Literature DB >> 25687702

Strategies to alleviate poverty and grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia: intensification vs production efficiency of livestock systems.

David D Briske1, Mengli Zhao2, Guodong Han3, Changbai Xiu3, David R Kemp4, Walter Willms5, Kris Havstad6, Le Kang7, Zhongwu Wang1, Jianguo Wu8, Xingguo Han9, Yongfei Bai9.   

Abstract

Semi-nomadic pastoralism was replaced by sedentary pastoralism in Inner Mongolia during the 1960's in response to changes in land use policy and increasing human population. Large increases in numbers of livestock and pastoralist households (11- and 9-fold, respectively) during the past 60 yrs have variously degraded the majority of grasslands in Inner Mongolia (78 M ha) and jeopardize the livelihoods of 24 M human inhabitants. A prevailing strategy for alleviating poverty and grassland degradation emphasizes intensification of livestock production systems to maintain both pastoral livelihoods and large livestock numbers. We consider this strategy unsustainable because maximization of livestock revenue incurs high supplemental feed costs, marginalizes net household income, and promotes larger flock sizes to create a positive feedback loop driving grassland degradation. We offer an alternative strategy that increases both livestock production efficiency and net pastoral income by marketing high quality animal products to an increasing affluent Chinese economy while simultaneously reducing livestock impacts on grasslands. We further caution that this strategy be designed and assessed within a social-ecological framework capable of coordinating market expansion for livestock products, sustainable livestock carrying capacities, modified pastoral perceptions of success, and incentives for ecosystem services to interrupt the positive feedback loop that exists between subsistence pastoralism and grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pastoral livelihoods; Pastoralism; Poverty trap; Social-ecological systems; Sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25687702     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  Differences in below-ground bud bank density and composition along a climatic gradient in the temperate steppe of northern China.

Authors:  Jianqiang Qian; Zhengwen Wang; Jitka Klimešová; Xiaotao Lü; Wennong Kuang; Zhimin Liu; Xingguo Han
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Microcredit programs may increase risk to pastoralist livelihoods in Inner Mongolia.

Authors:  Yu Lu; Lynn Huntsinger; WenJun Li
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Exploring the frontiers of sustainable livelihoods research within grassland ecosystem: A scientometric analysis.

Authors:  Tong Li; Lizhen Cui; Wencong Lv; Xiufang Song; Xiaoyong Cui; Li Tang
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-22

4.  Reduced grazing pressure delivers production and environmental benefits for the typical steppe of north China.

Authors:  Yingjun Zhang; Ding Huang; Warwick B Badgery; David R Kemp; Wenqing Chen; Xiaoya Wang; Nan Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.