Jianqiang Qian1,2, Zhengwen Wang1, Jitka Klimešová3, Xiaotao Lü1, Wennong Kuang1, Zhimin Liu1, Xingguo Han1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110164, P. R. China. 2. Department of Functional Ecology, Institute of Botany ASCR, CZ-379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Functional Ecology, Institute of Botany ASCR, CZ-379 82 Trebon, Czech Republic.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Understanding the changes in below-ground bud bank density and composition along a climatic gradient is essential for the exploration of species distribution pattern and vegetation composition in response to climatic changes. Nevertheless, investigations on bud banks along climatic gradients are still scarce. The below-ground bud bank is expected to be reduced in size in arid conditions, and costly, bud-bearing organs with long spacers would be replaced by more compact forms with buds that are better protected than those found in moist conditions. Methods: How total bud density and composition (different bud bank types) change with aridity (calculated value 0·43-0·91), mean annual precipitation (MAP; 93-420 mm) and mean annual temperature (MAT; -1·51 to 6·93 °C) was tested at 21 sites along a 2500-km climatic gradient in the temperate steppe of northern China. Conclusions: Belowground bud bank density decreases towards the dry, hot end of the climatic gradient. Based on the distribution of bud types along the climatic gradient, bulb buds and tiller buds of tussock grasses seem to be more resistant to environmental stress than rhizome buds. The dominance of annual species and smaller bud banks in arid region implies that plant reproductive strategies and vegetation composition will be shifted in scenarios of increased drought under future climate change.
Background and Aims: Understanding the changes in below-ground bud bank density and composition along a climatic gradient is essential for the exploration of species distribution pattern and vegetation composition in response to climatic changes. Nevertheless, investigations on bud banks along climatic gradients are still scarce. The below-ground bud bank is expected to be reduced in size in arid conditions, and costly, bud-bearing organs with long spacers would be replaced by more compact forms with buds that are better protected than those found in moist conditions. Methods: How total bud density and composition (different bud bank types) change with aridity (calculated value 0·43-0·91), mean annual precipitation (MAP; 93-420 mm) and mean annual temperature (MAT; -1·51 to 6·93 °C) was tested at 21 sites along a 2500-km climatic gradient in the temperate steppe of northern China. Conclusions: Belowground bud bank density decreases towards the dry, hot end of the climatic gradient. Based on the distribution of bud types along the climatic gradient, bulb buds and tiller buds of tussock grasses seem to be more resistant to environmental stress than rhizome buds. The dominance of annual species and smaller bud banks in arid region implies that plant reproductive strategies and vegetation composition will be shifted in scenarios of increased drought under future climate change.
Authors: Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Fernando T Maestre; Antonio Gallardo; Matthew A Bowker; Matthew D Wallenstein; Jose Luis Quero; Victoria Ochoa; Beatriz Gozalo; Miguel García-Gómez; Santiago Soliveres; Pablo García-Palacios; Miguel Berdugo; Enrique Valencia; Cristina Escolar; Tulio Arredondo; Claudia Barraza-Zepeda; Donaldo Bran; José Antonio Carreira; Mohamed Chaieb; Abel A Conceição; Mchich Derak; David J Eldridge; Adrián Escudero; Carlos I Espinosa; Juan Gaitán; M Gabriel Gatica; Susana Gómez-González; Elizabeth Guzman; Julio R Gutiérrez; Adriana Florentino; Estela Hepper; Rosa M Hernández; Elisabeth Huber-Sannwald; Mohammad Jankju; Jushan Liu; Rebecca L Mau; Maria Miriti; Jorge Monerris; Kamal Naseri; Zouhaier Noumi; Vicente Polo; Aníbal Prina; Eduardo Pucheta; Elizabeth Ramírez; David A Ramírez-Collantes; Roberto Romão; Matthew Tighe; Duilio Torres; Cristian Torres-Díaz; Eugene D Ungar; James Val; Wanyoike Wamiti; Deli Wang; Eli Zaady Journal: Nature Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Xuehua Ye; Shuangli Tang; William K Cornwell; Shuqin Gao; Zhenying Huang; Ming Dong; Johannes H C Cornelissen Journal: J Environ Manage Date: 2015-01-02 Impact factor: 6.789
Authors: David D Briske; Mengli Zhao; Guodong Han; Changbai Xiu; David R Kemp; Walter Willms; Kris Havstad; Le Kang; Zhongwu Wang; Jianguo Wu; Xingguo Han; Yongfei Bai Journal: J Environ Manage Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 6.789
Authors: Amy E Zanne; David C Tank; William K Cornwell; Jonathan M Eastman; Stephen A Smith; Richard G FitzJohn; Daniel J McGlinn; Brian C O'Meara; Angela T Moles; Peter B Reich; Dana L Royer; Douglas E Soltis; Peter F Stevens; Mark Westoby; Ian J Wright; Lonnie Aarssen; Robert I Bertin; Andre Calaminus; Rafaël Govaerts; Frank Hemmings; Michelle R Leishman; Jacek Oleksyn; Pamela S Soltis; Nathan G Swenson; Laura Warman; Jeremy M Beaulieu Journal: Nature Date: 2013-12-22 Impact factor: 49.962