| Literature DB >> 28629902 |
Emmanuel Alabi1, Natalie Hutchings2, Kostadinka Bizheva3, Trefford Simpson4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To establish a relationship between the diameter and depth position of vessels in the superior and inferior corneo-scleral limbus using ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT).Entities:
Keywords: Corneal imaging; Córnea; Imagen de la córnea; Imagen óptica; Limbal vasculature; Optical coherence tomography; Optical imaging; Repeatability; Repetición; Tomografía de coherencia óptica; Vasculatura del limbo
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28629902 PMCID: PMC5777926 DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.02.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Optom ISSN: 1989-1342
Figure 1OCT image showing the corneo-scleral limbus. The red arrow shows the termination of the epithelium-Bowman's complex. The blue arrow shows the termination of the Descemet's-endothelial complex. The red dashed line 1 shows the sclero-limbal junction and red dash line 2 shows the corneo-limbal junction. The area between the two lines is the limbal region.
Morphometric characteristics for the superior limbal region.
| Subject | Age (years)/sex (male-M)/(female-F) | Ethnicity | Vessel diameter (μm) | Vessel depth (μm) | # of vessels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean value ± SD | Min–Max values | Mean value ± SD | Min–Max values | ||||
| 1 | 28/M | White | 25 ± 17 | 8–52 | 230 ± 145 | 75–519 | 8 |
| 2 | 30/M | Asian | 16 ± 10 | 6–38 | 167 ± 105 | 47–417 | 10 |
| 3 | 42/M | White | 25 ± 19 | 7–70 | 189 ± 156 | 57–550 | 10 |
| 4 | 24/M | White | 19 ± 14 | 5–55 | 200 ± 111 | 92–464 | 13 |
| 5 | 29/F | Black | 22 ± 17 | 5–55 | 199 ± 108 | 117–483 | 13 |
| 6 | 34/M | Black | 35 ± 27 | 9–116 | 269 ± 136 | 50–531 | 15 |
| 7 | 34/M | Asian | 19 ± 15 | 6–63 | 205 ± 166 | 56–527 | 18 |
| 8 | 32/F | White | 20 ± 13 | 7–64 | 215 ± 123 | 57–568 | 17 |
| 9 | 29/F | White | 28 ± 17 | 10–63 | 219 ± 187 | 57–591 | 12 |
| 10 | 28/F | Black | 29 ± 22 | 7–77 | 194 ± 89 | 82–440 | 15 |
| 11 | 35/F | White | 23 ± 21 | 6–73 | 204 ± 126 | 64–505 | 13 |
| 12 | 55/M | Asian | 19 ± 13 | 6–38 | 173 ± 91 | 66–374 | 9 |
| 13 | 42/M | White | 27 ± 17 | 6–55 | 182 ± 129 | 53–400 | 12 |
| 14 | 26/F | White | 25 ± 21 | 9–64 | 211 ± 182 | 49–642 | 8 |
Morphometric characteristics for the inferior limbal region.
| Subject | Age (years)/sex (male-M)/(female-F) | Ethnicity | Subject | Vessel diameter (μm) | Vessel depth (μm) | # of vessels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean value ± SD | Min–Max values | Mean value ± SD | Min–Max values | |||||
| 1 | 28/M | White | 1 | 25 ± 17 | 8–52 | 230 ± 145 | 75–519 | 8 |
| 2 | 30/M | Asian | 2 | 16 ± 10 | 6–38 | 167 ± 105 | 47–417 | 9 |
| 3 | 42/M | White | 3 | 25 ± 19 | 7–70 | 189 ± 156 | 57–550 | 10 |
| 4 | 24/M | White | 4 | 19 ± 14 | 5–55 | 200 ± 111 | 92–464 | 12 |
| 5 | 29/F | Black | 5 | 22 ± 17 | 5–55 | 199 ± 108 | 117–483 | 13 |
| 6 | 34/M | Black | 6 | 35 ± 27 | 9–116 | 269 ± 136 | 50–531 | 15 |
| 7 | 34/M | Asian | 7 | 19 ± 15 | 6–63 | 205 ± 166 | 56–527 | 18 |
| 8 | 32/F | White | 8 | 20 ± 13 | 7–64 | 215 ± 123 | 57–568 | 17 |
| 9 | 29/F | White | 9 | 28 ± 17 | 10–63 | 219 ± 187 | 57–591 | 12 |
| 10 | 28/F | Black | 10 | 29 ± 22 | 7–77 | 194 ± 89 | 82–440 | 15 |
| 11 | 35/F | White | 11 | 23 ± 21 | 6–73 | 204 ± 126 | 64–505 | 13 |
| 12 | 55/M | Asian | 12 | 19 ± 13 | 6–38 | 173 ± 91 | 66–374 | 9 |
| 13 | 42/M | White | 13 | 27 ± 17 | 6–55 | 182 ± 129 | 53–400 | 12 |
| 14 | 26/F | White | 14 | 25 ± 21 | 9–64 | 211 ± 182 | 49–642 | 8 |
Figure 2(Above) Superior and inferior limbal mean vessel diameters. (Below) Superior and inferior limbal mean vessel depths. The error bars show the 95% confidence interval of the mean.
Figure 4(A) Representative OCT B-scan of a healthy human corneo-scleral limbus. Black arrow marks the conjunctiva. Red arrows mark limbal blood vessels. Blue arrows mark individual red blood cells in the major scleral blood vessel. (B) Three dimensional reconstruction of a set of UHR-OCT tomograms. This reconstruction can be sliced at different angles and the vessels assessed and measured with the requisite ellipse or circle tool. Red arrows mark cross-sections of scleral blood vessels. (C) Three dimensional reconstruction of the limbus with the epithelium stripped through an oblique slice to reveal the vessel structure within the limbus. In (B) and (C) the images were black/white inverted so that the limbal voids being mapped appear as white against a dark background to allow enhanced viewing for readers.
Figure 3Subject-wise regressions illustrating the relationships between vessel depth and diameter in the superior limbus (above) and in the inferior limbus (below).
Relationship between replicate measures of vessel diameter and vessel depth of vessels in the image. The table describes the mean difference in repeated measurement, the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference (95% CI Mean), the upper limit of agreement (upper LOA), the lower limit of agreement (lower LOA), and the coefficient of repeatability (CR). Confidence intervals on the LOAs are determined using the method described by Carkeet.
| Measure | Mean diff. | 95% CI mean diff. | Upper LOA | 95% CI upper LOA | Lower LOA | 95% CI lower LOA | CR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferior diameter | +0.17 | −1.81 to +2.1 | +4.22 | +3.85 to +4.72 | −3.89 | −3.51 to −4.38 | 2.07 |
| Superior diameter | +0.05 | −1.92 to +2.03 | +11.10 | +9.97 to +12.63 | −11.00 | −9.87 to −12.53 | 5.62 |
| Inferior depth | −1.28 | −3.25 to +0.70 | +16.50 | +14.85 to +18.66 | −19.05 | −17.39 to −21.21 | 9.13 |
| Superior depth | +0.26 | −1.72 to +2.24 | +13.08 | +11.77 to +14.85 | −12.57 | −11.25 to −14.34 | 6.53 |