Literature DB >> 28634162

Linking the content to demographic reach of online advertising of electronic nicotine delivery systems.

David S Timberlake1, Dmitriy Nikitin2, Jennifer Garcia-Cano1, Samantha Cino1, Margarita Savkina1, Cornelia Pechmann3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have separately examined the content and demographic reach of the advertising of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). No study to our knowledge has linked the two in investigating whether racial/ethnic groups are differentially exposed to the comparative messages conveyed in online ENDS advertisements.
METHODS: 932 unique ENDS advertisements (6311 total), which were posted on 3435 websites between December, 2009 and October, 2015, were categorized as either comparative or non-comparative with respect to the traditional cigarette. The race/ethnicity of website visitors was obtained from a proprietary source and used in constructing variables for racial/ethnic viewership. The variables for advertising content and website racial/ethnic viewership were then linked yielding a final sample of 551 unique ENDS advertisements (2498 total) on 1206 websites. A two-level hierarchical generalized linear model, used in estimating website racial/ethnic viewership as a predictor of comparative advertising, accounted for the nesting of advertisements (level 1) within 152 ENDS brands (level 2).
RESULTS: In contrast to racial/ethnic minorities, a greater proportion of non-Hispanic whites visited websites with ENDS advertisements than the overall proportion of nonHispanic white U.S. Internet users. Yet, it was the advertisements on websites that appealed to Hispanics that had greater odds of comparing ENDS to traditional cigarettes.
CONCLUSIONS: The lower exposure to ENDS advertising among racial/ethnic minorities versus non-Hispanic whites is consistent with survey data. Yet, the greater odds of comparative advertising of ENDS on websites that appeal to racial/ethnic minorities (ie, Hispanics) could impact the longterm health of minority smokers. IMPLICATIONS: This study's findings have important implications for the uptake of ENDS among minority smokers. If the comparative advertising yields greater interest and eventual use of ENDS, then minority smokers could either benefit from smoking cessation because they switch to ENDS, or adopt dual tobacco use. The fate of comparative advertising of ENDS versus the traditional cigarette will depend on the Food and Drug Administration enforcement of its deeming rules and the ensuing changes in the ENDS marketplace. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advertising and Promotion; Electronic nicotine delivery devices; Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28634162      PMCID: PMC5764813          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  19 in total

1.  Reduced harm or another gateway to smoking? source, message, and information characteristics of E-cigarette videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Hye-Jin Paek; Sookyong Kim; Thomas Hove; Jung Yoon Huh
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-10-11

2.  Misperceptions of nicotine replacement therapy within racially and ethnically diverse smokers.

Authors:  Matthew J Carpenter; Marvella E Ford; Kathleen Cartmell; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Muhannad Malas; Jan van der Tempel; Robert Schwartz; Alexa Minichiello; Clayton Lightfoot; Aliya Noormohamed; Jaklyn Andrews; Laurie Zawertailo; Roberta Ferrence
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Rapidly increasing promotional expenditures for e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Rachel Kornfield; Jidong Huang; Lisa Vera; Sherry L Emery
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Differences in Electronic Cigarette Awareness, Use History, and Advertisement Exposure Between Black and White Hospitalized Cigarette Smokers.

Authors:  Angela Warren Baumann; Connie Kohler; Young-il Kim; JeeWon Cheong; Peter Hendricks; William C Bailey; Kathleen F Harrington
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  "Smoking revolution": a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites.

Authors:  Rachel A Grana; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Tobacco on the web: surveillance and characterisation of online tobacco and e-cigarette advertising.

Authors:  Amanda Richardson; Ollie Ganz; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Wanna know about vaping? Patterns of message exposure, seeking and sharing information about e-cigarettes across media platforms.

Authors:  Sherry L Emery; Lisa Vera; Jidong Huang; Glen Szczypka
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison.

Authors:  Kar-Hai Chu; Anupreet K Sidhu; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2015-09-11
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pro-tobacco marketing and anti-tobacco campaigns aimed at vulnerable populations: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Tess Boley Cruz; Shyanika W Rose; Brianna A Lienemann; M Justin Byron; Helen I Meissner; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Li-Ling Huang; Dana M Carroll; Claradina Soto; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.600

2.  Relationship between population characteristics, e-cigarette and tobacco-related perceptions, and likelihood of ever using e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Jack A Pfeiffer; Lindsay K Tompkins; Joy L Hart; Anshula Kesh; Allison Groom; Thanh-Huyen T Vu; Jennie Z Ma; Robyn Landry; Thomas J Payne; Aida L Giachello; Rose Marie Robertson; Kandi L Walker
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2020-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.