| Literature DB >> 28637704 |
Haotian Wu1,2, Li Li3, Pei Niu3,4, Xu Huang3, Jinyi Liu4, Fengshun Zhang4, Wenzeng Shen4, Wenchang Tan3,5,6, Yiling Wu7,2,8,9, Yunlong Huo10,6.
Abstract
Animal models are of importance to investigate basic mechanisms for ischemic heart failure (HF). The objective of the study was to create a rabbit model through multiple coronary artery ligations to investigate the postoperative structure-function remodeling of the left ventricle (LV) and coronary arterial trees. Here, we hypothesize that the interplay of the degenerated coronary vasculature and increased ventricle wall stress relevant to cardiac fibrosis in vicinity of myocardial infarction (MI) precipitates the incidence and progression of ischemic HF Echocardiographic measurements showed an approximately monotonic drop of fractional shortening and ejection fraction from 40% and 73% down to 28% and 58% as well as persistent enlargement of LV cavity and slight mitral regurgitation at postoperative 12 weeks. Micro-CT and histological measurements showed that coronary vascular rarefaction and cardiac fibrosis relevant to inflammation occurred concurrently in vicinity of MI at postoperative 12 weeks albeit there was compensatory vascular growth at postoperative 6 weeks. These findings validate the proposed rabbit model and prove the hypothesis. The post-MI rabbit model can serve as a reference to test various drugs for treatment of ischemic HF.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary arterial trees; ischemic heart failure; myocardial infarction; rabbit model; structure‐function remodeling
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28637704 PMCID: PMC5492201 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1(A–B) A sham rabbit heart perfused with the casting solution (A: anterior view; B: posterior view); (C–D) A rabbit heart with four patchy areas of myocardial infarction perfused with the casting solution (C: anterior view; D: posterior view), where blue and black square regions refer to the locations of plugs (~4 × 4 mm) of myocardial tissues removed from border and normal zones, respectively; and (E–F) The LV cavity and coronary arterial trees reconstructed from μ CT images of (E) a sham rabbit and (F) a rabbit of myocardial infarction.
Figure 2(A–B) Right parasternal short‐axis echocardiographic view with the two‐dimensional guided M‐mode tracing in (A) a sham rabbit and (B) a rabbit of myocardial infarction; (C–D) Subcostal apical five‐chamber echocardiographic view of aortic outflow velocity with the pulsed Doppler tracing in (C) a sham rabbit and (D) a rabbit of myocardial infarction; and (E–F) Subcostal apical four‐chamber echocardiographic view of mitral inflow velocity with the pulsed Doppler tracing in (E) a sham rabbit and (F) a rabbit of myocardial infarction at postoperative 6 weeks.
Figure 3(A–B) Right parasternal short‐axis echocardiographic view with the two‐dimensional guided M‐mode tracing in (A) a sham rabbit and (B) a rabbit of myocardial infarction; (C–D) Subcostal apical five‐chamber echocardiographic view of aortic outflow velocity with the pulsed Doppler tracing in (C) a sham rabbit and (D) a rabbit of myocardial infarction; and (E–F) Subcostal apical four‐chamber echocardiographic view of mitral inflow velocity with the pulsed Doppler tracing in (E) a sham rabbit and (F) a rabbit of myocardial infarction at postoperative 12 weeks.
Echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in sham and ligation groups for 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively
| Variable | Sham | Ligation (6 weeks) | Ligation (12 weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IVSs (cm) | 0.39 ± 0.12 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.05 |
| IVSd(cm) | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.05 |
| LVPWs (cm) | 0.39 ± 0.11 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
| LVPWd (cm) | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 0.24 ± 0.05 | 0.22 ± 0.04 |
| ASD (cm) | 0.87 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.87 ± 0.07 |
| APV (m/s) | 0.85 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.12 | 0.60 ± 0.14 |
| MPV (m/s) | 0.75 ± 0.16 | 0.66 ± 0.11 | 0.51 ± 0.18 |
| LVSP | 99 ± 20 | 93 ± 15 | 90 ± 16 |
| LVEDP | 6 ± 3 | 16 ± 10 | 18 ± 11 |
|
| 5421 ± 578 | 3894 ± 719 | 3326 ± 612 |
|
| −4091 ± 772 | −2945 ± 553 | −2399 ± 478 |
| HR (bpm) | 207 ± 28 | 215 ± 29 | 219 ± 38 |
| BW (Kg) | 3.19 ± 0.03 | 3.02 ± 0.13 | 2.99 ± 0.16 |
Superscript * refers to the statistical difference (P < 0.05) between sham and ligation groups.
Figure 4Postoperative changes of (A) LVD s, (B) LVD d, (C) FS (%), and (D) EF (%) with time. There is statistical difference of the four parameters (P < 0.05) between sham and ligation groups.
Figure 5P–V loops in the LV of sham‐operated or post‐MI rabbits with or without dopamine at postoperative 6 weeks.
Hematological parameters in sham and ligation groups at postoperative 11 weeks
| Variable | Sham | Ligation |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (109
| 7.84 ± 2.60 | 15.67 ± 5.55 | <0.05 |
| RBC (1012/ | 5.64 ± 0.43 | 5.52 ± 0.68 | 0.72 |
| MO (%) | 10.52 ± 7.54 | 16.17 ± 6.50 | 0.19 |
| E (%) | 0.68 ± 0.42 | 0.35 ± 0.22 | 0.12 |
| B (%) | 0.55 ± 0.26 | 0.73 ± 0.76 | 0.58 |
| PDW (%) | 15.35 ± 0.62 | 16.05 ± 1.09 | 0.20 |
| MPV (fl) | 4.87 ± 0.59 | 5.03 ± 0.25 | 0.54 |
| PCT (%) | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 0.33 ± 0.11 | <0.05 |
| NRBC (%) | 0 | 1.75 ± 2.36 | <0.05 |
| HGB (g/ | 118.02 ± 7.55 | 99.83 ± 15.12 | <0.05 |
| MCV (fl) | 64.38 ± 3.51 | 54.12 ± 6.25 | <0.05 |
| NE (%) | 39.18 ± 4.93 | 56.27 ± 10.27 | <0.05 |
| LY (%) | 49.08 ± 8.32 | 26.48 ± 16.32 | <0.05 |
| HCT (%) | 34.01 ± 6.96 | 29.82 ± 4.4 | 0.24 |
| RDW (%) | 14.93 ± 1.40 | 20.0 ± 6.0 | 0.07 |
Figure 6Relative vessel densities (i.e., and a unit value in the sham group) at normal and border zones of rabbit LV of myocardial infarction at postoperative 6 and 12 weeks, where column and error bars refer to the mean and SD values (averaged over all sectioned plugs, n = 5 for each group). This study only computed the density of arterioles with diameter ≥36 μm.
Figure 7(A) 2,3,5‐Triphenyl‐2H‐tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining of a rabbit of myocardial infarction at postoperative 6 weeks, where S1‐S7 represent the basal to apical segments of the LV; and (B‐E) Masson trichrome staining of myocardial tissues near the LV apex (i.e., S7 segment) of (B–C) a rabbit of MI at postoperative 6 weeks and (D‐E) a rabbit of MI at postoperative 12 weeks, where Figs. B and D show the infarct zone and Figs. C and E show the border zone. Mahogany and turquoise colors in Figs. B–E refer to myocytes and fibrosis, respectively.
Figure 8(A) Fibrotic and (B) infarct area ratios (%) of the sham group as well as the ligation group at postoperative 6 and 12 weeks, where column and error bars refer to the mean and SD values (averaged over the corresponding animals, n = 5 for each group).