Literature DB >> 28628174

Ranking REACH registered neutral, ionizable and ionic organic chemicals based on their aquatic persistency and mobility.

H P H Arp1, T N Brown, U Berger, S E Hale.   

Abstract

The contaminants that have the greatest chances of appearing in drinking water are those that are mobile enough in the aquatic environment to enter drinking water sources and persistent enough to survive treatment processes. Herein a screening procedure to rank neutral, ionizable and ionic organic compounds for being persistent and mobile organic compounds (PMOCs) is presented and applied to the list of industrial substances registered under the EU REACH legislation as of December 2014. This comprised 5155 identifiable, unique organic structures. The minimum cut-off criteria considered for PMOC classification herein are a freshwater half-life >40 days, which is consistent with the REACH definition of freshwater persistency, and a log Doc < 4.5 between pH 4-10 (where Doc is the organic carbon-water distribution coefficient). Experimental data were given the highest priority, followed by data from an array of available quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), and as a third resort, an original Iterative Fragment Selection (IFS) QSAR. In total, 52% of the unique REACH structures made the minimum criteria to be considered a PMOC, and 21% achieved the highest PMOC ranking (half-life > 40 days, log Doc < 1.0 between pH 4-10). Only 9% of neutral substances received the highest PMOC ranking, compared to 30% of ionizable compounds and 44% of ionic compounds. Predicted hydrolysis products for all REACH parents (contributing 5043 additional structures) were found to have higher PMOC rankings than their parents, due to increased mobility but not persistence. The fewest experimental data available were for ionic compounds; therefore, their ranking is more uncertain than neutral and ionizable compounds. The most sensitive parameter for the PMOC ranking was freshwater persistency, which was also the parameter that QSARs performed the most poorly at predicting. Several prioritized drinking water contaminants in the EU and USA, and other contaminants of concern, were identified as PMOCs. This identification and ranking procedure for PMOCs can be part of a strategy to better identify contaminants that pose a threat to drinking water sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28628174     DOI: 10.1039/c7em00158d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  10 in total

1.  Column bleed in the analysis of highly polar substances: an overlooked aspect in HRMS.

Authors:  Bastian Schulze; Tobias Bader; Wolfram Seitz; Rudi Winzenbacher
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  Analysis of mobile chemicals in the aquatic environment-current capabilities, limitations and future perspectives.

Authors:  Daniel Zahn; Isabelle J Neuwald; Thomas P Knepper
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Surface Water and Wastewater Effluents, Assisted by the Persistency-Mobility-Toxicity Criteria.

Authors:  Rosa Montes; Sandra Méndez; Nieves Carro; Julio Cobas; Nelson Alves; Teresa Neuparth; Miguel Machado Santos; José Benito Quintana; Rosario Rodil
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Sorption and Mobility of Charged Organic Compounds: How to Confront and Overcome Limitations in Their Assessment.

Authors:  Gabriel Sigmund; Hans Peter H Arp; Benedikt M Aumeier; Thomas D Bucheli; Benny Chefetz; Wei Chen; Steven T J Droge; Satoshi Endo; Beate I Escher; Sarah E Hale; Thilo Hofmann; Joseph Pignatello; Thorsten Reemtsma; Torsten C Schmidt; Carina D Schönsee; Martin Scheringer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 5.  Combined effects of heatwaves and micropollutants on freshwater ecosystems: Towards an integrated assessment of extreme events in multiple stressors research.

Authors:  Francesco Polazzo; Sabrina K Roth; Markus Hermann; Annika Mangold-Döring; Andreu Rico; Anna Sobek; Paul J Van den Brink; Michelle C Jackson
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 13.211

6.  Four Chemical Trends Will Shape the Next Decade's Directions in Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Research.

Authors:  Matthias Kotthoff; Mark Bücking
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.221

7.  Emerging pollutants in the EU: 10 years of NORMAN in support of environmental policies and regulations.

Authors:  Valeria Dulio; Bert van Bavel; Eva Brorström-Lundén; Joop Harmsen; Juliane Hollender; Martin Schlabach; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Kevin Thomas; Jan Koschorreck
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.893

8.  Source-related smart suspect screening in the aqueous environment: search for tire-derived persistent and mobile trace organic contaminants in surface waters.

Authors:  Bettina Seiwert; Philipp Klöckner; Stephan Wagner; Thorsten Reemtsma
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Comprehensive micropollutant screening using LC-HRMS/MS at three riverbank filtration sites to assess natural attenuation and potential implications for human health.

Authors:  Juliane Hollender; Judith Rothardt; Dirk Radny; Martin Loos; Jannis Epting; Peter Huggenberger; Paul Borer; Heinz Singer
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2018-11-02

10.  Combining In Silico Tools with Multicriteria Analysis for Alternatives Assessment of Hazardous Chemicals: Accounting for the Transformation Products of decaBDE and Its Alternatives.

Authors:  Ziye Zheng; Hans Peter H Arp; Gregory Peters; Patrik L Andersson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 9.028

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.