| Literature DB >> 28638274 |
Hung-Lung Ke1,2,3, Wei-Ming Li1,2,3,4, Hui-Hui Lin2,3, Wei-Chi Hsu1,2,3, Ya-Ling Hsu1, Lin-Li Chang1,5, Chun-Nung Huang1,2,3, Ching-Chia Li2,3,6, Hsin-Ping Chang2,3, Hsin-Chih Yeh1,2,3, Chien-Feng Li7,8,9, Wen-Jeng Wu1,2,3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypoxia has been shown to facilitate tumor progression. Hypoxia-regulated microRNA-210 (miR-210) may play an important role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. In this study, we evaluated the clinical significance of miR-210 expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).Entities:
Keywords: HIF-1α; Upper tract urothelial carcinoma; miR-210.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28638274 PMCID: PMC5479127 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.15699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Relationship between miR-210 expression and clinicopathologic features in UTUC patients.
| Clinicopathologic feature | n | MiR-210 relevant expression(2-ΔCt) | HIF-1α relevant expression(2-ΔCt) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (25%~75%) | Mean ± standard deviation | |||||
| Tissue | UTUC | 50 | 0.176 (0.104~0.442) | <0.001 | 0.053 ± 0.043 | 0.014 |
| Non-cancerous urothelium | 50 | 0.020 (0.008~0.059) | 0.029 ± 0.046 | |||
| Gender | Male | 35 | 0.138 (0.043~0.387) | 0.181 | 0.057 ± 0.053 | 0.078 |
| Female | 48 | 0.181 (0.094~0.326) | 0.040 ± 0.035 | |||
| Age | < 70 | 42 | 0.153 (0.070~0.396) | 0.639 | 0.048 ± 0.042 | 0.885 |
| ≥ 70 | 41 | 0.163 (0.064~0.286) | 0.046 ± 0.046 | |||
| Stage | Organ-confined (T1-2) | 50 | 0.151 (0.056~0.259) | 0.020 | 0.037 ± 0.041 | 0.015 |
| Locally advanced (T3-4) | 33 | 0.257 (0.106~0.467) | 0.061 ± 0.045 | |||
| Grade | Low | 11 | 0.063 (0.038~0.290) | 0.049 | 0.033 ± 0.036 | 0.265 |
| High | 72 | 0.163 (0.093~0.356) | 0.049 ± 0.045 | |||
$Wilcoxon signed-rank test *Paired-t test
Figure 1(A) Comparison of miR-210 levels in 50 pairs of UTUC and the corresponding non-cancerous urothelium. The expression level of miR-210 is significantly higher in UTUC than in non-cancerous urothelium (B) Comparison of HIF-1α levels in 50 pairs of UTUC and the corresponding non-cancerous urothelium. The expression level of HIF-1α is significantly higher in UTUC than in non-cancerous urothelium.
Figure 2(A) MiR-210 expression level is higher in locally advanced UTUC than in organ confined UTUC. (B) MiR-210 expression level is higher in high-grade UTUC than in low-grade UTUC.
Figure 3(A) The ROC curve analysis for miR-210 expression to calculate the best cut-off point that discriminates between UTUC and non-cancerous urothelium. The area under curve (AUC) is 0.904 (95% CI = 0.843-0.865, p < 0.001). (B) The ROC curve analysis for HIF-1α expression. The AUC is 0.701 (95% CI = 0.597-0.805, p = 0.001).