Literature DB >> 28628421

High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Associations between BRCA Mutation Status, CT Imaging Phenotypes, and Clinical Outcomes.

Stephanie Nougaret1, Yulia Lakhman1, Mithat Gönen1, Debra A Goldman1, Maura Miccò1, Melvin D'Anastasi1, Sarah A Johnson1, Krishna Juluru1, Angela G Arnold1, Ramon E Sosa1, Robert A Soslow1, Hebert Alberto Vargas1, Hedvig Hricak1, Noah D Kauff1, Evis Sala1.   

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the associations between BRCA mutation status and computed tomography (CT) phenotypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and to evaluate CT indicators of cytoreductive outcome and survival in patients with BRCA-mutant HGSOC and those with BRCA wild-type HGSOC. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 108 patients (33 with BRCA mutant and 75 with BRCA wild-type HGSOC) who underwent CT before primary debulking. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CT findings for various qualitative CT features. Associations between CT features, BRCA mutation status, cytoreductive outcome, and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively. Results Peritoneal disease (PD) pattern, presence of PD in gastrohepatic ligament, mesenteric involvement, and supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy at CT were associated with BRCA mutation status (multiple regression: P < .001 for each CT feature). While clinical and CT features were not associated with cytoreductive outcome for patients with BRCA-mutant HGSOC, presence of PD in lesser sac (odds ratio [OR] = 2.40) and left upper quadrant (OR = 1.19), mesenteric involvement (OR = 7.10), and lymphadenopathy in supradiaphragmatic (OR = 2.83) and suprarenal para-aortic (OR = 4.79) regions were associated with higher odds of incomplete cytoreduction in BRCA wild-type HGSOC (multiple regression: P < .001 each CT feature). Mesenteric involvement at CT was associated with significantly shorter PFS for both patients with BRCA-mutant HGSOC (multiple regression: hazard ratio [HR] = 26.7 P < .001) and those with BRCA wild-type HGSOC (univariate analysis: reader 1, HR = 2.42, P < .001; reader 2, HR = 2.61; P < .001). Conclusion Qualitative CT features differed between patients with BRCA-mutant HGSOC and patients with BRCA wild-type HGSOC. CT indicators of cytoreductive outcome varied according to BRCA mutation status. Mesenteric involvement at CT was an indicator of significantly shorter PFS for both patients with BRCA-mutant HGSOC and those with BRCA wild-type HGSOC. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28628421      PMCID: PMC5673044          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  38 in total

1.  Morphologic patterns associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 genotype in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert A Soslow; Guangming Han; Kay J Park; Karuna Garg; Narciso Olvera; David R Spriggs; Noah D Kauff; Douglas A Levine
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Multi-institutional reciprocal validation study of computed tomography predictors of suboptimal primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Allison E Axtell; Margaret H Lee; Robert E Bristow; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Steven Raman; John P Weaver; Mojan Gabbay; Michael Ngo; Scott Lentz; Ilana Cass; Andrew J Li; Beth Y Karlan; Christine H Holschneider
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  R E Bristow; L R Duska; N C Lambrou; E K Fishman; M J O'Neill; E L Trimble; F J Montz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Use of CA-125 to define progression of ovarian cancer in patients with persistently elevated levels.

Authors:  G J Rustin; M Marples; A E Nelstrop; M Mahmoudi; T Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The significance of circumscribed malignant mammographic masses in the surveillance of BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  R Kaas; R Kroger; J H C L Hendriks; A P E Besnard; W Koops; F A Pameijer; W Prevoo; C E Loo; S H Muller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Prognostically relevant gene signatures of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Roel G W Verhaak; Pablo Tamayo; Ji-Yeon Yang; Diana Hubbard; Hailei Zhang; Chad J Creighton; Sian Fereday; Michael Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Craig H Mermel; Aleksandar D Kostic; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Gordon Saksena; Kristian Cibulskis; Sekhar Duraisamy; Keren Levanon; Carrie Sougnez; Aviad Tsherniak; Sebastian Gomez; Robert Onofrio; Stacey Gabriel; Lynda Chin; Nianxiang Zhang; Paul T Spellman; Yiqun Zhang; Rehan Akbani; Katherine A Hoadley; Ari Kahn; Martin Köbel; David Huntsman; Robert A Soslow; Anna Defazio; Michael J Birrer; Joe W Gray; John N Weinstein; David D Bowtell; Ronny Drapkin; Jill P Mesirov; Gad Getz; Douglas A Levine; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  The utility of computed tomography scans in predicting suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in women with advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy; Sally A Mullany; Kathy R Brandt; Bonnie J Huppert; William A Cliby
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Effect of BRCA1/2 mutations on long-term survival of patients with invasive ovarian cancer: the national Israeli study of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Angela Chetrit; Galit Hirsh-Yechezkel; Yehuda Ben-David; Flora Lubin; Eitan Friedman; Siegal Sadetzki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A multicenter prospective trial evaluating the ability of preoperative computed tomography scan and serum CA-125 to predict suboptimal cytoreduction at primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Pedro T Ramirez; Debra M Sarasohn; Jerrold B Teitcher; Svetlana Mironov; Revathy B Iyer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Harold Paul; Masayoshi Hosaka; Carol A Aghajanian; Mario M Leitao; Ginger J Gardner; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Hedvig Hricak; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomographic prediction of optimal cytoreduction in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  B E Nelson; A T Rosenfield; P E Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  15 in total

1.  Association between CT-texture-derived tumor heterogeneity, outcomes, and BRCA mutation status in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Meier; Harini Veeraraghavan; Stephanie Nougaret; Yulia Lakhman; Ramon Sosa; Robert A Soslow; Elizabeth J Sutton; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala; Hebert A Vargas
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  Current update on the molecular genetics and management of hereditary ovarian cancers: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Malak Itani; Neeraj Lalwani; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Maria Zulfiqar; Cary Siegel
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-13

3.  Development of survival predictors for high-grade serous ovarian cancer based on stable radiomic features from computed tomography images.

Authors:  Jiaqi Hu; Zhiwu Wang; Ruocheng Zuo; Chengcai Zheng; Bingjian Lu; Xiaodong Cheng; Weiguo Lu; Chunhui Zhao; Pengyuan Liu; Yan Lu
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Does the method of primary treatment affect the pattern of first recurrence in high-grade serous ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Yuki Himoto; Paulina Cybulska; Fuki Shitano; Evis Sala; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Stephanie Nougaret; Ines Nikolovski; Hebert A Vargas; Wei Wang; Jennifer J Mueller; Dennis S Chi; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Current update on malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Sherif B Elsherif; Priya R Bhosale; Chandana Lall; Christine O Menias; Malak Itani; Kristina A Butler; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 6.  Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Francesca Moro; Rosanna Esposito; Chiara Landolfo; Wouter Froyman; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin; Antonia Carla Testa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.629

7.  Effect of BRCA mutational status on survival outcome in advanced-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Se Ik Kim; Maria Lee; Hee Seung Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae-Weon Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  A mathematical-descriptor of tumor-mesoscopic-structure from computed-tomography images annotates prognostic- and molecular-phenotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Haonan Lu; Mubarik Arshad; Andrew Thornton; Giacomo Avesani; Paula Cunnea; Ed Curry; Fahdi Kanavati; Jack Liang; Katherine Nixon; Sophie T Williams; Mona Ali Hassan; David D L Bowtell; Hani Gabra; Christina Fotopoulou; Andrea Rockall; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Ovarian cancer staging: What the surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Lucas Roberto Lelis Botelho de Oliveira; Natally Horvat; Pamela Ines Causa Andrieu; Pedro Sergio Brito Panizza; Giovanni Guido Cerri; Publio Cesar Cavalcante Viana
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 10.  Cancer genome landscape: a radiologist's guide to cancer genome medicine with imaging correlates.

Authors:  Francesco Alessandrino; Daniel A Smith; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.