| Literature DB >> 28634587 |
Christopher J Gaffney1,2, Peter Mansell1, Francis B Stephens2, Ian A Macdonald1, Kostas Tsintzas1.
Abstract
This study investigated how acute restoration of normoglycaemia affected energy metabolism during exercise in nonobese patients with type 2 diabetes. Six subjects (mean ± SEM) aged 56.2 ± 2.7 years, with a BMI of 24.5 ± 1.5 kg/m2 and a VO2 peak of 28.7 ml/kg/min, attended the lab on two randomised occasions for a four-hour resting infusion of insulin or saline, followed by 30 minutes cycling at 50% VO2 peak. During the 4 h resting infusion, there was a greater (P < 0.0001) reduction in blood glucose in insulin treatment (INS) (from 11.2 ± 0.6 to 5.6 ± 0.1 mmol/l) than in saline treatment/control (CON) (from 11.5 ± 0.7 to 8.5 ± 0.6 mmol/l). This was associated with a lower (P < 0.05) resting metabolic rate in INS (3.87 ± 0.17) than in CON (4.39 ± 0.30 kJ/min). During subsequent exercise, blood glucose increased significantly in INS from 5.6 ± 0.1 at 0 min to 6.3 ± 0.3 mmol/l at 30 min (P < 0.01), which was accompanied by a lower blood lactate response (P < 0.05). Oxygen uptake, rates of substrate utilization, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion were not different between trials. Insulin-induced normoglycaemia increased blood glucose during subsequent exercise without altering overall substrate utilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28634587 PMCID: PMC5467393 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8248725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Res Impact factor: 4.011
Subject demographics and inclusion and exclusion criteria for subjects.
| Subject demographics | |
|---|---|
| Age | 56.2 ± 2.7 years |
| Gender distribution | 5 male and 1 female participants |
| Height (m) | 1.64 ± 0.04 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.7 ± 6.0 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.5 ± 1.5 |
| Time since diagnosis (years) | 7.8 ± 1.4 |
| Diabetes treatment | Metformin ( |
| HbA1c (%)/mmol/mol | 9.4 ± 0.3/78.9 ± 3.8 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) | 11.3 ± 0.6 |
| Predicted RMR (Schofield equations) [ | 6.36 ± 0.31 |
| Calculated RMR (MJ/d) | 5.31 ± 1.15 |
| VO2 peak (ml/kg/min) | 28.7 (82 ± 4% of the predicted values for healthy
|
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
| Type 2 diabetes diagnosed >2 yrs before consent | History of cardiac disease |
| Age 40–69 years inclusive | History of cerebrovascular events or transient ischemic episodes |
| BMI: <30 kg/m2 | History of intermittent claudication |
| Suboptimal glycaemic control: HbA1c > 8% (64 mmol/mol) | Significant hypertension defined as a systolic BP > 170 mmHg
|
| Evidence of recent, regular moderate physical activity
| Any other disease likely to affect the ability to exercise including
|
| Normal resting 12-lead ECG | Any cardiorespiratory drugs other than thiazide diuretics, aspirin,
|
| No significant ECG changes or chest pain during a Bruce
| Secondary complications: any diabetic retinopathy other
|
Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 1Serum insulin (a) and blood glucose (b) concentrations during the INS and CON trials. Data represent n = 6, mean ± SEM. (a) During the resting phase, the infusion significantly increased serum insulin in INS compared to CON (main effect of infusion, P < 0.01); there were also significant interaction (P < 0.0001) and time (P < 0.0001) effects. During exercise, there was no effect of infusion, time, or an interaction. (b) At rest, the infusion significantly lowered blood glucose in INS compared to CON (main effect of infusion, P < 0.01); there were also significant interaction (P < 0.0001) and time (P < 0.0001) effects. During exercise, blood glucose increased significantly in INS (P < 0.01) but not in CON. #P < 0.0001 from CON; aP < 0.01 from immediately before exercise (0 min).
Figure 2Plasma FFA (a) and blood lactate (b) concentrations during the INS and CON trials. Data represent n = 6, mean ± SEM. (a) At rest, there were significant time (P < 0.001) and interaction (P < 0.05) effects, where plasma FFA were suppressed in INS. During exercise, there was a significant time effect (P < 0.001) and a trend (P = 0.085) for an interaction effect, where plasma FFA in INS increased to greater extent than that in CON. (b) At rest, there was no significant effect of the insulin infusion or time on blood lactate, although there was a significant interaction effect (P < 0.01). During exercise, there were significant time (P < 0.001) and interaction (P < 0.05) effects, where the blood lactate response was lower in INS than that in CON. ∗P < 0.05 from CON; ∗∗P < 0.01 from CON.
Physiological and metabolic responses to the infusion of insulin (INS) and saline (CON) in patients with T2D whilst resting for four hours.
| Baseline | 60 mins | 120 mins | 180 mins | 240 mins | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EE | CON | 4.29 ± 0.28 | 4.57 ± 0.41 | 4.28 ± 0.26 | 4.29 ± 0.35 | 4.42 ± 0.33 |
| INS | 4.01 ± 0.24 | 3.88 ± 0.14 | 3.91 ± 0.21∗ | 3.78 ± 0.24 | 3.90 ± 0.16 | |
| RER | CON | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.02 |
| INS | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.02∗ | 0.94 ± 0.02∗∗ | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.91 ± 0.02 | |
| CHO ox | CON | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.02 |
| INS | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.02∗ | 0.19 ± 0.02∗∗ | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | |
| FAT ox | CON | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
| INS | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01∗ | 0.02 ± 0.01∗∗ | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
Data represent n = 6, and values are means ± SEM for energy expenditure (EE) in kJ/min, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), carbohydrate oxidation (CHO ox), and fat oxidation (FAT ox) in g/min. Star symbols denote a significant difference between CON and INS (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01).
Figure 3Serum sodium (a) and potassium (b) concentrations during the INS and CON trials. Data represent n = 6, mean ± SEM. (a) At rest, the infusion significantly increased serum sodium in INS compared to that in CON (P < 0.05) but there were no significant interaction or time effects. During exercise, there were no significant main effects for infusion, time, or interaction. (b) At rest, there was a trend (P = 0.060) for lower potassium in INS than in CON and a trend (P = 0.063) for time effect. During exercise, there was a significant increase in serum potassium (time effect P < 0.05) but there were no significant differences between INS and CON. ∗P < 0.05 from CON.
Physiological and metabolic responses to submaximal cycling following infusion with insulin (INS) or saline (CON) in patients with T2D.
| O2 uptake (ml/kg/min) | RER | CHO ox (g/min) | Fat ox (g/min) | Heart rate (beats/min) | RPE (6–20) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 14.1 ± 1.1 | 0.86 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.11 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 124 ± 6 | 11.6 ± 0.6 |
| INS | 14.1 ± 1.5 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 118 ± 7 | 11.2 ± 0.9 |
Values represent n = 6 and are displayed as mean ± SEM for 30 min of exercise. RER denotes respiratory exchange ratio; CHO ox denotes carbohydrate oxidation rate; fat ox denotes fat oxidation.