleye1, Afolabi A Akindahunsi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays a significant role in stroke pathogenesis. Hence, plants rich in antioxidant phytochemicals have been suggested as effective remedies for prevention and treatment of stroke and other neurological diseases. Antiaris africana Engl. (Moraceae) is traditionally used for the management of brain-related problems but there is paucity of data on its anti-stroke potential.Entities:
Keywords: brain ischemia; excitotoxicity; neuroprotection; oxidative stress; phytochemicals; stroke
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28638888 PMCID: PMC5471473 DOI: 10.21010/ajtcam.v14i4.28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med ISSN: 2505-0044
Figure 1Effect of methanol extract of Antiaris africana (MEA) on Glutamine synthetase activity in the brain following bilateral common carotid artery occlusion/reperfusion (BCCAO/R) in rats. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. Group I: Sham-operated; Group II: BCCAO/R; Group III: MEA (50 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group IV: MEA (100 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group V: (quercetin (20 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R. ***significantly different from sham (p<0.001), ### significantly different from BCCAO/R (p<0.001).
Figure 2Na+/K+ ATPase activity in rat brain subjected to bilateral common carotid artery occlusion/reperfusion (BCCAO/R) and pretreated with methanol extract of Antiaris africana (MEA). Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. Group I: Sham-operated; Group II: BCCAO/R; Group III: MEA (50 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group IV: MEA (100 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group V: quercetin (20 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R. ***significantly different from sham (p<0.001), ### significantly different from BCCAO/R (p<0.001).
Effect of MEA on xanthine oxidase and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities in the brain following BCCAO/R
| Group | Xanthine Oxidase (nmol of uric acid formed/min/mg protein) | MPO (units/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.08±0.01 | 0.011±0.003 | |
| 0.16±0.01 | 0.036±0.01 | |
| 0.10±0.01[ | 0.025±0.003[ | |
| 0.06±0.01[ | 0.022±0.002[ | |
| 0.08±0.01[ | 0.033±0.004[ |
Results are expressed as mean ± S.D (n=8).
p<0.001 versus Sham;
p<0.05 versus BCCAO/R;
p<0.001 versus BCCAO/R.
Figure 3Effect of methanol extract of Antiaris africana (MEA) on tyrosine hydroxylase activity in the brain of rats following bilateral common carotid artery occlusion/reperfusion (BCCAO/R). Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. Group I: Sham-operated; Group II: BCCAO/R; Group III: MEA (50 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group IV: MEA (100 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group V: quercetin (20 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R.
***significantly different from sham (p<0.001), ### significantly different from BCCAO/R (p<0.001).
Figure 4Acetylcholinesterase activity in the brain of rats pretreated with methanol extract of Antiaris africana (MEA) and then submitted to bilateral common carotid artery occlusion/reperfusion (BCCAO/R). Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. Group I: Sham-operated; Group II: BCCAO/R; Group III: MEA (50 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group IV: MEA (100 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R; Group V: quercetin (20 mg/kg) + BCCAO/R. ***significantly different from sham (p<0.001), ### significantly different from BCCAO/R (p<0.001).
Effect of methanol extract of Antiaris africana (MEA) on reduced glutathione (GSH) and lipid peroxidation (MDA) in the brain following BCCAO/R in rats.
| Group | GSH (mmol/g protein) | MDA (µmol TBARS/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2±0.2 | 0.072±0.009 | |
| 0.6±0.1 | 0.145±0.011 | |
| 0.7±0.1[ | 0.135±0.028[ | |
| 1.7±0.4[ | 0.098±0.004[ | |
| 1.6±0.1[ | 0.079±0.012[ |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n=8).
p<0.001 versus Sham;
p<0.05 versus BCCAO/R;
p<0.01 versus BCCAO/R;
p<0.001 versus BCCAO/R.
Effect of methanol extract of Antiaris africana (MEA) on antioxidant enzymes in the brain following BCCAO/Rin rats.
| Group | GPx (µmoles GSH consumed/min/mg protein) | Catalase (Kat.f) | SOD (units/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.971±0.255 | 0.232±0.015 | 0.0989±0.008 | |
| 11.712±0.394 | 0.192±0.009 | 0.0443±0.001 | |
| 14.910±1.631[ | 0.234±0.024[ | 0.064±0.015[ | |
| 12.893±0.171[ | 0.207±0.012[ | 0.0071±0.005[ | |
| 12.199±0.546[ | 0.193±0.007[ | 0.0674±0.008[ |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n=8).
p<0.001 versus Sham;
p<0.05 versus Sham;
p<0.05 versus BCCAO/R;
p<0.01 versus BCCAO/R;
p<0.001 versus BCCAO/R.