Literature DB >> 28634762

Rapid preconcentration of viable bacteria using magnetic ionic liquids for PCR amplification and culture-based diagnostics.

Kevin D Clark1, Jeffrey A Purslow1, Stephen A Pierson1, Omprakash Nacham1, Jared L Anderson2.   

Abstract

In this study, a series of magnetic ionic liquids (MILs) were investigated for the extraction and preconcentration of bacteria from aqueous samples. By dispersing small volumes (e.g., 15 μL) of MIL within an aqueous cell suspension, bacteria were rapidly extracted and isolated using a magnetic field. Of the seven hydrophobic MILs examined, the trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium Ni(II) hexafluoroacetylacetonate ([P66614+][Ni(hfacac)3-]) MIL exhibited the greatest enrichment of viable Escherichia coli K12 when coupled with microbiological culture as the detection method. The MIL-based strategy was applied for the preconcentration of E. coli from aqueous samples to obtain enrichment factors (E F) as high as 44.6 in less than 10 min. The MIL extraction approach was also interfaced with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification where the positive detection of E. coli was achieved with the [P66614+][Co(hfacac)3-], [P66614+][Ni(hfacac)3-], [P66614+][Dy(hfacac)4-], and [P66614+][Nd(hfacac)4-] MILs. While direct sampling of an aqueous cell suspension at a concentration of 1.68 × 104 colony-forming units (CFUs) mL-1 yielded no amplicon when subjected to PCR, extraction of the sample with the [P66614+][Ni(hfacac)3-] MIL under optimized conditions provided sufficient enrichment of E. coli for amplicon detection. Importantly, the enrichment of bacteria using the Ni(II)-, Co(II)-, and Dy(III)-based MILs was compatible with real-time quantitative PCR amplification to dramatically improve sample throughput and lower detection limits to 1.0 × 102 CFUs mL-1. The MIL-based method is much faster than existing enrichment approaches that typically require 24-h cultivation times prior to detection and could potentially be applied for the preconcentration of a variety of Gram-negative bacteria from aqueous samples. Graphical abstract Magnetic ionic liquid solvents rapidly preconcentrate viable E. coli cells for unambiguous pathogen detection using microbiological culture and qPCR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture diagnostics; Ionic liquids; Preconcentration; Sample preparation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28634762     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0439-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biological and nanotechnological applications using interactions between ionic liquids and nucleic acids.

Authors:  Hisae Tateishi-Karimata; Naoki Sugimoto
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2018-04-23

2.  Development of an innovative and sustainable one-step method for rapid plant DNA isolation for targeted PCR using magnetic ionic liquids.

Authors:  Arianna Marengo; Cecilia Cagliero; Barbara Sgorbini; Jared L Anderson; Miranda N Emaus; Carlo Bicchi; Cinzia M Bertea; Patrizia Rubiolo
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 4.993

3.  Rapid Detection of Legionella pneumophila in Drinking Water, Based on Filter Immunoassay and Chronoamperometric Measurement.

Authors:  Josune J Ezenarro; Noemí Párraga-Niño; Miquel Sabrià; Fancisco Javier Del Campo; Francesc-Xavier Muñoz-Pascual; Jordi Mas; Naroa Uria
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-20

Review 4.  Emerging Bioanalytical Devices and Platforms for Rapid Detection of Pathogens in Environmental Samples.

Authors:  Lightson Ngashangva; Bahaa A Hemdan; Mohamed Azab El-Liethy; Vinay Bachu; Shelley D Minteer; Pranab Goswami
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 5.  Point-of-Care Strategies for Detection of Waterborne Pathogens.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Monika Nehra; Jyotsana Mehta; Neeraj Dilbaghi; Giovanna Marrazza; Ajeet Kaushik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  A gadolinium-based magnetic ionic liquid for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction.

Authors:  Mohamed A Abdelaziz; Fotouh R Mansour; Neil D Danielson
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.142

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.