| Literature DB >> 28630662 |
Charalambos Sigalas1, Eleni Konsolaki2, Irini Skaliora1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several molecular and cellular processes in the vertebrate brain exhibit differences between males and females, leading to sexual dimorphism in the formation of neural circuits and brain organization. While studies on large-scale brain networks provide ample evidence for both structural and functional sex differences, smaller-scale local networks have remained largely unexplored. In the current study, we investigate sexual dimorphism in cortical dynamics by means of spontaneous Up/Down states, a type of network activity that is exhibited during slow-wave sleep, quiet wakefulness, and anesthesia and is thought to represent the default activity of the cortex.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Brain slices; Development; Neuronal network activity; Sex dimorphism
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28630662 PMCID: PMC5471918 DOI: 10.1186/s13293-017-0143-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sex Differ ISSN: 2042-6410 Impact factor: 5.027
Fig. 1Up state activity is enhanced in female mice. LFP traces at a higher and c lower temporal resolution obtained from male (top) and female (bottom) mice. b Bar graphs for Up state duration and d occurrence (Box–Cox transformed for normality) of male (black shade) and female (gray shade) mice. Data in bars are pooled from all ages tested. Insets show line graphs of Up state duration and occurrence in pre-puberty, adult, and old ages. Graphs show mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate significant sex differences (two-way ANOVA, ***p < 0.001 and **p < 0.01)
Age-dependent changes in all Up state parameters measured
| Age | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Up state parameter | Pre-puberty | Adult | Old |
| Duration (sec) | 1.94 ± 0.11***### | 1.35 ± 0.06§ | 1.09 ± 0.04 |
| Occurrence (Box-Cox transformed) | 0.49 ± 0.11***## | −0.39 ± 0.08 | −0.05 ± 0.14 |
| Delta (% relative power) | 42.27 ± 1.82*## | 49.53 ± 1.96 | 52.39 ± 1.96 |
| Theta (% relative power) | 18.57 ± 0.73 | 18.55 ± 0.93 | 17.31 ± 0.90 |
| Alpha (% relative power) | 8.92 ± 0.45**### | 6.69 ± 0.37 | 6.22 ± 0.35 |
| Beta (% relative power) | 15.09 ± 1.05**## | 10.83 ± 0.75 | 10.35 ± 0.78 |
| Gamma (% relative power) | 9.94 ± 0.85 | 8.63 ± 0.77 | 9.11 ± 1.05 |
| Positive peak amplitude (μV) | 38.7 ± 2.16 | 32.6 ± 2.72 | 36 ± 4.37 |
| Negative peak amplitude (μV) | −64.7 ± 3.57* | −46.9 ± 4.39 | −57.9 ± 6.56 |
| Positive peak latency (sec) | 0.64 ± 0.03***### | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.02 |
| Negative peak latency (sec) | 0.62 ± 0.04***### | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.02 |
Values shown are means ± SEM. Statistically significant differences between pre-puberty/adult, pre-puberty/old, and adult/old mice are indicated by the symbols *, #, and §, respectively
*, #, and §, p < 0.05; **, ##, and §§, p < 0.01; ***, ###, and §§§, p < 0.001
Fig. 2Sex differences in Up state power spectrum. a Up state LFP traces and corresponding spectrograms for male (top) and female (bottom) mice. b Bar graphs for Up state relative power percentage in the delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz), beta (12–30 Hz), and gamma (30–100 Hz) range for male (black) and female (gray) mice. Inset shows average relative power percentage without partitioning in the aforementioned frequency bands. Up state relative power percentage represents the normalized power for each band relative to the total power within the 1–200 Hz range for each Up state event. Data in bars are pooled from all ages tested. Graphs show mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate significant sex differences (two-way ANOVA, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Characteristics of Up state peak amplitudes are similar in both sex groups. Bar graphs for Up state peak amplitude voltage (left) and latency (right) of male (black) and female (gray) mice. Data in bars are pooled from all ages tested. Insets show line graphs of Up state peak amplitude voltage and latency in pre-puberty, adult, and old ages. Graphs show mean ± SEM (two-way ANOVA)