Literature DB >> 28628305

Variation in Methane Emission Rates from Well Pads in Four Oil and Gas Basins with Contrasting Production Volumes and Compositions.

Anna M Robertson1, Rachel Edie1, Dustin Snare2, Jeffrey Soltis1, Robert A Field1, Matthew D Burkhart1, Clay S Bell3, Daniel Zimmerle3, Shane M Murphy1.   

Abstract

Atmospheric methane emissions from active natural gas production sites in normal operation were quantified using an inverse Gaussian method (EPA's OTM 33a) in four major U.S. basins/plays: Upper Green River (UGR, Wyoming), Denver-Julesburg (DJ, Colorado), Uintah (Utah), and Fayetteville (FV, Arkansas). In DJ, Uintah, and FV, 72-83% of total measured emissions were from 20% of the well pads, while in UGR the highest 20% of emitting well pads only contributed 54% of total emissions. The total mass of methane emitted as a percent of gross methane produced, termed throughput-normalized methane average (TNMA) and determined by bootstrapping measurements from each basin, varied widely between basins and was (95% CI): 0.09% (0.05-0.15%) in FV, 0.18% (0.12-0.29%) in UGR, 2.1% (1.1-3.9%) in DJ, and 2.8% (1.0-8.6%) in Uintah. Overall, wet-gas basins (UGR, DJ, Uintah) had higher TNMA emissions than the dry-gas FV at all ranges of production per well pad. Among wet basins, TNMA emissions had a strong negative correlation with average gas production per well pad, suggesting that consolidation of operations onto single pads may reduce normalized emissions (average number of wells per pad is 5.3 in UGR versus 1.3 in Uintah and 2.8 in DJ).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28628305     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Coupled Air Quality and Boundary-Layer Meteorology in Western U.S. Basins during Winter: Design and Rationale for a Comprehensive Study.

Authors:  A Gannet Hallar; Steven S Brown; Erik Crosman; Kelley Barsanti; Christopher D Cappa; Ian Faloona; Jerome Fast; Heather A Holmes; John Horel; John Lin; Ann Middlebrook; Logan Mitchell; Jennifer Murphy; Caroline C Womack; Viney Aneja; Munkhbayar Baasandorj; Roya Bahreini; Robert Banta; Casey Bray; Alan Brewer; Dana Caulton; Joost de Gouw; Stephan F J De Wekker; Delphine K Farmer; Cassandra J Gaston; Sebastian Hoch; Francesca Hopkins; Nakul N Karle; James T Kelly; Kerry Kelly; Neil Lareau; Keding Lu; Roy L Mauldin; Derek V Mallia; Randal Martin; Daniel Mendoza; Holly J Oldroyd; Yelena Pichugina; Kerri A Pratt; Pablo Saide; Phillip J Silva; William Simpson; Britton B Stephens; Jochen Stutz; Amy Sullivan
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 9.116

2.  Multiscale Methane Measurements at Oil and Gas Facilities Reveal Necessary Frameworks for Improved Emissions Accounting.

Authors:  Jiayang Lyra Wang; William S Daniels; Dorit M Hammerling; Matthew Harrison; Kaylyn Burmaster; Fiji C George; Arvind P Ravikumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 11.357

3.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin.

Authors:  John C Lin; Ryan Bares; Benjamin Fasoli; Maria Garcia; Erik Crosman; Seth Lyman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites.

Authors:  Mark Omara; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Katherine A Roberts; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region.

Authors:  Timothy L Vaughn; Clay S Bell; Cody K Pickering; Stefan Schwietzke; Garvin A Heath; Gabrielle Pétron; Daniel J Zimmerle; Russell C Schnell; Dag Nummedal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories.

Authors:  Bruno G Neininger; Bryce F J Kelly; Jorg M Hacker; Xinyi Lu; Stefan Schwietzke
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.